The way structures in the developing brain are
related to changes in psychological and cognitive development is of
interest to child neuropsychologists. There are several ways that
this relationship can be explored, including: (1) correlating
structural changes in the developing brain with behavioral changes,
(2) investigating behavioral changes and making inferences about
structural maturation of the brain, and (3) studying brain
dysfunction and its relationship to behavioral disorders (Kolb
& Fantie, 1989).
Although these approaches can yield useful
information about the developing brain, they are not without
shortcomings. For example, because of the plasticity of the
developing brain following damage, injury in a specific brain
region may produce behavioral losses that vary greatly depending on
the age of the child. Environmental factors, such as enrichment
opportunities and social-cultural experiences, also influence the
developing brain and the manner in which behaviors are expressed
(Baron, 2004). Thus, the study of
the brain-behavior relationship is particularly complex in
children, and these factors must enter the equation when drawing
conclusions about this relationship. Some have criticized
neuropsychological approaches because of the level of inferences
made when relating behavior to brain structure and function, and
because of the correlational nature of the research (Fletcher &
Taylor, 1984). There are now
medical technologies and new research protocols that avoid some of
these shortcomings. These technologies make it possible to explore
the brain during craniotomies under local anesthesia (McDermott,
Watson, & Ojemann, 2005), to
investigate dendritic morphology with electron microscopic
techniques (Scheibel, 1990), to measure sequential brain processing
during cognitive tasks using visual evoked potentials (Liotti et
al., 2007), and to image the brain while a person is completing a
task through functional magnetic resonance imaging (Pliszka et al.
2006).
Our basic understanding of the brain and its
relationship to complex human behaviors has been greatly
facilitated by technological advances in modern neuroimaging
techniques, including computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance
imaging (MRI), regional blood flow (rCBF), and positron-emission
tomography (PET). Neuroimaging techniques allow researchers to
gather direct evidence linking cognitive, behavioral, and
psychosocial disorders to anatomical, physiological, and
biochemical processes in the brain (Semrud-Clikeman, 2007). Research findings about the developing
brain from these various approaches and methodologies will be used
throughout this chapter in an effort to explore the biological
basis of childhood disorders. These techniques will be further
discussed in Chapter
3. To fully appreciate the brain-behavior
relationship in children, an overview of the structure and function
of the brain is necessary. This chapter reviews the structures and
functions of the neuron and the sub-cortical and cortical regions
from a neurodevelopmental perspective. This review serves as a
foundation for exploring the complex interaction between anatomical
development of the brain and the emergence of childhood behaviors
and disorders.
Structure and Function of the Neuron
The neuron, the basic cellular structure of the
nervous system, transmits nerve impulses throughout a complex
network of interconnecting brain cells. The brain contains
approximately 180 billion cells, 50 billion of which transmit and
receive sensory-motor signals in the central nervous system (CNS)
via 15,000 direct physical connections (Carlson, 2007). Investigation of the structure and
function of neurons and their synaptic connections provides insight
into basic psychopharmacology at the molecular level and may
provide a method for describing how various neuropsychiatric
disorders emerge and progress (Pliszka, 2003).
The CNS is comprised of two major cell types,
neurons and neuroglia (Carlson, 2007). While neurons conduct nerve impulses, the
neuroglia (“nerve glue”) provide structural support and insulate
synapses (the connections between neurons). Glial cells make up
about 50 percent of the total volume of the CNS. Glial cells serve
various functions, including transmission of signals across
neurons, structural support for neurons, repair of injured neurons,
and production of CNS fluid (Carlson, 2007). Neuroglia infiltrate or invade surrounding
tissue in both the gray and white matter, and in rare instances
these cells replicate uncontrollably during tumor activity (Nortz,
Hemme-Phillips, & Ris, 2007).
Though still relatively infrequent, pediatric brain tumors are the
second most common neoplasm in children under 15 years of age, and
as many as 1,000–1,500 cases are estimated to occur each year
(Sklar, 2002).
Gray matter is located in the core of the CNS,
the corpus striata at the base of the right and left hemispheres,
the cortex that covers each hemisphere, and the cerebellum
(Carlson, 2007). The cell bodies,
the neuroglia, and the blood vessels that enervate the CNS are
gray-brown in color and constitute the gray matter. White matter
covers the gray matter and long axons extending out from the
neuron. Axons are generally covered by a myelin sheath, which
contains considerable amounts of neuroglia and appears white upon
inspection. White matter has fewer capillaries than gray matter
(Carlson, 2007).
As the basic functional unit of the CNS, the
neuron transmits impulses in aggregated communities or nuclei that
have special behavioral functions. Neurons can be modified through
experience, and they are said to learn, to remember, and to forget
as a result of experiences (Hinton, 1993). Pathological changes in neurons can occur
as a result of early abnormal experiences. Although these
alterations are thought to have a profound effect on the mature
organism, the exact nature of these changes is still under
investigation. Genetic aberrations also play a role in the way
neurons develop and function (Cody et al. 2005). Damage to or destruction of neurons is
also of concern because neurons typically do not regenerate
(Swaiman, Ashwal, & Ferriero, 2006). Neurodevelopmental disorders and issues
related to recovery of function following brain trauma will be
discussed in detail in later chapters (see Chapter 10).
Anatomy of the Neuron
The neuron contains four well-defined cellular
parts, including the cell body, dendrites, axons, and axon
terminals. The cell body, or soma, is the trophic or life center of
the neuron (see Fig. 2.1). Cell bodies vary in size and shape and
contain the ribonucleic acid (RNA) and deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA)
of the neuron. RNA, the site of protein synthesis, transmits
instructions from DNA directing the metabolic functions of the
neuron. Biochemical processes of the neuron, which take place in
the cytoplasm of the cell body, include the energy-producing
functions, the self-reproducing functions, and the oxidating
reactions, whereby energy is made available for the metabolic
activities of the cell (Carlson, 2007). Destruction or damage to the cell body can
result in the death of the neuron.

Fig.
2.1
Anatomy of the NeuronSource: From Neil R. Carlson,
Physiology of Behavior, 5th
edition, p. 21. Copyright © 1994 by Allyn and Bacon. Reprinted by
permission
Dendrites branch off the cell body and receive
impulses from other neurons (Carlson, 2007). Dendrites are afferent in nature and
conduct nerve impulses toward the cell body. Dendritic spines are
the major point of the synapse, the area of transmission from one
cell to another. Individuals with cognitive retardation have fewer
spines or points of contact across neurons (Klein-Tasman, Phillips,
& Kelderman, 2007). Dendrites
can transmit neuronal impulses across neurons through either
temporal or graded potentials. In this case, as a neuron receives
an impulse it can transmit this impulse if the stimulation is close
in time to another impulse or if it is strong enough combined with
a previous impulse.
The axon is a long projection or axis from the
cell body. Most neurons have only one axon, usually efferent in
nature, that conducts nerve impulses away from the cell body. Axons
are typically longer than dendrites and can be as much as one yard
in length. For example, giant pyramidal cells in the motor cortex
send axons to the caudal tip of the spinal cord. The axon hillock
is a slender process close to the cell body where action potentials
arise. The axon hillock is highly excitable and is activated
through electrochemical processes, thereby “turning on” the neuron
(Carlson, 2007). The impulse must
be of sufficient strength for the neuron to “fire.” Axons follow an
“all or nothing” rule; if the impulse is not strong enough the
neuron will not fire and, thus, will not transmit the message to
another neuron. After the neuron fires, there is a period of time
when it will not fire again as the neuron “recovers.”
