Epilogue

On January 27, 1965, Churchill’s coffin
was taken from his house in Hyde Park Gate to Westminster Hall,
where it lay in state. Over three hundred thousand people filed
slowly past the catafalque. At 9:45 on January 30 the coffin was
taken from Westminster to St. Paul’s on a gray gun carriage last
used at the funeral of Queen Victoria. The state funeral ordered by
Parliament was the first for a politician since Gladstone’s. But in
its somber magnificence its only precedent was the burial of the
Duke of Wellington in 1852. From the funeral, attended by the
queen, five other monarchs, and fifteen heads of state, the coffin
went across the Thames by boat, then from Waterloo Station by train
to Long Hanborough, the nearest station to Bladon, parish church of
Blenheim Palace. Churchill was buried in the churchyard next to his
father and mother and his brother, Jack, less than a mile from the
room in the palace where he was born.
In his ninety years, Churchill had spent
fifty-five years as a member of Parliament, thirty-one years as a
minister, and nearly nine years as prime minister. He had been
present at or fought in fifteen battles, and had been awarded
fourteen campaign medals, some with multiple clasps. He had been a
prominent figure in the First World War, and a dominant one in the
Second. He had published nearly 10 million words, more than most
professional writers in their lifetime, and painted over five
hundred canvases, more than most professional painters. He had
reconstructed a stately home and created a splendid garden with its
three lakes, which he had caused to be dug himself. He had built a
cottage and a garden wall. He was a fellow of the Royal Society, an
Elder Brother of Trinity House, a Lord Warden of the Cinque Ports,
a Royal Academician, a university chancellor, a Nobel Prizeman, a
Knight of the Garter, a Companion of Honour, and a member of the
Order of Merit. Scores of towns made him an honorary citizen,
dozens of universities awarded him honorary degrees, and thirteen
countries gave him medals. He hunted big game and won a score of
races. How many bottles of champagne he consumed is not recorded,
but it may be close to twenty thousand. He had a large and
much-loved family, and countless friends.
So Winston Churchill led a full life, and few
people are ever likely to equal it—its amplitude, variety, and
success on so many fronts. But all can learn from it, especially in
five ways.
The first lesson is: always aim high. As a child
Churchill received no positive encouragement from his father and
little from his mother. He was aware of failure at school. But he
still aimed high. He conquered his aversion to math, at least
enough to pass. He reinforced success in what he could do: write a
good English sentence. Conscious of his ignorance, he set himself
to master English history and to familiarize himself with great
chunks of literature. Once his own master, he played polo to win
the top award in the world. He got himself into five wars in quick
succession and became both a veteran of military lore and one of
the world’s most experienced (and highly paid) war correspondents.
Then he set his sights on the House of Commons and stayed there
(with one lapse) for over half a century. He sought power and got
it in growing amplitude. He never cadged or demeaned himself to get
office, but obtained it on his own terms. He sought to be prime
minister feeling only he could achieve certain things. In 1940 he
aimed not only high but at the highest—to rescue a stricken country
in danger of being demoralized, to put it firmly on its feet again,
and to carry it to salvation and victory. He did not always meet
his elevated targets, but by aiming high he always achieved
something worthwhile.
Lesson number two is: there is no substitute for
hard work. Churchill obscured this moral by his (for him) efficient
habit of spending a working morning in bed, telephoning, dictating,
and consulting. He also manifestly enjoyed his leisure activities,
for him another form of hard work, to keep himself fit and rested
and to enable himself to do his job at the top of his form. The
balance he maintained between flat-out work and creative and
restorative leisure is worth study by anyone holding a top
position. But he never evaded hard work itself: taking important
and dangerous decisions, the hardest form of work there is, in the
course of a sixteen-hour day. Or working on a speech to bring it as
near perfection as possible. No one ever worked harder than
Churchill to make himself a master orator. Or forcing himself to
travel long distances, often in acute discomfort and danger, to
meet the top statesmen face-to-face where his persuasive charm
could work best. He worked hard at everything to the best of his
ability: Parliament, administration, geopolitics and geostrategy,
writing books, painting, creating an idyllic house and garden,
seeing things and if possible doing things for himself. Mistakes he
made, constantly, but there was never anything shoddy or idle about
his work. He put tremendous energy into everything, and was able to
do this because (as he told me) he conserved and husbanded his
energy, too. There was an extraordinary paradox about his white,
apparently flabby body and the amount of muscle power he put into
life, always.
