THE ELEMENTS OF PREDICTION
1) MEASURABILITY OF OUTCOME
4 obvious, clear
3 discoverable and shared definition
1 discoverable, but fluid or inconsistent
0 not measurable/undiscoverable
2) VANTAGE
3 perspective view
2 proxy view
0 obstructed or no view
3) IMMINENCE
4 imminent
2 foreseeable
0 remote
4) CONTEXT
3 fully revealed
0 concealed
5) PRE-INCIDENT INDICATORS
5 several, reliable, detectable
3 few, reliable, detectable
0 unreliable or undetectable
6) EXPERIENCE
5 extensive with both outcomes
3 with both outcomes
2 one outcome
0 elemental/partial/irrelevant
7) COMPARABLE EVENTS
4 substantively comparable
1 comparable
0 not comparable
8) OBJECTIVITY
2 believes either outcome is possible
0 believes only one outcome or neither outcome is possible
9) INVESTMENT
3 invested in outcome
1 emotionally invested in outcome
0 uninvested in outcome
10) REPLICABILITY
5 easily replicable
2 replicable by sample or proxy
0 impractical or not replicable
11) KNOWLEDGE
2 relevant & accurate
0 partial or inaccurate
This scale helps determine if a given prediction can be made successfully (which is distinct from whether it will be made successfully). To evaluate a prediction, answer the eleven questions described in chapter 6 by selecting from the range of possible answers above. Then add up the total points.
22 or lower: | Not reliably predictable; a matter of chance |
23–27: | Low likelihood of success |
28–32: | Predictable |
32 or higher: | Highly predictable |
Note: The vantage question asks if the person making the prediction is in a position to observe the pre-incident indicators and context. If you can observe the situation and pre-incident indicators directly, then you have a Perspective View, but if you can only observe them through some medium (such as reports or other evidence), select Proxy View.
Following are some popular predictions, scored
on the assumption that the person answering the question cares
about the outcome and is as objective as possible:
WHO WILL WIN THE OSCAR?
|
22 | mere chance |
WILL A THREATENER WHO IS KNOWN
AND IDENTIFIED SHOW UP IN THE PRESIDENT’S ENVIRONMENT WITH A
WEAPON?
|
33 | highly predictable |
WILL A GOOD FRIEND DEFAULT ON A
LOAN?
|
33 | highly predictable |
WILL THE DOG IN FRONT OF ME
ATTACK ME?
|
34 | highly predictable |
WILL A PUBLISHER BE INTERESTED
IN A GIVEN BOOK IDEA?
|
37 | highly predictable |
HOW WILL A GIVEN BOOK SELL?
|
29 | predictable |
WILL A GIVEN GUEST DO WELL ON A
TALK SHOW NEXT WEEK?
|
30 | predictable |
WILL A GIVEN STAND-UP COMEDIAN
DO WELL ON A TALK SHOW NEXT WEEK?
|
36 | highly predictable |
(This prediction ranks higher than that of a
regular guest because we all share a common definition of what it
means for a comedian to do well: The audience laughs. The
definition of what it means for a regular guest to do well is more
fluid—the audience could be informed, amused, or moved. This
prediction also scores higher because a comedian’s performance can
be replicated with another audience first.)
WILL THERE BE A MAJOR EARTHQUAKE
IN LOS ANGELES THIS YEAR?
|
22 | mere chance |
WILL THE PLANE I AM ON CRASH?
|
24 | low success prediction |
WILL MY SIX-YEAR OLD LIKE A
PARTICULAR FOOD?
|
34 | highly predictable |
WILL I QUIT SMOKING NEXT WEEK?
|
35 | highly predictable |
WHICH PASSENGER BOARDING A
FLIGHT, IF ANY, WILL ATTEMPT TO HIJACK THE PLANE?
|
19 | mere chance |
WHICH PERSON IN THE FRONT ROW,
IF ANY, WILL LEAVE HIS SEAT AND TRY TO GET ON STAGE DURING A
CONCERT?
|
33 | highly predictable |
WILL A GIVEN EMPLOYEE WHO KNOWS
HE IS TO BE FIRED GO ON A SHOOTING SPREE?
|
35 | highly predictable |
WILL AN ABUSIVE HUSBAND ESCALATE
HIS VIOLENCE WHEN HE LEARNS HIS WIFE HAS FILED FOR DIVORCE?
|
35 | highly predictable |