Axons are covered by a myelin sheath made up of
neurilemma (or Schwann cells), which surround the axon. The myelin
sheath gives the axon a white appearance and constitutes most of
the white matter in cortical and subcortical areas. Most axons are
myelinated at birth particularly in areas necessary for survival
(motor-sucking; tactile sensitivity to hot, cold, and pain;
auditory, and vision). Some axons continue to myelinate throughout
development with myelinization not complete in the frontal lobes
until well into the third decade of life. Changes in postnatal
brain weight are generally related to increases in dendritic
connections and to increases in the number of glial cells that form
the myelin sheath along the axon (Shepherd, 2004).
Axons allow the nerve cells to transmit impulses
rapidly, particularly along the Nodes of Ranvier. The Nodes of
Ranvier are gaps in the myelin and during cell activation, nerve
impulses skip from node to node. Myelinated axons permit more rapid
transmission of signals, and anesthetics seem to be more effective
at the Nodes of Ranvier. The terminal branches of the axon end at
the synaptic telodendria.
The presynaptic and postsynaptic sites are both
referred to as the synapse. Synapses are specialized for the
release of chemicals known as neurotransmitters. Neurotransmitters
are released from synaptic knobs at the end foot of the neuron in
the presynapse, and they activate neurons at the postsynapse.
Neurotransmitters are released from the presynapse (neuron A),
travel across the synaptic cleft, and influence the activity of the
adjoining neuron (neuron B) (see Fig. 2.2 for a depiction of
these activities). There is a collection of vesicles at the
synaptic knob at the end of each synapse, where neurotransmitters
are stored. Most neurons have thousands of synapses, and each
dendritic spine serves as a synapse that is excitatory in nature,
which causes neurons to fire. Synapses are quite large for motor
neurons and are smaller in the cerebellum and other cortical
regions. Synapses usually occur between the axon of one cell and
the dendrite of another (axondendritic connections). Although they
can connect onto the soma or cell body of another neuron
(axosomatic connection), synapses rarely occur from axon to axon
(axo-axonal connections).

Fig.
2.2
Anatomy Showing Connections between Neuron
A and B with Synaptic Cleft
Source: From Neil R. Carlson,
Physiology of Behavior, 5th
edition, p. 23. Copyright © 1994 by Allyn and Bacon. Reprinted with
permission
Types of Neurons
There are two basic types of neurons: efferent
and afferent. Efferent neurons originate in the motor cortex of the
CNS, descend through vertical pathways into subcortical regions,
and culminate in the body’s muscles (Gazzaniga, Ivry, & Mangun,
2002). These large descending
tracts form columns from the motor cortex connecting higher
cortical regions through the brain stem and spinal cord, to the
body for the activation of single muscles or muscle groups. Various
motor pathways begin to develop prenatally, while postnatal
development is marked by changes in primitive reflexes (the
Babinski reflex) and automatic reflexes (head and neck righting)
(Swaiman et al., 2006).
Afferent neurons, sensory receptors found
throughout the body, transmit sensory information into specific
cerebral areas. For example, afferent neurons consist of rods and
cones (cells that convey information about color or black/white) in
the visual system that project into the occipital cortex; hair
cells (convey information about tone) in the auditory system that
project into the temporal cortex, and pain, touch, temperature, and
pressure sensors in the skin that project into the parietal cortex.
Somesthetic senses are the first to become functional in the fetus,
as early as 7–8 weeks gestation, while auditory and visual neural
maturation occurs later in embryonic development (Gazzaniga et al.,
2002). Other cells in the corpus
callosum (a large bundle of fibers connecting the two hemispheres)
and the frontal lobes do not become fully functional until the
teenage years through the 20s.
Types of Neuroglia
The neuroglia cells serve a number of important
functions in the CNS: (1) providing structural support to neurons;
(2) aiding in the regeneration of injured nerve fibers; (3)
occupying injured sites by producing scar tissue, and (4)
transporting gas, water, and metabolites from blood, and removing
wastes from nerve cells (Carlson, 2007). The three major types of neuroglia
(astrocytes, oligodendroglia, and microglia) have distinct
functions and serve multiple purposes in the CNS. Astrocytes have
three primary functions: (1) forming the blood-brain barrier; (2)
supporting the cellular structure of the brain, and (3) directing
the migration of neurons during early development. Astrocytes are
the largest in size and the most abundant type of neuroglia
(Carlson, 2007). These star-shaped
glial cells attach to capillary blood vessels and cover
approximately 80 percent of each capillary. Astrocytes, found
primarily in the pia matter (fine membrane on the surface of the
brain), cover large blood vessels. When injury occurs to the spinal
cord or to the brain, through either disease or trauma, astrocytes
go into hypertrophy (Morris, Krawiecki, Kullgren, Ingram, &
Kurczynski, 2000). These cells
multiply quickly, forming a glial scar that fills in gaps in the
cellular structure caused by injury. Astrocytes may also serve a
phagocytic function by removing destroyed tissue and cleaning up
the site of injury. Astrocytoma, a type of primary neoplasm that
frequently reoccurs after surgery, is the second most common brain
tumor in adults (Hunter et al., 2005); though rare, astrocytomas do occur in
children as well.
Astrocytomas in childhood most frequently occur
in the cerebellum and the brain stem. These tumors are found
equally in males and females. Although astrocytomas can occur at
any age, the most frequent incidence is between five and nine years
of age (Hunter et al., 2005).
Oligodendroglia cells form and maintain the myelin sheath and, when
injured, swell in size. Tumors rarely occur in oligodendroglia
cells; when they do they grow slowly and are found primarily in the
cortex and white matter. While about 40–60 percent of these tumors
can be detected by skull X-rays after they calcify (Cohen &
Duggner, 1994), radionuclide brain
scans, angiography, and computed tomography scans have been helpful
in the diagnostic phase of tumor processes. Finally, microglia
cells are predominantly found in the gray matter (Carlson,
2007). Following disease or injury,
microglia proliferate, move to the site of injury, and perform a
phagocytic function by cleaning up damaged tissue. Tumors rarely
occur in microglia cells.
These cells develop at different rates depending
on location in the brain, experience of the baby, and genetic
programming. In order to understand difficulties children have in
development it is first important to understand how a typical brain
develops. The following section provides a brief overview of the
course of neuronal development.
Spinal Cord
The spinal cord serves two major functions:
connecting the brain and the body via large sensory and motor
neurons. The spinal cord comprises gray matter and white matter.
Gray matter is the central, interior region of the spinal cord and
is shaped like a butterfly. It appears gray on inspection and is
made up of cell bodies. Neurons leave the spinal cord in segments
called dermatomes and enter into muscles and organs. Motor commands
from higher cortical centers are conducted at these sites. Sensory
receptors connect with motor neurons in the gray matter of the
spinal cord, via interneurons. Interneurons remain in the spinal
cord and mediate motor activity with sensory stimuli. Interneurons
also provide for cooperation among different spinal segments, which
control distant muscle groups. For example, interneurons connect
cervical and lumbar regions of the spinal cord to coordinate
forelimbs and legs for walking. White matter surrounds the gray
matter and consists of the myelin sheath (Brodal, 2004).
The spinal cord conducts signals to and from
higher cortical regions, including the brain stem, the cerebellum,
and the cortex. The posterior root of the spinal cord is afferent
in nature, where sensory fibers enter into the gray matter, synapse
with other neurons, and ascend into higher cortical areas in
pathways. Conversely, the anterior root is efferent in nature and
is made up of motor fibers that receive motor signals from higher
cortical areas and communicate to muscle groups for movement. Nerve
fibers enter and leave the spinal cord at regular intervals
(dermatomes) and provide sensory and motor innervation to specific
body segments. There are a total of 30 segments innervating the
spinal cord: eight cervical, 12 thoracic, five lumbar, and five
sacral (Brodal, 2004). Damage to
the spinal cord at specific sites produces localized sensory and
motor dysfunction in the body.
