8 scale
“If you don’t scale the mountain, you can’t view the plain.”
CHINESE PROVERB
scale \'skāl\ n
5 b: a distinctive relative size, extent, or degree
The visual principle of scale is defined as a relative, progressive classification of proportion or a degree of size, amount, importance, and rank in a composition.
Proportion and scale are related design principles in visual communications. Proportion refers to the size relationships of design elements relative to the space they occupy in an overall composition. Scale refers to the size comparisons of the design elements in a composition, or a size relationship when comparing one design element to another.
On a day-to-day basis, we all make scale comparisons relating to size, distance, and weight.
These types of visual comparisons are usually based on known and familiar experiences that constantly provide us with a visual reference or orientation. For example, a skyscraper or snow-capped mountain on the horizon may be difficult to judge in terms of size. However, when we juxtapose either of these with a familiar scale reference such as a person, car, or even a book, it is easier for us to immediately quantify and understand.
Types of Scale
The principle of scale can be categorized as either objective or subjective.
Objective
This type of scale is the literal, or objective, definition of scale and is the actual dimensions of a physical object or a literal correlation between an actual object and its graphic representation. An example of objective or literal scale is a “scale” drawing of a chair that is realized on a sheet of 8 1/2 X 11-inch (21.6 X 28 cm) paper; however, the actual chair in “real” scale is of a size to accommodate the human figure.
This type of scale is also used in maps, architectural plans, and models. It is a scale ratio defined numerically as two quantities separated by a colon (:). For example, a scale noted as 1:50 is one unit of measurement, such as inches or meters, and represents fifty of the same units at full size.
1935
Normandie Poster
ADOLPHE JEAN-MARIE MOURON (A. M. CASSANDRE)
Paris, FR
A. M. Cassandre and the Art of the Modern Poster
ADOLPHE JEAN-MARIE MOURON, also known as A. M. Cassandre (1901–1968), was one of the most influential poster designers of the twentieth century. Born in Khrakov, Ukraine, in 1901, Cassandre spent most of his life in Paris following his family’s emigration to France during the Russian Revolution of 1917. As a young man, he studied drawing and painting at the Ecole des Beaux-Arts and at the Academie Julian.
Cassandre was a man of many talents and, like most creative individuals, he experimented throughout his life and career with a wide variety of techniques and styles. From 1922 to 1940, he devoted himself to the art of the poster. In the latter part of his life, he returned to his first love, painting, as well as teaching graphic design at the Ecole des Arts Decoratifs and then at the Ecole d’Art Graphique.
In 1936 his work was exhibited at the Museum of Modern Art in New York City, which led to numerous cover commissions from Harper’s Bazaar.
At the age of 24, he furthered his growing reputation with works such as Bucheron (Woodcutter), a poster created for a French cabinetmaker that won first prize at the 1925 Exposition Internationale des Arts Decoratifs et Industriels Modernes. Additionally, his innovative approach for the Dubonnet wine company was among the first posters and advertisements designed to be seen and read by passengers in moving vehicles.
His love of fine art, combined with his typographic sensitivity and natural ability to combine these two distinct disciplines into coherent and visually dynamic design solutions, enabled Cassandre to become one of the earliest and most successful commercial artists and poster designers in the world. Inspired by surrealism and cubism, his posters are memorable for their innovative graphic solutions and their frequent references to twentieth-century avant-garde painters such as Max Ernst (German, 1891–1976) and Pablo Picasso (Spanish, 1881–1973).
Normandie, an iconic poster that afforded him international fame and recognition, is a primary example of how Cassandre used scale as a dynamic compositional element in all of his work.
The poster’s frontal view is completely symmetrical with an extreme upward angle that emphasizes the ship’s monumental scale and art deco lines. It is composed in a manner that draws our eyes irresistibly upward to the sky. The immense scale of the ship’s prow is further emphasized by the French flag at the prow’s apex as well as a group of tiny gulls and sea foam close to the horizon line where ship meets sea. This reductive, erect composition towers over the monolithic text NORMANDIE that also functions as a stable, typographic pedestal for the image of the ship.
The majority of Cassandre’s posters were based on a true sense of proportion and scale, which governed their overall structure, rhythm, and final composition. His primary objective was always to make the object the center of a poster’s attention. Through exaggerated scale, he was able to celebrate the geometry of form as well as use this fundamental principle as a memorable, storytelling device.
