Higher Laws.
As I CAME HOME through the woods with my string of
fish, trailing my pole, it being now quite dark, I caught a glimpse
of a woodchuck stealing across my path, and felt a strange thrill
of savage delight, and was strongly tempted to seize and devour him
raw; not that I was hungry then, except for that wildness which he
represented. Once or twice, however, while I lived at the pond, I
found myself ranging the woods, like a half-starved hound, with a
strange abandonment, seeking some kind of venison which I might
devour, and no morsel could have been too savage for me. The
wildest scenes had become unaccountably familiar. I found in
myself, and still find, an instinct toward a higher, or, as it is
named, spiritual life, as do most men, and another toward a
primitive rank and savage one, and I reverence them both. I love
the wild not less than the good. The wildness and adventure that
are in fishing still recommended it to me. I like sometimes to take
rank hold on life and spend my day more as the animals do. Perhaps
I have owed to this employment and to hunting, when quite young, my
closest acquaintance with Nature. They early introduce us to and
detain us in scenery with which otherwise, at that age, we should
have little acquaintance. Fishermen, hunters, woodchoppers, and
others, spending their lives in the fields and woods, in a peculiar
sense a part of Nature themselves, are often in a more favorable
mood for observing her, in the intervals of their pursuits, than
philosophers or poets even, who approach her with expectation. She
is not afraid to exhibit herself to them. The traveller on the
prairie is naturally a hunter, on the head waters of the Missouri
and Columbia a trapper, and at the Falls of St. Mary a fisherman.
He who is only a traveller learns things at second-hand and by the
halves, and is poor authority. We are most interested when science
reports what those men already know practically or instinctively,
for that alone is a true humanity, or account of human
experience.
They mistake who assert that the Yankee has few
amusements, because he has not so many public holidays, and men and
boys do not play so many games as they do in England, for here the
more primitive but solitary amusements of hunting fishing and the
like have not yet given place to the former. Almost every New
England boy among my contemporaries shouldered a fowling piece
between the ages of ten and fourteen; and his hunting and fishing
grounds were not limited like the preserves of an English nobleman,
but were more boundless even than those of a savage. No wonder,
then, that he did not oftener stay to play on the common. But
already a change is taking place, owing, not to an increased
humanity, but to an increased scarcity of game, for perhaps the
hunter is the greatest friend of the animals hunted, not excepting
the Humane Society.
Moreover, when at the pond, I wished sometimes to
add fish to my fare for variety. I have actually fished from the
same kind of necessity that the first fishers did. Whatever
humanity I might conjure up against it was all factitious, and
concerned my philosophy more than my feelings. I speak of fishing
only now, for I had long felt differently about fowling, and sold
my gun before I went to the woods. Not that I am less humane than
others, but I did not perceive that my feelings were much affected.
I did not pity the fishes nor the worms. This was habit. As for
fowling, during the last years that I carried a gun my excuse was
that I was studying ornithology, and sought only new or rare birds.
But I confess that I am now inclined to think that there is a finer
way of studying ornithology than this. It requires so much closer
attention to the habits of the birds, that, if for that reason
only, I have been willing to omit the gun. Yet notwithstanding the
objection on the score of humanity, I am compelled to doubt if
equally valuable sports are ever substituted for these; and when
some of my friends have asked me anxiously about their boys,
whether they should let them hunt, I have answered,
yes,—remembering that it was one of the best parts of my
education,—make them hunters, though sportsmen only at
first, if possible, mighty hunters at last, so that they shall not
find game large enough for them in this or any vegetable
wilderness,—hunters as well as fishers of men.eq
Thus far I am of the opinion of Chaucer’s nun, who
“yave not of the text a pulled hen
That saith that hunters ben not holy men.er
That saith that hunters ben not holy men.er
There is a period in the history of the individual,
as of the race, when the hunters are the “best men,” as the
Algonquins called them. We cannot but pity the boy who has never
fired a gun; he is no more humane, while his education has been
sadly neglected. This was my answer with respect to those youths
who were bent on this pursuit, trusting that they would soon
outgrow it. No humane being, past the thoughtless age of boyhood,
will wantonly murder any creature, which holds its life by the same
tenure that he does. The hare in its extremity cries like a child.