Unlike the brain, the spinal cord has little
diversification or specialization, but it does carry out sensory,
motor, and integrative functions. Four such functions are carried
out in the spinal cord: (1) reflex activity, whereby a stimulus is
followed by a coordinated motor response; (2) reciprocal activity,
whereby one activity starts or stops another (i.e., excitatory or
inhibitory); (3) monitoring activity, whereby incoming messages are
controlled, coded, and transmitted, and (4) transmission activity,
whereby messages are transmitted to and from the brain through the
white matter (Kolb & Whishaw, 2003). In summary, the spinal cord is one of two
major divisions of the CNS; the second is the brain.
Structure and Function of the Brain
The nervous system is divided into two basic
systems: the peripheral (PNS) and the central nervous system (CNS).
The PNS consists of the spinal, cranial, and peripheral nerves that
connect the CNS to the rest of the body. Table 2.1 lists the cranial
nerves and their functions. The CNS is completely encased in bone,
is surrounded by protective coverings (meninges), and consists of
two major structures: (1) the spinal cord in the vertebral column,
and (2) the brain within the skull.
Table
2.1
Cranial nerves
Number
|
Name
|
Function
|
---|---|---|
I
|
Olfactory
|
Smell
|
II
|
Optic
|
Vision
|
III
|
Oculomotor
|
Eye movement
|
IV
|
Trochlear
|
Eye movement
|
V
|
Trigeminal
|
Masticatory movement
|
VI
|
Abducens
|
Eye movement
|
VII
|
Facial
|
Face movement
|
VIII
|
Auditory
|
Hearing
|
IX
|
Glossopharyngeal
|
Tongue and pharynx movement
|
X
|
Vagus
|
Heart, blood vessels, viscera, larynx, and
pharynx movement
|
XI
|
Spinal Accessory
|
Strength of neck and shoulder muscles
|
XII
|
Hypoglossal
|
Tongue muscles
|
Role and Function of the Meninges
Both the spinal cord and the brain are surrounded
by a protective layer of tissue called the meninges. The meninges
comprise three layers: the dura mater, the arachnoid, and the pia
mater. The dura mater is the tough outer layer of the spinal cord
and the brain, and has the consistency of a thin rubber glove. The
dura mater attaches to the bones covering the cranium and receives
blood vessels that innervate the brain (Brodal, 2004). Head injury may form an epidural hematoma,
causing blood to accumulate in the region between the skull and the
dura mater. The dura mater is supplied with blood by tiny vessels
on its outermost layer near the skull. The subdural space, a
fluid-filled layer, separates the dura mater from the arachnoid
space. Accumulation of blood in the subdural area following injury
can put enormous pressure on the brain (Swaiman et al.,
2006). The arachnoid, a spiderlike
web, is a delicate network of tissue under the dura mater. Blood
accumulation between the dura mater and the arachnoid following
injury is referred to as a subdural hematoma. Finally, the pia
mater is the fragile, innermost layer of the meninges and contains
small blood vessels. The pia mater surrounds the arteries and veins
that supply blood to the brain; it serves as a barrier keeping out
harmful substances that might invade the brain.
Bilateral infections that attack the meninges,
referred to as meningitis, can have serious consequences for the
developing brain (Swaiman et al., 2006). The first year of life is the time of
greatest risk for meningitis. The earlier the infection occurs, the
higher the mortality rate. Some of the long-term consequences of
meningitis are mental retardation, hydrocephalus, seizures,
deafness, and hyperactivity (Swaiman et al., 2006). Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), a clear,
colorless fluid, fills the ventricles and the subarachnoid space
(Wilkinson, 1986). CSF contains
concentrations of sodium, chloride, and magnesium, as well as
levels of neurotransmitters and other agents. An assay of the
composition of these chemicals can be important for diagnosing
disease processes. CSF reproduces at such a rate that total
replacement occurs several times a day. The choroid plexus, located
in the floor of the ventricles, produces the CSF, while the lateral
ventricles contain the highest amounts of CSF. Infectious and
metabolic disorders, such as meningitis, encephalitis, and tumors,
as well as traumatic injury, can cause discernible changes in the
CSF.
Cerebrospinal fluid has three major functions.
Specifically, it (1) protects against injury to the brain and
spinal cord; (2) diffuses materials into and away from the brain,
and (3) maintains a “special environment” for brain tissues.
Interference in the circulation and drainage of CSF can result in
hydrocephalus, which causes cranial pressure. Hydrocephalus can
have a devastating affect on the developing brain and may cause
cognitive delays, particularly for nonverbal information;
emotional, psychiatric, or behavioral disturbances, and slow motor
development (Fletcher, Dennis, & Northrup, 2000). Surgical shunting drains CSF outside the
skull. Recent advances in microsurgery in utero have produced
successful results by reducing some of the more severe long-term
negative effects of brain dysfunction or damage that can occur when
hydrocephalus is untreated. Residual effects of hydrocephaly,
ranging from mild to severe, depend on individual variables
including the age of the child at the time of shunting and the
presence of other neurological or medical complications that often
accompany this disorder (Fletcher et al., 2000).
Ventricles
The ventricles, large cavities filled with
cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), reside in various regions of the brain.
The fourth ventricle, also referred to as the aqueduct of Sylvius,
resides in the brain stem at the level of the pons and the medulla.
The third ventricle is located in the diencephalon, and the lateral
ventricles are found in the forebrain region (see Fig. 2.3). Ventricles provide
equilibrium as well as the CSF transporting nutrients and wastes
throughout the brain. When these ventricles appear enlarged, a
diagnosis of a tumor or disease processes, including hydrocephalus,
encephalitis, and meningitis, may be made.

Fig.
2.3
Sagittal Section of the Brain Showing Brain
Stem, Midbrain, and Forebrain Structure
Source: Adapted from M. Semrud-Clikeman
and P. A. Teeter, “Personality, Intelligence, and Neuropsychology,”
in D. Saklofske (Ed.), International Handbook of Personality and
Intelligence in Clinical Psychology and Neuropsychology,
copyright © 1995 by Plenum Press, New York
Structure and Function of the Brain Stem
The brain stem comprises five areas, including
the fourth ventricle, the medulla oblongata, the pons (bridge), the
midbrain (mesencephalon), and the diencephalon. Figure 2.4 shows a schematic of
these structures and Fig. 2.5 shows a magnetic resonance image of these
same structures. The major regions of the brain stem are discussed
in detail in the following sections.

Fig.
2.4
MRI Sagittal Section of CNS Analogous to
Brain Areas Depicted in Figure 2.3

Fig.
2.5
Coronal Section Showing Structures of the
Right and Left Hemisphere with Ventricular Systems
Medulla Oblongata
The medulla is a continuation of the spinal cord
and contains nerve tracts similar to those found in the spinal
cord. Groups of sensory and motor nuclei are arranged in ascending
(i.e., afferent-sensory tracts) or descending (i.e., efferent-motor
tracts) cell columns. Projections of the major cranial nerves occur
at the level of the medulla, including the hypoglossal (tongue),
the glossopharyngeal (pharynx and larynx), and the accessory (neck
muscles) nerves. The sensory and motor tracts cross over into the
opposite side of the brain at the level of the medulla. The
somatosensory (touch, pressure, pain, and temperature) and the
motor systems are organized in contralateral fashion, such that
sensory information and movement on the right side of the body are
primarily controlled by the left hemisphere. Conversely, the left
side of the body is controlled by the right hemisphere. The
auditory and visual systems also cross in the medulla. These
functional systems will be discussed in more detail later in this
chapter.