Subjective
This type of scale refers to a person’s impression of an actual object. For example, a car or a house may be described as having an immense or intimate scale due to how it relates to our physical selves, as well as our knowledge and familiarity with cars and houses. Scale that is relative only to our own personal experiences is, therefore, subjective in nature.
Effective Use of Scale
Scale can be used as an effective design principle to create variety, emphasis, and visual hierarchy in any visual communication. A proper use of scale contributes to the stability, visual comfort, and memorable aspects of any composition, while an incorrect scale will create discomfort, dysfunction, and a cramped awareness in a composition.
An element within a composition can appear larger or smaller depending on the size, placement, color, texture, and visual weight of the elements around it. Additionally, contrast in size can create visual emphasis, hierarchy, depth, movement, and tension within any composition.
When compositional elements are all the same size and equal in visual scale, the composition will appear flat and one-dimensional. It will lack contrast, tension, rhythm, and movment. It’s as if we were listening to a musical composition and heard only one, continuous, monotonous note—always the same, never fluctuating in tone or resonance. All of the previous design elements referenced, when used in an effective, appropriate, and meaningful manner, can create a sense of depth and movement in any visual composition. Scale is also an essential design element and critical consideration in achieving this end result.
Scale can be used to direct a viewer’s attention through a singular design element, such as an image or typography, as well as a composition of multiple visual elements.
A graphic designer also needs to consider scale in practical and functional ways. Professional work today requires graphic designers to consider a variety of different media and vehicles for conveying their work. From the traditional realms of printed matter, to the small-scale requirements of the digital world of websites and electronic interfaces, and the large-scale requirements of environmental graphics and exhibitions, scale is an important and constant consideration.
Context
The visual principle of scale is also fully dependent on context. In visual communications, familiar comparisons are less intuitive; therefore, you need to rely upon scale to communicate those visual comparisons in an immediate and understandable way.
We all have experienced the jarring visual phenomenon of first printing out a sheet of paper with work we have been designing on screen, and to our surprise, something is amiss. We have methodically evaluated and resolved a visual composition in one scale (on screen) and now expect the same spatial and visual relationships to be achieved and maintained at a completely different scale when they are printed out on an 8 1/2 X 11-inch (21.6 X 28 cm) sheet of paper. This happens often among most designers today.
We automatically make comparisons every time we receive sensory information. Objects are “too hot” or “safe to touch” because we immediately compare them to our previous experiences. Additionally, we tend to make size comparisons based on our own relationships to human scale. For example, our perception of scale in the adult world is completely different from our perception as small children.
Optical Effects and Scale
Scale is a fundamental design principle that also helps the viewer perceive spatial illusion, such as the size of objects and their relative scale in a composition. Small elements recede, larger ones come forward. Compositional elements that are closer to us appear larger than objects of the same size that are located farther away.
The following compositonal treatments can be used to achieve optical and spatial illusions in a visual composition:
Overlapping and Position
Overlapping is an optical device that can automatically interpret scale and depth, as well as evoke either realistic or unusual spatial effects. A compositional element partially hidden by another appears to be located behind it in space and therefore will appear smaller in scale. Each element obscuring part of another helps the viewer make spatial sense of the composition.
Similarly, the position of elements relative to the overall picture plane helps the viewer organize them in a composition. The area at the bottom of the picture plane is often seen as foreground—the portion of a visual composition that is closest to the viewer. The area at the center of the picture plane is often interpreted as middle ground—the portion of a visual composition of varying depth that is at midpoint distance to the viewer. The upper area of a visual composition is often seen as background (with the exception of landscapes in which the sky seems to project forward from the background over the head of the viewer). In Western culture, we tend to interpret the lower portion of a composition as closer than the upper portion because representational paintings in art history have been composed in this manner.
Atmospheric Perspective
In addition to overlapping and position in a composition, you can rely on atmospheric perspective to further indicate scale and spatial depth. This effect can be used when there is need for a specific element or area to appear more distant than the other elements in a composition. This can be achieved by using softer edges, less value or contrast, and less detail in these elements so that they appear farther back in a compositional space.
When compositional elements are extremely close to the viewer, they may be seen in reverse atmospheric perspective: The closest elements are blurred or brought out of focus, with the sharpest edges and strongest value contrast in the elements that are a bit farther away.
No matter what size a designer’s work will be when finally realized, it must have its own true sense of scale.