I warn you, mothers, that my sympathies do not always make the
usual philanthropic distinctions.
Such is oftenest the young man’s introduction to
the forest, and the most original part of himself. He goes thither
at first as a hunter and fisher, until at last, if he has the seeds
of a better life in him, he distinguishes his proper objects, as a
poet or naturalist it may be, and leaves the gun and fish-pole
behind. The mass of men are still and always young in this respect.
In some countries a hunting parson is no uncommon sight. Such a one
might make a good shepherd’s dog, but is far from being the Good
Shepherd. I have been surprised to consider that the only obvious
employment, except wood-chopping, ice-cutting, or the like
business, which ever to my knowledge detained at Walden Pond for a
whole half day any of my fellow-citizens, whether fathers or
children of the town, with just one exception, was fishing.
Commonly they did not think that they were lucky, or well paid for
their time, unless they got a long string of fish, though they had
the opportunity of seeing the pond all the while. They might go
there a thousand times before the sediment of fishing would sink to
the bottom and leave their purpose pure; but no doubt such a
clarifying process would be going on all the while. The governor
and his council faintly remember the pond, for they went a-fishing
there when they were boys; but now they are too old and dignified
to go a-fishing, and so they know it no more forever. Yet even they
expect to go to heaven at last. If the legislature regards it, it
is chiefly to regulate the number of hooks to be used there; but
they know nothing about the hook of hooks with which to angle for
the pond itself, impaling the legislature for a bait. Thus, even in
civilized communities, the embryo man passes through the hunter
stage of development.
I have found repeatedly, of late years, that I
cannot fish without falling a little in self-respect. I have tried
it again and again. I have skill at it, and, like many of my
fellows, a certain instinct for it, which revives from time to
time, but always when I have done I feel that it would have been
better if I had not fished. I think that I do not mistake. It is a
faint intimation, yet so are the first streaks of morning. There is
unquestionably this instinct in me which belongs to the lower
orders of creation; yet with every year I am less a fisherman,
though without more humanity or even wisdom; at present I am no
fisherman at all. But I see that if I were to live in a wilderness
I should again be tempted to become a fisher and hunter in earnest.
Beside, there is something essentially unclean about this diet and
all flesh, and I began to see where housework commences, and whence
the endeavor, which costs so much, to wear a tidy and respectable
appearance each day, to keep the house sweet and free from all ill
odors and sights. Having been my own butcher and scullion and cook,
as well as the gentleman for whom the dishes were served up, I can
speak from an unusually complete experience. The practical
objection to animal food in my case was its uncleanness; and,
besides, when I had caught and cleaned and cooked and eaten my
fish, they seemed not to have fed me essentially. It was
insignificant and unnecessary, and cost more than it came to. A
little bread or a few potatoes would have done as well, with less
trouble and filth. Like many of my contemporaries, I had rarely for
many years used animal food, or tea, or coffee, &c.; not so
much because of any ill effects which I had traced to them, as
because they were not agreeable to my imagination. The repugnance
to animal food is not the effect of experience, but is an instinct.
It appeared more beautiful to live low and fare hard in many
respects; and though I never did so, I went far enough to please my
imagination. I believe that every man who has ever been earnest to
preserve his higher or poetic faculties in the best condition has
been particularly inclined to abstain from animal food, and from
much food of any kind. It is a significant fact, stated by
entomologists, I find it in Kirby and Spence,es
that “some insects in their perfect state, though furnished with
organs of feeding, make no use of them;” and they lay it down as “a
general rule, that almost all insects in this state eat much less
than in that of larvae. The voracious caterpillar when transformed
into a butterfly,” .. “and the gluttonous maggot when become a
fly,” content themselves with a drop or two of honey or some other
sweet liquid. The abdomen under the wings of the butterfly still
represents the larva. This is the tid-bit which tempts his
insectivorous fate. The gross feeder is a man in the larva state;
and there are whole nations in that condition, nations without
fancy or imagination, whose vast abdomens betray them.