The reticular activating system (RAS) comprises a
major portion of the medulla, extends into the midbrain region, and
has numerous connections and functions (Brodal, 2004). The RAS, considered the arousal system,
plays an important role in maintaining consciousness and
attentional states for the entire brain. The RAS has been
hypothesized as one of the critical mechanisms involved in ADHD
(Sagvolden & Archer, 1989).
For example, some RAS functions control blood pressure, blood
volume in organs, and heart rate, whereas others regulate sleep and
wakefulness.
The RAS receives input from most sensory systems
and connects to all levels of the CNS. Because the RAS is directly
or indirectly connected to much of the CNS, it can modulate CNS
activity. Selective stimuli activate the RAS, which then alerts the
cortex to incoming stimuli. Researchers espousing a bottom-up model
hypothesize that the RAS may be filtering too much sensory
information, thereby not allowing stimulation to reach the higher
cortical regions that are necessary for adequate direction and
maintenance of attention. When enough information reaches the RAS,
it signals the cortex and produces cortical arousal and
wakefulness. Thus, in children with ADHD this subcortical filter
may not allow sufficient stimuli to reach higher cortical regions.
This theory and others will be explored in later chapters.
Secretion of serotonin takes place at the pons,
probably in the raphe system. The raphe nuclei are cells located
across the medulla, pons, and midbrain regions, with afferent
connections to the hypothalamus and limbic system (Brodal,
2004). This region also contains
the locus ceruleus (LC), which produces 70 percent of
norepinephrine in the brain, and serves as a modulator for other
neurotransmitters (Carlson, 2007).
The norepinephrine-rich cells in the locus ceruleus connect with
the serotonin-rich cells in the raphe nuclei, and each type has a
reciprocal affect on the other. Norepinephrine plays a role in
vigilance, arousal, filtration of stimuli, and habituation.
Finally, the continuation of the RAS at the pontine level appears
to mediate sleep.
Serotonin inhibits arousal of the RAS, which then
allows the thalamus to bring the cortex to a slow-wave sleep state
(Carlson, 2007). Anesthetics appear
to depress the RAS, which ultimately depresses the cortex. Fibers
in the RAS also project to the limbic system and serve behavioral
and emotional mechanisms for the control of pain. Morphine and
opiate-like drugs may produce analgesic actions most likely in the
raphe system (Shepherd, 2004).
Pons
The pons, between the medulla and midbrain and
above the cerebellum, serves as a bridge across the right and the
left hemispheres. Major sensory and motor pathways move through the
pons, a continuation from the spinal cord and brainstem regions,
and enter into higher cortical areas. The pons, in coordination
with the cerebellum, receives information concerning movements from
the motor cortex and helps modulate movements (Brodal,
2004). Information from the visual
cortex is also received at the pontine level, which serves to guide
visually determined movements. Finally, information from the
hypothalamus and the limbic system converge in the pons and may
influence the impact of emotional and motivational factors on motor
activity (Brodal, 2004). A number
of cranial nerves converge in the pontine region. Cranial nerves
innervating the face and head receive sensory information and
transmit signals in the pons for swallowing and chewing (trigeminal
nerve), moving facial muscles, and affecting the hearing and
equilibrium in the inner ear. Cranial nerves innervating the eye
muscles (abducens) also pass through the pons.
Midbrain
The most anterior region of the brainstem is the
midbrain or mesencephalon. The midbrain serves a major relay
function for sensory-motor fibers. The two major divisions in the
midbrain are the tegmentum, which falls below the ventricle and is
separated by the substantia nigra, and the tectum, which comprises
the superior colliculi (upper region involved in vision) and the
inferior colliculi (lower region involved in the integration of
auditory and kinesthetic impulses). The RAS also continues into the
midbrain region. Several cranial nerves are located in the midbrain
region. The oculomotor nerve moves the eye (lateral and downward
gaze), and regulates the size of the pupil and the shape of the
lens. The trigeminal nerve also resides in the midbrain area and
serves as the major sensory nerve of the face.
Diencephalon
The diencephalon, the superior region of the
brain stem, contains major relay and integrative centers for all
the sensory systems except smell. The diencephalon is not clearly
demarcated, but includes the thalamus, the hypothalamus, the
pituitary gland, the internal capsule, the third ventricle, and the
optic nerve (Brodal, 2004). The
thalamus receives input from several sensory sources, including:
(1) the visual system (projecting into the lateral geniculate body
of the thalamus); (2) the auditory system (projecting into the
medial geniculate body), and (3) sensory receptors in the skin for
pain, pressure, touch, and temperature.
The hypothalamus, anterior and inferior to the
thalamus, plays a role in controlling the autonomic nervous system,
including eating, sexual functions and dysfunctions, drinking,
sleeping, temperature, rage, and violence. With connections to the
limbic system, the hypothalamus influences motivational mechanisms
of behavior. The pituitary, following directions from the
hypothalamus, secretes hormones that regulate bodily functions. The
internal capsule, situated lateral to the thalamus, contains fibers
connecting the cortex to lower brain regions including the
brainstem and the spinal cord. Major fibers comprise the internal
capsule and connect the frontal cortical regions to the thalamus
and to the pons. Finally, the optic nerve converges in the
diencephalon and forms the optic chiasma (Brodal, 2004). Fibers from the optic nerve cross at the
chiasma and project to the lateral geniculate body in the thalamus
via the optic tract (Brodal, 2004).
Figure 2.6
shows these structures.
Cerebellum
The cerebellum or hindbrain, behind the brain
stem, connects to the midbrain, pons, and medulla. The cerebellum
receives sensory information about where the limbs are in space and
signals where muscles should be positioned. The cerebellum receives
information from the semicircular canals (in the inner ear)
concerning orientation in space. The cerebellum is involved in the
unconscious adjustment of muscles in the body for coordinated,
smooth, and complex motor activity. Injury of the cerebellum can
result in dystaxia (movement disorders), dysarthria (slurred
speech), nystagmus (blurred vision and dizziness), and hypotonia
(loss of muscle tone) (Swaiman et al., 2006). Though still relatively uncommon,
subtentorial tumors involving the cerebellum and the fourth
ventricle are the most frequent type of brain tumor affecting young
children (Konczak, Schoch, Dimitrova, Gizewski, & Timmann,
2005).
Structure and Function of the Forebrain
Neocortex
The neocortex, often referred to simply as the
cortex, comprises the highest functional division of the forebrain
and makes up about 80 percent of the human brain. The cortex is
wrinkled in appearance, with various elevated ridges and
convolutions. Ridges are referred to as gyri, the deepest indentations are
called fissures, and the
shallower indentations are called sulci. The configuration of fissures
and large sulci can be identified on visual inspection of the
cortex (see Fig. 2.6). The lateral or Sylvian fissure separates
the frontal lobe from the temporal lobe, and the central sulcus
(fissure of Rolando) separates the frontal from the parietal lobe.
The central sulcus is a prominent landmark separating the motor
cortex (anterior to the central sulcus) from the sensory cortex
(posterior to the central sulcus). The surface areas of posterior
temporal and parietal locations are not clearly defined from the
occipital regions. Finally, the calcarine sulcus extends from the
occipital pole below to the splenium of the corpus callosum. The
following sections will describe the structures and functions of
the cortex. This brief overview of the structure, function, and
development of neurons serves as a foundation for understanding the
basic structure of the CNS and will be explored in more detail in a
discussion of brain tumors and head trauma (Chapter 10) and in the discussion of
psychopharmacology (Chapter 11). In the following
sections, the basic divisions of the nervous system will be
explored.

Fig.
