LAW 18
DO NOT BUILD FORTRESSES TO PROTECT
YOURSELF—ISOLATION IS DANGEROUS
JUDGMENT
The world is dangerous and enemies are
everywhere—everyone has to protect themselves. A fortress
seems the safest. But isolation exposes you to more dangers than it
Protects you from—it cuts you off from valuable information, it
makes you conspicuous and an easy target. Better to circulate among
people, find allies, mingle. You are shielded from your enemies by
the crowd.
TRANSGRESSION OF THE LAW
Ch‘in Shih Huang Ti, the first emperor of China
(221-210 B.C.), was the mightiest man of his day. His empire was
vaster and more powerful than that of Alexander the Great. He had
conquered all of the kingdoms surrounding his own kingdom of Ch’in
and unified them into one massive realm called China. But in the
last years of his life, few, if anyone, saw him.
The emperor lived in the most magnificent palace
built to that date, in the capital of Hsien-yang. The palace had
270 pavilions; all of these were connected by secret underground
passageways, allowing the emperor to move through the palace
without anyone seeing him. He slept in a different room every
night, and anyone who inadvertently laid eyes on him was instantly
beheaded. Only a handful of men knew his whereabouts, and if they
revealed it to anyone, they, too, were put to death.
The first emperor had grown so terrified of human
contact that when he had to leave the palace he traveled incognito,
disguising himself carefully. On one such trip through the
provinces, he suddenly died. His body was borne back to the capital
in the emperor’s carriage, with a cart packed with salted fish
trailing behind it to cover up the smell of the rotting corpse—no
one was to know of his death. He died alone, far from his wives,
his family, his friends, and his courtiers, accompanied only by a
minister and a handful of eunuchs.
IIII MASQU I OI IIII. RI.DDI ATH
The “Red Death” had long devastated the
country. No pestilence had ever been so fatal, or so hideous. Blood
was its Avatur and its seal—the redness and horror of blood. There
were sharp pains, and sudden dizziness, and then profuse bleeding
at the pores, with dissolution.... And the whole seizure, progress,
and termination of the disease, were the incidents of half an hour.
But the Prince Prospero was happy and dauntless and sagacious. When
his dominions were half-depopulated, he summoned to his presence a
thousand hale and light-hearted friends from among the knight, and
dames of his court, and with these retired to the deep
seclusion of one of his castellated abbeys. This was an extensive
and magnificent structure, the creation of the prince’s own
eccentric yet august taste. A strong and lofty wall girdled it in.
This wall had gates of iron. The courtier.s, having entered,
brought furnaces and massy hammers and welded the bolts. They
resolved to leave means neither of ingress nor egress to the sudden
impulses of despair or of frenzy from within. The abbey was amply
provisioned. With such precautions the courtiers might bid
defiance to contagion. The external world could take care of itself
In the meantime it was folly to grieve, or to think. The prince had
provided all the appliances of pleasure. There were buffoons, there
were improvisatori, there were ballet-dancers, there were
musicians, there was Beauty, there was wine. All these and security
were within. Without was the “Red Death.” It was toward the close
of the fifth or sixth month of his seclusion, and while the
pestilence raged most furiously abroad, that the Prince Prospero
entertained his thousand friends at a masked ball of the most
unusual magnificence. It was a voluptuous scene, that
masquerade.... ... And the revel went whirlingly on, until at
length there commenced the sounding of midnight upon the clock....
And thus too, it happened, perhaps, that before the last echoes of
the last chime had utterly sunk into silence, there were many
individuals in the crowd who had found leisure to become aware of
the presence of a masked fzgecre which had arrested the attention
of no single individual before.... The figure was tall and gaunt,
and shrouded from head to foot in the habiliments of the grave. The
mask which concealed the visage was made so nearly to
resemble the countenance of a stiffened corpse that the closest
scrutiny must have had difficulty in detecting the cheat. And yet
all this might have been endured, if not approved, by the mad
revellers around. But the mummer had gone so far as to assume the
type of the Red Death. His vesture was dabbled in blood—and his
broad brow, with all the features of the face, was sprinkled with
the scarlet horror ... ... A throng of the revellers at once
threw themselves into the black apartment, and, seizing the mummer,
whose tall figure stood erect and motionless within the shadow of
the ebony clock, gasped in unutterable horror at finding the grave
cerements and corpse-like mask, which they handled with so violent
a rudeness, untenanted by any tangible form. And now was
acknowledged the presence of the Red Death. He had come like a
thief in the night. And one by one dropped the revellers in the
blood-bedewed halls of their revel, and died each in the despairing
posture of his fall. And the life of the ebony clock went out with
that of the last of the gay. And the flames of the tripods expired.