It is hard to provide and cook so simple and clean
a diet as will not offend the imagination; but this, I think, is to
be fed when we feed the body; they should both sit down at the same
table. Yet perhaps this may be done. The fruits eaten temperately
need not make us ashamed of our appetites, nor interrupt the
worthiest pursuits. But put an extra condiment into your dish, and
it will poison you. It is not worth the while to live by rich
cookery. Most men would feel shame if caught preparing with their
own hands precisely such a dinner, whether of animal or vegetable
food, as is every day prepared for them by others. Yet till this is
otherwise we are not civilized, and, if gentlemen and ladies, are
not true men and women. This certainly suggests what change is to
be made. It may be vain to ask why the imagination will not be
reconciled to flesh and fat. I am satisfied that it is not. Is it
not a reproach that man is a carniverous et
animal? True, he can and does live, in a great measure, by preying
on other animals; but this is a miserable way,—as any one who will
go to snaring rabbits, or slaughtering lambs, may learn,—and he
will be regarded as a benefactor of his race who shall teach man to
confine himself to a more innocent and wholesome diet. Whatever my
own practice may be, I have no doubt that it is a part of the
destiny of the human race, in its gradual improvement, to leave off
eating animals, as surely as the savage tribes have left off eating
each other when they came in contact with the more civilized.
If one listens to the faintest but constant
suggestions of his genius, which are certainly true, he sees not to
what extremes, or even insanity, it may lead him; and yet that way,
as he grows more resolute and faithful, his road lies. The faintest
assured objection which one healthy man feels will at length
prevail over the arguments and customs of mankind. No man ever
followed his genius till it misled him. Though the result were
bodily weakness, yet perhaps no one can say that the consequences
were to be regretted, for these were a life in conformity to higher
principies.If the day and the night are such that you greet them
with joy, and life emits a fragrance like flowers and sweet-scented
herbs, is more elastic, more starry, more immortal,—that is your
success. All nature is your congratulation, and you have cause
momentarily to bless yourself. The greatest gains and values are
farthest from being appreciated. We easily come to doubt if they
exist. We soon forget them. They are the highest reality. Perhaps
the facts most astounding and most real are never communicated by
man to man. The true harvest of my daily life is somewhat as
intangible and indescribable as the tints of morning or evening. It
is a little star-dust caught, a segment of the rainbow which I have
clutched.
Yet, for my part, I was never unusually squeamish;
I could sometimes eat a fried rat with a good relish, if it were
necessary. I am glad to have drunk water so long, for the same
reason that I prefer the natural sky to an opium-eater’s heaven. I
would fain keep sober always; and there are infinite degrees of
drunkenness. I believe that water is the only drink for a wise man;
wine is not so noble a liquor; and think of dashing the hopes of a
morning with a cup of warm coffee, or of an evening with a dish of
tea! Ah, how low I fall when I am tempted by them! Even music may
be intoxicating. Such apparently slight causes destroyed Greece and
Rome, and will destroy England and America. Of all ebriosity, who
does not prefer to be intoxicated by the air he breathes? I have
found it to be the most serious objection to coarse labors long
continued, that they compelled me to eat and drink coarsely also.
But to tell the truth, I find myself at present somewhat less
particular in these respects. I carry less religion to the table,
ask no blessing; not because I am wiser than I was, but, I am
obliged to confess, because, however much it is to be regretted,
with years I have grown more coarse and indifferent. Perhaps these
questions are entertained only in youth, as most believe of poetry.