2.6
Surface of the Left Hemisphere Showing
Sulci, Fissures, and Major Subdivisions of the Cortex
Source: Adapted from M. Semrud-Clikeman
and P. A. Teeter, “Personality, Intelligence and Neuropsychology,”
in D. Saklofske (Ed.), International handbook of Personality and
Intelligence in Clinical Psychology and Neuropsychology,
copyright © 1995 by Plenum Press, New York
Cerebral Hemispheres
The cerebrum comprises the right and left
hemispheres, which appear to have anatomical (asymmetry) as well as
functional (lateralization) differences (Brodal, 2004). Asymmetry typically refers to the
structural or morphological differences between the two hemispheres
(Rosen, Galaburda, & Sherman, 1990). Although neuroanatomical
differences may underlie behavioral variations documented for each
hemisphere, it is not known whether chemical as well as structural
differences between the hemispheres also account for functional
asymmetries (Witelson & Kigar, 1988). Cerebral lateralization
refers to the degree to which each hemisphere is specialized for
processing specific tasks. The right and left hemispheres appear to
differ in terms of their efficiency in processing certain stimuli,
such that both hemispheres are “not equally good at all tasks”
(Brodal, 2004). Goldberg and Costa
(1981) indicate that significant
cytoarchitectural differences exist between the two hemispheres
that may be related to neurobehavioral differences. The left
hemisphere has a greater ratio of gray matter to white matter,
particularly in the frontal, parietal, and temporal regions,
compared to the right hemisphere. Conversely, the right hemisphere
has greater white-to-gray matter ratios than the left
hemisphere.
Major anatomical and functional differences
observed in the two hemispheres are described as follows:
- 1.
The left hemisphere has more neuronal representations in modality-specific regions in the three sensory cortices.
- 2.
The right hemisphere has greater association zones, where sensory modalities converge.
- 3.
The left hemisphere is structurally conducive to single modality processing, distinct motor activity, and intraregional integration.
- 4.
The right hemisphere is structurally conducive to multiple modality and intraregional integration.
- 5.
The right hemisphere has a greater capacity for handling informational complexity because of its intraregional connections, whereas the left hemisphere seems best suited for processing unimodal stimuli.
The right hemisphere appears better able to
process novel information, whereas the left hemisphere seems able
to work more efficiently with information with preexisting codes,
such as those found in language activities. These differences will
be further explored in a later discussion regarding nonverbal
learning disabilities. Although the correlations between structure
and function are not perfect, cerebral asymmetry has been of great
interest to child neuropsychologists (Baron, 2004). Further, particular anatomical asymmetries
between the two hemispheres are present at birth (Kolb &
Whishaw, 2003). Measurable
differences have been observed in the left planum temporale (near
the auditory cortex) by 39 weeks gestation, leading some to suggest
that the functional lateralization of language in the left
hemisphere is determined prenatally (Witelson & Kigar,
1988). In adults, approximately 70
percent of right-handed individuals show larger planum temporale in
the left hemisphere. The planum temporale has been related to
phonological coding, a process very important in reading
(Semrud-Clikeman, Hynd, Novey, & Eliopulos, 1991). The typical asymmetry of the left
hemisphere has not been observed in those with developmental
dyslexia and, thus, may be related to the difficulty in encoding
letters and words (Galaburda, Sherman, Rosen, Aboitiz, &
Geschwind, 1985; Hynd,
Semrud-Clikeman, Lorys, Novey, & Eliopulos, 1990; Larsen, Hoeien, & Oedegaard,
1992).
Early accounts of cerebral lateralization often
listed specific functions for each hemisphere in a dichotomous,
all-or-nothing fashion, implying that all aspects of a given task
were carried out by one hemisphere. This all-or-nothing approach is
probably overly simplistic because both hemispheres generally play
a role in most complex tasks. One hemisphere, however, is usually
considered dominant or most important for a specific task, while
the other hemisphere is recessive or nondominant. Table
2.2 summarizes
the developmental milestones for anatomical and functional
asymmetries.
Table
2.2
Major Division of the Nervous System
Brain Divisions
|
Brain Structures
|
Functional Divisions
|
---|---|---|
Telencephalon (endbrain)
|
Neocortex
Basal ganglia
Limbic system
Olfactory bulb
Lateral ventricles
|
Forebrain
|
Diencephalon (between-brain)
|
Thalamus
Epithalamus
Hypothalamns
Pineal gland
Third ventricle
|
|
Mesencephalon (midbrain)
|
Tectum
Tegmentum
Cerebral aqueduct
|
Brain stem
|
Metencephalon (across-brain)
|
Cerebellum
Pons
Fourth ventricle
|
|
Myelencephalon (spinal brain)
|
Medulla oblongata
Fourth Ventricle
|
Spinal cord
|
Witelson (1990)
suggests that it is unclear whether functional differences between
the two hemispheres are “relative” or “absolute,” in such a way
that each hemisphere is able to process tasks, but does so less
efficiently. Others have proposed that the two hemispheres operate
in a domain-specific fashion, whereby each hemisphere acts in an
autonomous manner with restricted access to information processed
by the other hemisphere.
Zaidal, Clark, and Suyenobu (1990) suggest the following:
- (1)
the two hemispheres can operate independently of one another, which reinforces the concept of hemispheric specialization, in some domain-specific functions;
- (2)
hemispheric specialization is “hard-wired” and is apparently innately directed;
- (3)
developmental patterns of the two hemispheres may differ, and
- (4)
while the two hemispheres may share processing resources, they can remain autonomous at any stage of processing.
Functional neuroimaging techniques will help
answer these questions and will no doubt add to our understanding
of the relative contribution of the two hemispheres, as well as
specific structures, during certain activities. Some findings have
implicated parts of the right hemisphere (particularly the
posterior portion) to be important for visual-spatial and mental
rotation tasks (Perez-Fabello, Campos, & Gomez-Juncal,
2007). Others have found more
activation in the left hemisphere for processing of language and
verbal comprehension (Booth et al., 1999). In addition, studies are beginning to show
a right hemispheric preference for processing of emotional
information. Facial expression processing has been found to be
bilateral and to involve the fusiform gyrus of the temporal lobe
(Pierce, Muller, Ambrose, Allen, & Courchesne, 2001). While anatomical differences appear early
in development, there is insufficient evidence to conclude that
morphological variations between the two hemispheres predict
functional capabilities in any perfect sense (Kinsbourne,
2003).
Damage to the left hemisphere can result in a
shift of language functions to the right hemisphere, particularly
if both the posterior and anterior speech zones are damaged (Kolb
& Whishaw, 2003). While
language functions can be assumed by the right hemisphere, complex
visuospatial functions appear to be in jeopardy (Kolb &
Whishaw, 2003); further, complex
syntactic processing appears vulnerable. So, although the left
hemisphere might be better organized anatomically to deal with the
language process, as suggested by the Goldberg and Costa
(1981) model, the right hemisphere
is able to do so under specific conditions. However, there is a
price to be paid when one hemisphere assumes the function of the
other, usually involving the loss or compromise of higher level
functions. These more complex functions also may be more dependent
on the anatomical differences generally found between the two
hemispheres that exist early in the developing brain. This
difference is most likely a result of the differential ratio of
gray-to-white matter between the two hemispheres described by
Goldberg and Costa (1981).
Recovery and loss of functions will be covered in more detail in
subsequent chapters.