And Darkness and Decay and the Red Death held illimitable dominion
over all.
THE MASQUE OF THE RED DEAIH, EDGAR ALLAN POE,
1809-1849
Interpretation
Shih Huang Ti started off as the king of Ch’in, a
fearless warrior of unbridled ambition. Writers of the time
described him as a man with “a waspish nose, eyes like slits, the
voice of a jackal, and the heart of a tiger or wolf.” He could be
merciful sometimes, but more often he “swallowed men up without a
scruple.” It was through trickery and violence that he conquered
the provinces surrounding his own and created China, forging a
single nation and culture out of many. He broke up the feudal
system, and to keep an eye on the many members of the royal
families that were scattered across the realm’s various kingdoms,
he moved 120,000 of them to the capital, where he housed the most
important courtiers in the vast palace of Hsien-yang. He
consolidated the many walls on the borders and built them into the
Great Wall of China. He standardized the country’s laws, its
written language, even the size of its cartwheels.
As part of this process of unification, however,
the first emperor outlawed the writings and teachings of Confucius,
the philosopher whose ideas on the moral life had already become
virtually a religion in Chinese culture. On Shih Huang Ti’s order,
thousands of books relating to Confucius were burned, and anyone
who quoted Confucius was to be beheaded. This made many enemies for
the emperor, and he grew constantly afraid, even paranoid. The
executions mounted. A contemporary, the writer Han-fei-tzu, noted
that “Ch’in has been victorious for four generations, yet has lived
in constant terror and apprehension of destruction.”
As the emperor withdrew deeper and deeper into the
palace to protect himself, he slowly lost control of the realm.
Eunuchs and ministers enacted political policies without his
approval or even his knowledge; they also plotted against him. By
the end, he was emperor in name only, and was so isolated that
barely anyone knew he had died. He had probably been poisoned by
the same scheming ministers who encouraged his isolation.
That is what isolation brings: Retreat into a
fortress and you lose contact with the sources of your power. You
lose your ear for what is happening around you, as well as a sense
of proportion. Instead of being safer, you cut yourself off from
the kind of knowledge on which your life depends. Never enclose
yourself so far from the streets that you cannot hear what is
happening around you, including the plots against you.
OBSERVANCE OF THE LAW
Louis XIV had the palace of Versailles built for
him and his court in the 1660s, and it was like no other royal
palace in the world. As in a beehive, everything revolved around
the royal person. He lived surrounded by the nobility, who were
allotted apartments nestled around his, their closeness to him
dependent on their rank. The king’s bedroom occupied the literal
center of the palace and was the focus of everyone’s attention.
Every morning the king was greeted in this room by a ritual known
as the lever.
At eight A.M., the king’s first valet, who slept at
the foot of the royal bed, would awaken His Majesty. Then pages
would open the door and admit those who had a function in the
lever. The order of their entry was precise: First came the
king’s illegitimate sons and his grandchildren, then the princes
and princesses of the blood, and then his physician and surgeon.
There followed the grand officers of the wardrobe, the king’s
official reader, and those in charge of entertaining the king. Next
would arrive various government officials, in ascending order of
rank. Last but not least came those attending the lever by
special invitation. By the end of the ceremony, the room would be
packed with well over a hundred royal attendants and
visitors.
The day was organized so that all the palace’s
energy was directed at and passed through the king. Louis was
constantly attended by courtiers and officials, all asking for his
advice and judgment. To all their questions he usually replied, “I
shall see.”
As Saint-Simon noted, “If he turned to someone,
asked him a question, made an insignificant remark, the eyes of all
present were turned on this person. It was a distinction that was
talked of and increased prestige.” There was no possibility of
privacy in the palace, not even for the king—every room
communicated with another, and every hallway led to larger rooms
where groups of nobles gathered constantly. Everyone’s actions were
interdependent, and nothing and no one passed unnoticed: “The king
not only saw to it that all the high nobility was present at his
court,” wrote Saint-Simon, “he demanded the same of the minor
nobility. At his lever and coucher, at his meals, in
his gardens of Versailles, he always looked about him, noticing
everything. He was offended if the most distinguished nobles did
not live permanently at court, and those who showed themselves
never or hardly ever, incurred his full displeasure. If one of
these desired something, the king would say proudly: ‘I do not know
him,’ and the judgment was irrevocable.”