Third, and in its way most important, Churchill
never allowed mistakes, disaster—personal or national—accidents,
illnesses, unpopularity, and criticism to get him down. His powers
of recuperation, both in physical illness and in psychological
responses to abject failure, were astounding. To be blamed for the
dreadful failure and loss of life in the Dardanelles was a terrible
burden to carry. Churchill responded by fighting on the western
front, in great discomfort and danger, and then by doing a
magnificent job at the ministry of munitions. He made a fool of
himself over the abdication and was howled down by a united House
of Commons in one of the most savage scenes of personal humiliation
ever recorded. He scrambled to his feet and worked his way back. He
had courage, the most important of all virtues, and its companion,
fortitude. These strengths are inborn but they can also be
cultivated, and Churchill worked on them all his life. In a sense
his whole career was an exercise in how courage can be displayed,
reinforced, guarded and doled out carefully, heightened and
concentrated, conveyed to others. Those uncertain of their courage
can look to Churchill for reassurance and inspiration.
Fourth, Churchill wasted an extraordinarily small
amount of his time and emotional energy on the meannesses of life:
recrimination, shifting the blame onto others, malice, revenge
seeking, dirty tricks, spreading rumors, harboring grudges, waging
vendettas. Having fought hard, he washed his hands and went on to
the next contest. It is one reason for his success. There is
nothing more draining and exhausting than hatred. And malice is bad
for the judgment. Churchill loved to forgive and make up. His
treatment of Baldwin and Chamberlain after he became prime minister
is an object lesson in sublime magnanimity. Nothing gave him more
pleasure than to replace enmity with friendship, not least with the
Germans.
Finally, the absence of hatred left plenty of
room for joy in Churchill’s life. His face could light up in the
most extraordinarily attractive way as it became suffused with
pleasure at an unexpected and welcome event. Witness that
delightful moment at Number Ten when Baldwin gave him the
exchequer. Joy was a frequent visitor to Churchill’s psyche,
banishing boredom, despair, discomfort, and pain. He liked to share
his joy, and give joy. It must never be forgotten that Churchill
was happy with people. He insisted that the gates of Chartwell
should always be left open so that the people of Westerham were
encouraged to come in and enjoy the garden. He got on well with
nearly everyone who served him or worked with him, whatever their
degree. Being more than half American, he was never
class-conscious. When an old man, his bow to the young queen was a
work of art: slow, dignified, humble, and low. But he was bowing to
tradition and history more than to rank. He showed the people a
love of jokes, and was to them a source of many. No great leader
was ever laughed at, or with, more than Churchill. He loved to make
jokes and contrived to invent a large number in his long life. He
collected and told jokes, too. He liked to sing. Beaverbrook said:
“He did not sing in tune but he sang with energy and enthusiasm.”
He liked to sing “Ta-ra-ra-Boom-de-ay,” “Daisy, Daisy,” and old
Boer War songs. His favorite was “Take a Pair of Sparkling Eyes”
from Gilbert and Sullivan’s The Gondoliers, which Lady
Moran, who had a fine voice, would sing to him. He was emotional,
and wept easily. But his tears soon dried, as joy came flooding
back. He drew his strength from people, and imparted it to them in
full measure. Everyone who values freedom under law, and government
by, for, and from the people, can find comfort and reassurance in
his life story.