Interhemispheric Connections
Large bundles of myelinated fibers connect
various intra- and interhemispheric regions. The two hemispheres
are connected via several transverse commissures or pathways,
including the corpus callosum, the anterior commissure, and the
posterior commissure. The corpus callosum, comprising the rostrum,
the genu, the body, and the splenium, contains approximately 300
million nerve fibers for rapid interhemispheric communication
(Carlson, 2007). The genu connects
rostral portions of the right and left frontal lobes, while the
body has interconnections between the frontal and parietal regions
across the two hemispheres. The splenium connects temporal and
occipital regions and is reportedly larger in females
(Semrud-Clikeman, Fine, & Bledsoe, 2008). The splenium has been implicated in
various childhood disorders, including ADHD (Hynd, Semrud-Clikeman,
Lorys, Novey, & Eliopulos, 1991; Semrud-Clikeman et al., 1994) and dyslexia (Fine, Semrud-Clikeman,
Keith, Stapleton, & Hynd, 2006). The anterior commissure is smaller than
the corpus callosum and connects the temporal lobes of the right
and left hemispheres (Kolb & Whishaw, 2003).
lntrahemispheric Connections
Association fibers connect cortical regions
within each hemisphere (Kandel, Schwartz, & Jessell,
2000b). Association pathways allow
for rapid communication within hemispheric regions for the
perception and integration of stimuli and to organize complex
output (e.g., emotional responses to stimuli). Short association
fibers connect one to another, and longer fibers connect one lobe
to another. For example, the arcuate fasciculus connects the
frontal and temporal lobes; the longitudinal fasciculus connects
the temporal and the occipital lobes with the frontal lobe; the
occipitofrontal fasciculus connects the frontal, temporal, and
occipital lobes, and the angular gyms connects the parietal and the
occipital lobes (Kandel, Schwartz, & Jessell, 2000a). Dysfunction of these pathways can result
in a variety of behavioral, cognitive, and personality
manifestations including reading, spelling, and computational
disorders in children (Zaidel, Iacoboni, Zaidel, & Bogen,
2003).
Structure and Function of the Cortex
The forebrain (telencephalon) comprises the four
lobes, the lateral ventricles, the olfactory bulb, the limbic
system, the basal ganglia, and the neocortex. Some textbooks also
place the thalamus in the forebrain region, while others refer to
this as a diencephalic structure (Brodal, 2004). The cortex
comprises the right and left hemispheres, each with four major
lobes: (1) frontal, motor cortex; (2) parietal, somatosensory
cortex; (3) occipital, visual cortex, and (4) temporal, auditory
cortex. (See Fig. 2.6 for a view of the cortical regions.) Figure
2.7
illustrates the various functions of the lobes.

Fig.
2.7
Major Structures and Functions of the
Cortex
Source: From Neil R. Carlson,
Physiology of Behavior, 5th
edition, p. 91. Copyright © 1994 by Allyn and Bacon. Reprinted with
permission
Frontal Lobes
The frontal lobes are the most anterior cortical
structures and comprise the primary motor cortex, the premotor
cortex, an area of expressive language (Broca's area), the medial
cortex, and the prefrontal cortex (Damasio & Anderson,
2003). Whereas the primary and
premotor areas of the frontal lobes have major motor functions, the
prefrontal cortex mediates reasoning and planning and monitors
other cortical and subcortical functions. The prefrontal cortex
matures the most slowly of all of the areas of the lobes.
Lesions or damage to the primary motor cortex can
result in paralysis to the contralateral side of the body, whereas
lesions to the premotor cortex can produce more complex
coordination problems because this region directs the execution of
the primary motor area (Kolb & Whishaw, 2003). Lesions or damage to the prefrontal
cortex, with its intricate connections to other brain regions,
including thalamic, hypothalamic, and limbic areas, often result in
affective dissociations, impaired executive functions and judgment,
and intellectual deficits (Lezak, Howieson, & Loring,
2004).
Primary Motor Cortex
The motor system comprises the primary motor, the
premotor, and to a lesser degree, the prefrontal, with each region
assuming differentiated motor functions. The primary motor cortex
is involved with the execution and maintenance of simple motor
functions; the premotor cortex directs the primary motor cortex;
and the prefrontal cortex influences motor planning and adds
flexibility to motor behavior as a result of input from internal
and external factors (Lezak et al., 2004).
The primary motor cortex resides immediately
anterior to the central sulcus and contains giant pyramidal cells
(Betz), which control fine motor and highly skilled voluntary
movements (Damasio & Anderson, 2003). The primary motor cortex receives afferent
(incoming sensory) signals from the parietal lobe, the cerebellum,
and the thalamus for the integration of sensory-motor signals,
while efferent (outgoing motor) signals are transmitted to the
reticular activating system, the red nucleus (midbrain structure),
the pons, and the spinal cord for the production of movement. The
primary cortex controls movements to the opposite side of the body
and is arranged in a homuncular fashion. A homunculus is a
schematic of brain function mapping onto specific body structures.
Thus, there is a specific region that is responsible for movement
of the thumb, or the ankle, or the nose that maps onto the primary
motor cortex.
Specific muscle groups of the body are
represented in an inverted pattern stretching across the primary
motor area. Stimulation to specific areas of the primary motor
cortex produces contractions of highly localized muscle areas. For
example, Broca's area resides near the primary motor area in the
left hemisphere, controls facial musculature, and mediates speech
production (Kolb & Whishaw, 2003).
Premotor Cortex
The premotor cortex, anterior to the primary
motor cortex, plays a role in controlling limb and body movements.
More complex, coordinated movements appear to be regulated at this
level, especially fluid sequential movements. The premotor cortex
directs the primary cortex in the execution and maintenance of
simple movements. The limbic system also influences the motor
cortex, directly and indirectly, primarily in terms of attentional
and motivational aspects of motor functions (Damasio &
Anderson, 2003).
Prefrontal Cortex
The prefrontal cortex, the most anterior region
of the frontal lobe, receives incoming signals from the thalamus,
which then project to the hypothalamus. Further, connections to the
limbic system allow the prefrontal cortex to mediate, regulate, and
control affective, emotional behavior. Prefrontal connections to
the temporal, parietal, and occipital association regions allow for
a comparison of past and present sensory experiences (Gazzaniga et
al., 2002). These intricate
connections of the prefrontal cortex with cortical and subcortical
regions allow for highly integrative, complex functions. Judgments
and insights arise out of prefrontal activity, whereas motor
planning, consequential thinking, and ongoing monitoring of
behavior also appear to be regulated by prefrontal regions. The
limbic system also seems to play a role in complex, intentional, or
volitional motor behaviors, though this is not considered part of
the motor area. The development of executive control functions is
discussed in more detail in later sections of this chapter. Also
see Chapter
6 for a discussion of neuropsychiatric disorders
(e.g., ADHD and Tourette syndrome) associated with frontal lobe and
executive control damage or dysfunction.
Parietal Lobes
The parietal lobe is separated from the frontal
regions by the central sulcus and from the temporal lobe by the
lateral fissure. The parietal lobes play a central role in the
perception of tactile sensory information, including the
recognition of pain, pressure, touch, proprioception, and
kinesthetic sense. The parietal lobe is comprised of three areas:
the primary sensory projection area, the secondary somatosensory
area, and the tertiary or association area (Carlson, 2007).
Primary Sensory Cortex
The primary sensory projection area is
immediately posterior to the central sulcus, adjacent to the
primary motor cortex. Some have argued that there is a great deal
of functional overlap between the sensory and motor cortical areas
with approximately one-quarter of the points in the motor area also
showing sensory capabilities and one-quarter of the points in the
sensory area also showing motor capabilities (Brodal,
2004). Thus, regions posterior to
the sulcus have been labeled as the sensory-motor area, while
regions anterior to the sulcus are labeled the motor-sensory area.
What seems most evident from this research is that the
sensory-motor regions are highly interrelated, which probably
results in increased functional efficiency.
The primary sensory projection area has four
major functions: (1) recognition of the source, quality, and
severity of pain; (2) discrimination of light pressure and
vibration; (3) recognition of fine touch (proprioception) and (4)
awareness of the position and movement of body parts (kinesthetic
sense) (Lezak et al., 2004).