Interpretation
Louis XIV came to power at the end of a terrible
civil war, the Fronde. A principal instigator of the war had been
the nobility, which deeply resented the growing power of the throne
and yearned for the days of feudalism, when the lords ruled their
own fiefdoms and the king had little authority over them. The
nobles had lost the civil war, but they remained a fractious,
resentful lot.
The construction of Versailles, then, was far more
than the decadent whim of a luxury-loving king. It served a crucial
function: The king could keep an eye and an ear on everyone and
everything around him. The once proud nobility was reduced to
squabbling over the right to help the king put on his robes in the
morning. There was no possibility here of privacy—no possibility of
isolation. Louis XIV very early grasped the truth that for a king
to isolate himself is gravely dangerous. In his absence,
conspiracies will spring up like mushrooms after rain, animosities
will crystallize into factions, and rebellion will break out before
he has the time to react. To combat this, sociability and openness
must not only be encouraged, they must be formally organized and
channeled.
These conditions at Versailles lasted for Louis’s
entire reign, some fifty years of relative peace and tranquillity.
Through it all, not a pin dropped without Louis hearing it.
Solitude is dangerous to reason, without
being favorable to virtue....
Remember that the solitary mortal is certainly luxurious,
probably superstitious, and possibly mad.
Dr. Samuel John son, 1709-1784
Remember that the solitary mortal is certainly luxurious,
probably superstitious, and possibly mad.
Dr. Samuel John son, 1709-1784
KEYS TO POWER
Machiavelli makes the argument that in a strictly
military sense a fortress is invariably a mistake. It becomes a
symbol of power’s isolation, and is an easy target for its
builders’ enemies. Designed to defend you, fortresses actually cut
you off from help and cut into your flexibility. They may appear
impregnable, but once you retire to one, everyone knows where you
are; and a siege does not have to succeed to turn your fortress
into a prison. With their small and confined spaces, fortresses are
also extremely vulnerable to the plague and contagious diseases. In
a strategic sense, the isolation of a fortress provides no
protection, and actually creates more problems than it
solves.
Because humans are social creatures by nature,
power depends on social interaction and circulation. To make
yourself powerful you must place yourself at the center of things,
as Louis XIV did at Versailles. All activity should revolve around
you, and you should be aware of everything happening on the street,
and of anyone who might be hatching plots against you. The danger
for most people comes when they feel threatened. In such times they
tend to retreat and close ranks, to find security in a kind of
fortress. In doing so, however, they come to rely for information
on a smaller and smaller circle, and lose perspective on events
around them. They lose maneuverability and become easy targets, and
their isolation makes them paranoid. As in warfare and most games
of strategy, isolation often precedes defeat and death.
In moments of uncertainty and danger, you need to
fight this desire to turn inward. Instead, make yourself more
accessible, seek out old allies and make new ones, force yourself
into more and more different circles. This has been the trick of
powerful people for centuries.
The Roman statesman Cicero was born into the lower
nobility, and had little chance of power unless he managed to make
a place for himself among the aristocrats who controlled the city.
He succeeded brilliantly, identifying everyone with influence and
figuring out how they were connected to one another. He mingled
everywhere, knew everyone, and had such a vast network of
connections that an enemy here could easily be counterbalanced by
an ally there.
The French statesman Talleyrand played the game the
same way. Although he came from one of the oldest aristocratic
families in France, he made a point of always staying in touch with
what was happening in the streets of Paris, allowing him to foresee
trends and troubles. He even got a certain pleasure out of mingling
with shady criminal types, who supplied him with valuable
information. Every time there was a crisis, a transition of
power—the end of the Directory, the fall of Napoleon, the
abdication of Louis XVIII—he was able to survive and even thrive,
because he never closed himself up in a small circle but always
forged connections with the new order.
This law pertains to kings and queens, and to those
of the highest power: The moment you lose contact with your people,
seeking security in isolation, rebellion is brewing. Never imagine
yourself so elevated that you can afford to cut yourself off from
even the lowest echelons. By retreating to a fortress, you make
yourself an easy target for your plotting subjects, who view your
isolation as an insult and a reason for rebellion.
Since humans are such social creatures, it follows
that the social arts that make us pleasant to be around can be
practiced only by constant exposure and circulation. The more you
are in contact with others, the more graceful and at ease you
become. Isolation, on the other hand, engenders an awkwardness in
your gestures, and leads to further isolation, as people start
avoiding you.