My practice is “nowhere,” my opinion is here. Nevertheless I am far
from regarding myself as one of those privileged ones to whom the
vedeu
refers when it says, that “he who has true faith in the Omnipresent
Supreme Being may eat all that exists,” that is, is not bound to
inquire what is his food, or who prepares it; and even in their
case it is to be observed, as a Hindoo commentator has remarked,
that the Vedant limits this privilege to “the time of
distress.”
Who has not sometimes derived an inexpressible
satisfaction from his food in which appetite had no share? I have
been thrilled to think that I owed a mental perception to the
commonly gross sense of taste, that I have been inspired through
the palate, that some berries which I had eaten on a hill-side had
fed my genius. “The soul not being mistress of herself,” says
Thseng-tseu, “one looks, and one does not see; one listens, and one
does not hear; one eats, and one does not know the savor of
food.”ev He
who distinguishes the true savor of his food can never be a
glutton; he who does not cannot be otherwise. A puritan may go to
his brown-bread crust with as gross an appetite as ever an alderman
to his turtle. Not that food which entereth into the mouth defileth
a man, but the appetite with which it is eaten. It is neither the
quality nor the quantity, but the devotion to sensual savors; when
that which is eaten is not a viand to sustain our animal, or
inspire our spiritual life, but food for the worms that possess us.
If the hunter has a taste for mud-turtles, muskrats, and other such
savage tid-bits, the fine lady indulges a taste for jelly made of a
calf’s foot, or for sardines from over the sea, and they are even.
He goes to the mill-pond, she to her preserve-pot. The wonder is
how they, how you and I, can live this slimy beastly life, eating
and drinking.
Our whole life is startlingly moral. There is never
an instant’s truce between virtue and vice. Goodness is the only
investment that never fails. In the music of the harp which
trembles round the world it is the insisting on this which thrills
us. The harp is the travelling patterer for the Universe’s
Insurance Company, recommending its laws, and our little goodness
is all the assessment that we pay. Though the youth at last grows
indifferent, the laws of the universe are not indifferent, but are
forever on the side of the most sensitive. Listen to every zephyr
for some reproof, for it is surely there, and he is unfortunate who
does not hear it. We cannot touch a string or move a stop but the
charming moral transfixes us. Many an irksome noise, go a long way
off, is heard as music, a proud sweet satire on the meanness of our
lives.
We are conscious of an animal in us, which awakens
in proportion as our higher nature slumbers. It is reptile and
sensual, and perhaps cannot be wholly expelled; like the worms
which, even in life and health, occupy our bodies. Possibly we may
withdraw from it, but never change its nature. I fear that it may
enjoy a certain health of its own; that we may be well, yet not
pure. The other day I picked up the lower jaw of a hog, with white
and sound teeth and tusks, which suggested that there was an animal
health and vigor distinct from the spiritual. This creature
succeeded by other means than temperance and purity. “That in which
men differ from brute beasts,” says Mencius, “is a thing very
inconsiderable ; the common herd lose it very soon; superior men
preserve it carefully.” ew Who
knows what sort of life would result if we had attained to purity?
If I knew so wise a man as could teach me purity I would go to seek
him forthwith. “A command over our passions, and over the external
senses of the body, and good acts, are declared by the Ved to be
indispensable in the mind’s approximation to God.”ex Yet
the spirit can for the time pervade and control every member and
function of the body, and transmute what in form is the grossest
sensuality into purity and devotion. The generative energy, which,
when we are loose, dissipates and makes us unclean, when we are
continent invigorates and inspires us. Chastity is the flowering of
man; and what are called Genius, Heroism, Holiness, and the like,
are but various fruits which succeed it. Man flows at once to God
when the channel of purity is open. By turns our purity inspires
and our impurity casts us down. He is blessed who is assured that
the animal is dying out in him day by day, and the divine being
established. Perhaps there is none but has cause for shame on
account of the inferior and brutish nature to which he is allied. I
fear that we are such gods or demigods only as fauns and
satyrs,‡ the divine allied to beasts, the creatures of
appetite, and that, to some extent, our very life is our
disgrace.—
“How happy’s he who hath due place assigned
To his beasts and disaforested his mind!