Numerous fibers converge in the primary sensory projection area,
including afferents coming from the thalamus, skin, muscles,
joints, and tendons from the opposite side of the body. Lesions to
the primary parietal regions can produce sensory deficits to the
contralateral (opposite) side of the body, and other more complex
deficits can occur when the temporoparietal and/or inferior
parietal regions are involved (Tranel, 1992).
Like the primary frontal cortex, the primary
sensory projection area is arranged in a homuncular fashion, with
the proportion of cortical representation related to the need for
sensitivity in a particular body region (Brodal, 2004). For example, the region representing the
face, lips, and tongue is quite large because speech production
requires multiple sensory input from these various muscles to
provide sensory feedback to orchestrate a complex series of
movements needed for speaking. The proximity of the primary
parietal region to the primary motor regions allows for the rapid
cross-communication between sensory-motor systems that is necessary
for the execution of motor behavior.
Secondary and Association Cottices
Input from the primary sensory projection regions
is synthesized into more complex sensory forms by secondary
parietal regions. The tertiary or association region, the most
posterior area of the parietal lobe, receives input from the
primary sensory projection area and sends efferents into the
thalamus. The association region is involved with the integration
and utilization of complex sensory information. Gazzaniga et al.
(2002) indicate that the
association regions synthesize information, whereas the primary
areas are involved with finer distinctions and analysis of
information. The association region overlaps with other cortical
structures, including temporal and occipital areas for the
integration of sensory information from different modalities.
Although damage to the association region does not produce visual,
auditory, or sensory deficits, damage to the association area can
result in disorders of the integration of complex sensory
information. Cross-modal matching of visual with auditory and
sensory stimuli takes place in the association region, which is
considered to be the highest level of sensory analysis. Some argue
that this region regulates much of what is measured by intelligence
tests, including cognitive and mental functions such as thinking,
reasoning, and perception (Kolb & Whishaw, 2003).
Occipital Lobes
The most posterior region of the cortex comprises
the occipital lobe (primary visual cortex), which is further
divided into dorsal (superior) and ventral (inferior) areas. The
inferior and superior regions are divided by the lateral-occipital
sulcus, while the calcarine fissure extends from the occipital pole
into the splenium of the corpus callosum (see Fig. 2.7). The visual cortex
receives projections from the retina in each eye via the lateral
geniculate nucleus in the thalamus (see Fig. 2.8). The rods and cones
in the retina respond to photic stimulation, and photochemical
processes result in nerve impulses in the optic nerve (Carlson,
2007). Once inside the cerebrum,
the optic nerve forms the optic chiasm. The optic chiasm is where
nerve fibers partially cross, project to the lateral geniculate in
the thalamus, and converge in the visual cortex. Damage anywhere
along this pathway can produce a variety of visual defects.

Fig.
2.8
Visual Fields and Cortical Visual
Pathways
Source: From Neil R. Carlson,
Physiology of Behavior, 5th
edition, p. 149. Copyright © 1994 by Allyn and Bacon. Reprinted by
permission
The occipital lobe comprises primary, secondary,
and tertiary or association regions (Kolb & Whishaw,
2003). The primary occipital
cortex receives afferent input from the thalamus, which passes
through the temporal cortex. Damage to this tract, even if it
occurs in the temporal lobe, can produce visual field defects. The
association region is involved with complex visual perception,
relating past visual stimuli to present stimuli for the recognition
and appreciation of what is being seen. Damage to the association
region, particularly in the right hemisphere, can produce a variety
of visual deficits, including recognition of objects, faces, and
drawings.
Temporal Lobes
The temporal lobe has three major divisions: (1)
the posterior region of the superior temporal gyrus, which is
referred to as Wernicke's area in the left hemisphere; (2) the
inferior temporal region, including the occipitotemporal
association region, and (3) the mesial temporal aspect, including
the hippocampal and amygdala regions (Tranel, 1992). The temporal lobe has complex
interconnections, with afferent fibers coming from the parietal
lobe, efferent fibers projecting into the parietal and frontal
lobes, and the corpus callosum and the anterior commissure
connecting the right and left temporal lobes (Kolb & Whishaw,
2003). Three major pathways
connect the temporal lobe with other cortical regions for complex
integrated functions. The arcuate fasciculus connects the frontal
and temporal lobes, the superior longitudinal fasciculus connects
the temporal to the occipital and frontal cortices (i.e., the
sensory and motor regions of Wernicke's and Broca's areas), and the
occipitofrontal fasciculus connects the frontal-temporal-occipital
regions.
The anatomical complexity, including large
association regions, suggests that the temporal lobes have diverse
functions, including the perception of auditory sensations, the
analysis of affective tone in auditory stimuli, and long-term
memory storage. Although the temporal lobe has primary auditory
perception and association functions related to speech and language
processing, it also plays a significant role in memory functions
and in facial (prosopagnosia) and object recognition (Bauer &
Demery, 2003).
The primary temporal cortex is involved with the
perception of speech sounds, particularly in the left hemisphere,
and nonverbal tonal sequences, particularly in the right
hemisphere, while the secondary and association regions are more
complex and varied in function. The secondary and association
regions add the affective quality to stimuli that is essential for
learning to take place. When positive, negative, or neutral
affective qualities are attached to stimuli, information takes on
motivational or emotional importance to the learner. Without this
association, all stimuli would be judged as equal and we would
respond to all stimuli with the same affect or emotion (Heilman,
Blonder, Bowers, & Valenstein, 2003).
The mesial temporal region, including the
adjoining hippocampus and amygdala, appears to be linked to memory
processes and plays a role in learning or acquiring new information
(Tranel, 1992). Lesions in this
area result in impaired retention of new memories, as this region
appears to be related to the process by which new memories are
stored or are retrieved from storage (Lezak et al., 2004). Asymmetry of functions is evident in the
temporal lobes. Memory functions appear to be lateralized. The
recall of verbal information, including stories and word lists
presented either orally or visually, is stored in the left
hemisphere, whereas nonverbal recall for geometric drawings, faces,
and tunes is stored in the right hemisphere (Kolb & Whishaw,
2003).
Olfactory Bulb
The olfactory system is the only sensory system
that converges in the telencephalon. The olfactory bulb receives
sensory information concerning smell directly from the olfactory
nerve and converges with the olfactory tract; at this juncture,
axons cross to the bulb in the opposite hemisphere via the anterior
commissure. The olfactory tract projects to the primary olfactory
cortex to a small region called the uncus, close to the end of the
temporal lobe (Brodal, 2004).
Although olfactory assessment is often ignored, the sense of smell
is frequently associated with various neuropsychiatric disturbances
found in adults, particularly schizophrenia, Parkinson's disease,
multiple sclerosis, subfrontal tumors, and some brain injuries
(Heilman & Valenstein, 2003).
Limbic System
The limbic system is a complex deep collection of
structures in the forebrain comprising the hippocampus, amygdale,
septum, and cingulate gyms (Kolb & Whishaw, 2003). The limbic system has widespread
connections with the neocortex and with the autonomic and
endocrinological systems, and is considered a primitive brain
structure involved with the olfactory senses. It resides between
two brain regions (diencephalon and telencephalon) and serves as an
intermediary to cognitive and emotional functions (Wilkinson,
1986). In humans the limbic system
has less to do with the olfactory system than with emotional and
memory functions that are essential for the survival of the
species. It also has preservation functions for the
individual.
Wilkinson (1986)
describes a number of important functions of the limbic system,
including:
- (1)
analyzing and responding to fearsome, threatening situations;
- (2)
monitoring sexual responses, including reproducing and nurturing offspring;
- (3)
remembering recent and past events, and
- (4)
sensing and responding to feeling states, including pleasure.