In 1545 Duke Cosimo I de’ Medici decided that to
ensure the immortality of his name he would commission frescoes for
the main chapel of the church of San Lorenzo in Florence. He had
many great painters to choose from, and in the end he picked Jacopo
da Pontormo. Getting on in years, Pontormo wanted to make these
frescoes his chef d’oeuvre and legacy. His first decision was to
close the chapel off with walls, partitions, and blinds. He wanted
no one to witness the creation of his masterpiece, or to steal his
ideas. He would outdo Michelangelo himself. When some young men
broke into the chapel out of curiosity, Jacopo sealed it off even
further.
Pontormo filled the chapel’s ceiling with biblical
scenes—the Creation, Adam and Eve, Noah’s ark, on and on. At the
top of the middle wall he painted Christ in his majesty, raising
the dead on Judgment Day. The artist worked on the chapel for
eleven years, rarely leaving it, since he had developed a phobia
for human contact and was afraid his ideas would be stolen.
Pontormo died before completing the frescoes, and
none of them has survived. But the great Renaissance writer Vasari,
a friend of Pontormo’s who saw the frescoes shortly after the
artist’s death, left a description of what they looked like. There
was a total lack of proportion. Scenes bumped against scenes,
figures in one story being juxtaposed with those in another, in
maddening numbers. Pontormo had become obsessed with detail but had
lost any sense of the overall composition. Vasari left off his
description of the frescoes by writing that if he continued, “I
think I would go mad and become entangled in this painting, just as
I believe that in the eleven years of time Jacopo spent on it, he
entangled himself and anyone else who saw it.” Instead of crowning
Pontormo’s career, the work became his undoing.
These frescoes were visual equivalents of the
effects of isolation on the human mind: a loss of proportion, an
obsession with detail combined with an inability to see the larger
picture, a kind of extravagant ugliness that no longer
communicates. Clearly, isolation is as deadly for the creative arts
as for the social arts. Shakespeare is the most famous writer in
history because, as a dramatist for the popular stage, he opened
himself up to the masses, making his work accessible to people no
matter what their education and taste. Artists who hole themselves
up in their fortress lose a sense of proportion, their work
communicating only to their small circle. Such art remains cornered
and powerless.
Finally, since power is a human creation, it is
inevitably increased by contact with other people. Instead of
falling into the fortress mentality, view the world in the
following manner: It is like a vast Versailles, with every room
communicating with another. You need to be permeable, able to float
in and out of different circles and mix with different types. That
kind of mobility and social contact will protect you from plotters,
who will be unable to keep secrets from you, and from your enemies,
who will be unable to isolate you from your allies. Always on the
move, you mix and mingle in the rooms of the palace, never sitting
or settling in one place. No hunter can fix his aim on such a
swift-moving creature.
Image: The Fortress. High
up on the hill, the citadel be
comes a symbol of all that is
hateful in power and authority.
The citizens of the town betray
you to the first enemy that comes.
Cut off from communication and in
telligence, the citadel falls with ease.
up on the hill, the citadel be
comes a symbol of all that is
hateful in power and authority.
The citizens of the town betray
you to the first enemy that comes.
Cut off from communication and in
telligence, the citadel falls with ease.
Authority: A good and wise prince, desirous of
maintaining that character, and to avoid giving the opportunity to
his sons to become oppressive, will never build fortresses, so that
they may place their reliance upon the good will of their subjects,
and not upon the strength of citadels. (Niccolò Machiavelli,
1469-1527)
REVERSAL
It is hardly ever right and propitious to choose
isolation. Without keeping an ear on what is happening in the
streets, you will be unable to protect yourself. About the only
thing that constant human contact cannot facilitate is thought. The
weight of society’s pressure to conform, and the lack of distance
from other people, can make it impossible to think clearly about
what is going on around you. As a temporary recourse, then,
isolation can help you to gain perspective. Many a serious thinker
has been produced in prisons, where we have nothing to do but
think. Machiavelli could write The Prince only once he found
himself in exile and isolated on a farm far from the political
intrigues of Florence.
The danger is, however, that this kind of isolation
will sire all kinds of strange and perverted ideas. You may gain
perspective on the larger picture, but you lose a sense of your own
smallness and limitations. Also, the more isolated you are, the
harder it is to break out of your isolation when you choose to—it
sinks you deep into its quicksand without your noticing. If you
need time to think, then, choose isolation only as a last resort,
and only in small doses. Be careful to keep your way back into
society open.