To his beasts and disaforested his mind!

Can use his horse, goat, wolf, and ev’ry
beast,
And is not ass himself to all the rest!
Else man not only is the herd of swine,
But he’s those devils too which did incline
Them to a headlong rage, and made them worse.“ey
And is not ass himself to all the rest!
Else man not only is the herd of swine,
But he’s those devils too which did incline
Them to a headlong rage, and made them worse.“ey
All sensuality is one, though it takes many forms;
all purity is one. It is the same whether a man eat, or drink, or
cohabit, or sleep sensually. They are but one appetite, and we only
need to see a person do any one of these things to know how great a
sensualist he is. The impure can neither stand nor sit with purity.
When the reptile is attacked at one mouth of his burrow, he shows
himself at another. If you would be chaste, you must be temperate.
What is chastity? How shall a man know if he is chaste? He shall
not know it. We have heard of this virtue, but we know not what it
is. We speak conformably to the rumor which we have heard. From
exertion come wisdom and purity; from sloth ignorance and
sensuality. In the student sensuality is a sluggish habit of mind.
An unclean person is universally a slothful one, one who sits by a
stove, whom the sun shines on prostrate, who reposes without being
fatigued. If you would avoid uncleanness, and all the sins, work
earnestly, though it be at cleaning a stable. Nature is hard to be
overcome, but she must be overcome. What avails it that you are
Christian, if you are not purer than the heathen, if you deny
yourself no more, if you are not more religious? I know of many
systems of religion esteemed heathenish whose precepts fill the
reader with shame, and provoke him to new endeavors, though it be
to the performance of rites merely.
I hesitate to say these things, but it is not
because of the subject,—I care not how obscene my words
are,—but because I cannot speak of them without betraying my
impurity. We discourse freely without shame of one form of
sensuality, and are silent about another. We are so degraded that
we cannot speak simply of the necessary functions of human nature.
In earlier ages, in some countries, every function was reverently
spoken of and regulated by law. Nothing was too trivial for the
Hindoo lawgiver, however offensive it may be to modern taste. He
teaches how to eat, drink, cohabit, void excrement and urine, and
the like, elevating what is mean, and does not falsely excuse
himself by calling these things trifles.
Every man is the builder of a temple, called his
body, to the god he worships, after a style purely his own, nor can
he get off by hammering marble instead. We are all sculptors and
painters, and our material is our own flesh and blood and bones.
Any nobleness begins at once to refine a man’s features, any
meanness or sensuality to imbrute them.
John Farmer sat at his door one September evening,
after a hard day’s work, his mind still running on his labor more
or less. Having bathed he sat down to recreate his intellectual
man. It was a rather cool evening, and some of his neighbors were
apprehending a frost. He had not attended to the train of his
thoughts long when he heard some one playing on a flute, and that
sound harmonized with his mood. Still he thought of his work; but
the burden of his thought was, that though this kept running in his
head, and he found himself planning and contriving it against his
will, yet it concerned him very little. It was no more than the
scurf of his skin, which was constantly shuffled off. But the notes
of the flute came home to his ears out of a different sphere from
that he worked in, and suggested work for certain faculties which
slumbered in him. They gently did away with the street, and the
village, and the state in which he lived. A voice said to him,—Why
do you stay here and live this mean moiling life, when a glorious
existence is possible for you? Those same stars twinkle over other
fields than these.—But how to come out of this condition and
actually migrate thither? All that he could think of was to
practise some new austerity, to let his mind descend into his body
and redeem it, and treat himself with ever increasing
respect.