1 General Purpose
Double-blind placebo-controlled studies
often include two parallel groups receiving different treatment
modalities. Unlike crossover studies (Chap. 3), they involve independent
treatment effects, i.e., with a zero correlation between the
treatments. The two samples t-test, otherwise called the
independent samples t-test or unpaired samples t-test, is
appropriate for analysis.
2 Schematic Overview of Type of Data File

3 Primary Scientific Question
Is one treatment significantly more
efficaceous than the other.
4 Data Example
In a parallel-group study of 20
patients 10 of them are treated with a sleeping pill, 10 with a
placebo. The first 11 patients of the 20 patient data file is given
underneath.
Outcome
|
group
|
6,00
|
,00
|
7,10
|
,00
|
8,10
|
,00
|
7,50
|
,00
|
6,40
|
,00
|
7,90
|
,00
|
6,80
|
,00
|
6,60
|
,00
|
7,30
|
,00
|
5,60
|
,00
|
5,10
|
1,00
|
We will start with a graph of the data.
The data file is entitled “chapter4unpairedcontinuous”, and is in
extras.springer.com. Start by opening the data file in SPSS.
Command:
-
Graphs....Legacy Dialogs....Error Bar....click Simple....mark Summaries for groups of cases....click Define....Variable: enter "effect treatment"....Category Axis: enter "group"....Bars Represent: choose "Confidence interval for means"....Level: choose 95%....click OK.

The above graph shows that one group
(the placebo group!!) performs much better than the other. The
difference must be statistically significant, because the 95 %
confidence intervals do not overlap. In order to determine the
appropriate level of significance formal statistical testing will
be performed next.
5 Analysis: Unpaired T-Test
For analysis the module Compare Means
is required. It consists of the following statistical models:
-
Means,
-
One-Sample T-Test,
-
Independent-Samples T-Test,
-
Paired-Samples T-Test, and
-
One Way ANOVA.
Command:
-
Analyze....Compare Means....Independent Samples T-test....in dialog box Grouping Variable: Define Groups....Group 1: enter 0,00....Group 2: enter 1,00....click Continue....click OK.
In the output sheet the underneath
table is given.
Independent sample test
Levene’s test for equality of
variances
|
t-test for equality of means
|
|||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
95% confidence interval of the
difference
|
||||||||||
F
|
Sig.
|
t
|
df
|
Sig.(2-tailed)
|
Mean difference
|
Std. Error difference
|
Lower
|
Upper
|
||
Effect treatment
|
Equal variances assumed
|
1,060
|
,317
|
3,558
|
18
|
,002
|
1,72000
|
,48339
|
,70443
|
2,73557
|
Equal variances not assumed
|
3,558
|
15,030
|
,003
|
1,72000
|
,48339
|
,88986
|
2,75014
|
It shows that a significant difference
exists between the sleeping pill and the placebo with a p-value of
0.002 and 0.003. Generally, it is better to use the largest of the
p-values given, because the smallest p-value makes assumptions that
are not always warranted, like, for example in the above table, the
presence of equal variances of the two sets of outcome
values.
6 Alternative Analysis: Mann-Whitney Test
Just like with the Wilcoxon’s test
(Chap. 3) used for paired data, instead of
the paired t-test, the Mann-Whitney test is a nonparametric
alternative for the unpaired t-test. If the data have a Gaussian
distribution, then it is appropriate to use this test even so. More
explanations about Gaussian or parametric distributions are given
in Statistics applied to clinical studies 5th edition, 2009, Chap.
2, Springer Heidelberg Germany, 2012, from the same authors. For
analysis Two-Independent-Samples Tests in the module Nonparametric
Tests is required.
Command:
-
Analyze....Nonparametric....Two-Independent-Samples Tests....Test Variable List: enter ëffect treatment"....Group Variable: enter "group"....click group(??)....click Define Groups....Group 1: enter 0,00....Group 2: enter 1,00....mark Mann-Whitney U....click Continue....click OK.

The nonparametric Mann-Whitney test
produces approximately the same result as the unpaired t-test. The
p-value equals 0,005 corrected for multiple identical values and
even 0,003 uncorrected. The former result is slightly larger,
because it takes into account more, namely, that all tests are
2-tailed (not a single but two sides of the Gaussian distribution
is accounted). Which of the two results is in your final report,
will not make too much of a difference. Ties are rank numbers with
multiple values.
7 Conclusion
Statistical tests for assessing
parallel-groups studies are given, both those that assume
normality, and those that account nonnormality. It may be prudent
to use the latter tests if your data are small, and, if
nonnormality can not be ruled out. Normality of your outcome data
can be statistically tested by goodness of fit tests, and can be
graphically assessed with quantile-quantile plots (see
Sect. 8).
8 Note
More explanations about Gaussian or
parametric distributions are given in Statistics applied to
clinical studies 5th edition, 2012, Chaps. 1 and 2, Springer
Heidelberg Germany, from the same authors.
Normality of your outcome data can be
statistically tested by goodness of fit tests (Statistics applied
to clinical studies 5th edition, 2012, Chap. 42, Springer
Heidelberg Germany, from the same authors), and can be graphically
assessed with quantile-quantile plots (Machine Learning in Medicine
a Complete Overview, 2015, Chap. 42, pp 253–260, Springer
Heidelberg Germany, from the same authors).