Autonomic responses (e.g., heart rate, breathing,
blood pressure, and digestive functions) can be influenced by
limbic structures, especially the cingulate gyrus. Aggressive
reactions and social indifference have been associated with the
cingulate gyrus. The cingulate gyrus has also been associated with
error checking and self-monitoring of behavior (Semrud-Clikeman,
Pliszka, Lancaster, & Liotti, 2006). Feelings of anxiety, deja vu experiences,
rage, and fear have been associated with functions of the amygdala
(Gazzaniga et al., 2002). With its
connections with other limbic and cortical structures, the
hippocampus has broad functions involving learning and memory.
Seizure activity in limbic structures, particularly the
hippocampus, sometimes includes temporal lobe structures as well
(Lockman, 1994). Seizures at this
site may result in a temporary loss of consciousness and loss of
memory.
Basal Ganglia
The term basal
ganglia refers to all or some of the masses of gray matter
within the cerebral hemispheres, including the caudate nucleus,
putamen, and globus pallidus. The corpus striatum connects to the
neocortex and to the thalamus, and has ascending and descending
pathways to midbrain structures (red nucleus and substantia nigra),
and to the spinal cord (Brodal, 2004). Serotonin-rich connections from the raphe
nuclei also reach the striatum, the prefrontal regions, and the
limbic system. These serotonin pathways serve to inhibit motor
actions and emotional responses. The basal ganglia are intimately
involved with motor functions and, when damaged, can produce
postural changes, increases or decreases in muscle tone, and
movement changes (e.g., twitches, tremors or jerks). Sydenham’s
chorea, a childhood disease resulting from poststreptoccal
rheumatic fever involving the corpus striatum, is characterized by
irregular and purposeless movements. This disease usually appears
insidiously, gradually worsening with symptoms of hyperkinetic
movement disorder, emotional lability, and hypotonia. Rheumatic
heart disease is often found in conjunction with Sydenham's chorea
and is the cause of mortality in this disorder. The chorea
generally dissipates six months after onset, but the emotional
lability remains (Cardona et al., in press).
Summary
This chapter’s goal was to provide an
introduction to the field of neuropsychology. Defining
neuropsychology includes the study of the brain and the
transactional effect of neurology and the environment.
Neuropsychologists are specialists in assessment and intervention,
and specific and intensive training is necessary for practice in
this field. Child (pediatric) neuropsychologists require additional
training in child development as well as in child assessment. Adult
neuropsychologists have separate training in geriatric, adult
disorders, and neuroanatomy that is specific to aging, while child
neuropsychologists have emphasis in development and in pediatric
disorders. To that end, adult neuropsychologists should not
complete pediatric assessments without additional training and
child neuropsychologists should not complete adult assessments
without specific education.
For child neuropsychologists it is important to
have knowledge of appropriate laws that apply to education. Since
almost all of the children and adolescents that are evaluated are
in school, the most effective clinician will be informed about the
contents of IDEA, Section 504, and HIPAA to most appropriately
serve the population. Providing assessment without such knowledge
may result in less than ideal evaluations, inappropriate
interventions, and lead parents to expect services that are
unlikely to be delivered. Multicultural issues were also discussed
and it is very apparent that research and practice in this area is
seriously lacking.
This chapter also sought to provide a review of
basic anatomy of the brain and neuron in preparation for subsequent
chapters on disorders, assessment, and intervention. A review of
basic structures as well as their place in gestation and
development was provided. Some structures change dramatically
during childhood while others are basically formed prior to birth.
These changes appear to be linked to stages of cognitive and
neurological development, and the informed clinician will utilize
these developmental changes when interpreting findings. Many of the
aspects of this chapter are important to understand the next
chapter on neuroradiological methods.
References
Baron, I. S. (2004).
Neuropsychological evaluation of
the child. New York: Oxford University Press.
Bauer, R. M., & Demery,
J. A. (2003). Agnosia. In K. M. Heilman & E. Valenstein (Eds.),
Clinical neuropsychology
(4th ed., pp. 236–295). New York: Oxford.
Booth, J. R., MacWhinney, B.,
Thulborn, K. R., Sacco, K., Voyvodic, J. T., & Feldman, H. M.
(1999). Functional organization of activation patterns in children:
Whole brain fMRI imaging during three different cognitive tasks.
Progress in
neuro-psychopharmacology & biological psychiatry, 23,
669–682.Crossref
Brodal, P. (2004).
The central nervous system:
Structure and function (Vol. 3). New York: Oxford University
Press.
Cardona, F., Ventriglia, F.,
Cipolla, O., Romano, A., Creti, R., & Orefici, G. (in press). A
post-streptococcal pathogenesis in children with tic disorders is
suggested by a color Doppler echocardiographic study. European Journal of Neurology.
Carlson, N. R. (2007).
Physiology of behavior (9th
ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Cody, J., Semrud-Clikeman,
M., Hardies, L. J., Lancaster, J., Ghidoni, P., Schaub, R. L., et
al. (2005). Growth hormone benefits children with 18q deletions.
American Journal of Human
Genetics, 143A, 1181–1190, 1–7.
Cohen, M. E., & Duggner,
P. K. (1994). Tumors of the brain and spinal cord including
leukemic involvement. In K. F. Swaiman (Ed.), Pediatric neurology. St. Louis, MO:
Mosby.
Damasio, A. R., &
Anderson, S. W. (2003). The frontal lobes. In K. M. Heilman &
E. Valenstein (Eds.), Clinical
neuropsychology (4th ed., pp. 404–446). New York:
Oxford.
Fine, J. G.,
Semrud-Clikeman, M., Keith, T. Z., Stapleton, L., & Hynd, G. W.
(2006). Reading and the corpus callosum: An MRI family study of
volume and area. Neuropsychology,
21(2), 235–241.Crossref
Fletcher, J. M., Dennis, M.,
& Northrup, H. (2000). Hydrocephalus. In K. O. Yeates, D. M.
Ris, & H. G. Taylor (Eds.), Pediatric neuropsychology (pp. 25–46).
New York: Guilford Press.
Fletcher, J. M., &
Taylor, H. (1984). Neuropsychological approaches to children:
Toward a developmental neuropsychology. Journal of Clinical Neuropsychology, 6,
39–56.Crossref
Galaburda, A. M., Sherman,
G. P., Rosen, G. D., Aboitiz, F., & Geschwind, N. (1985).
Developmental dyslexia: Four consecutive patients with cortical
anomalies. Annals of Neurology,
18, 222–233.Crossref
Gazzaniga, M. S., Ivry, R.
B., & Mangun, G. R. (2002). Cognitive neuroscience: The biology of the
mind (2nd ed.). New York: W.W. Norton & Company.
Goldberg, E., & Costa,
L. D. (1981). Hemisphere differences in the acquisition and use of
descriptive systems. Brain and
Language, 14, 144–173.Crossref
Heilman, K. M., Blonder, L.
X., Bowers, D., & Valenstein, E. (2003). Emotional disorders
associated with neurological diseases. In K. M. Heilman & E.
Valenstein (Eds.), Clinical
neuropsychology (4th ed., pp. 447–478). New York:
Oxford.
Heilman, K. M., &
Valenstein, E. (2003). Clinical
neuropsychology (4th ed.). New York: Oxford University
Press.
Hinton, G. E. (1993). How
neural networks learn from experience. In Mind and brain: Readings from the Scientific
American. New York: W.H. Freeman.
Hunter, S. B., Varma, V.,
Shehata, B., Nolen, J. D., Cohen, C., Olson, J. J., et al. (2005).
Apolipoprotein D expression in primary brain tumors: Analysis by
quantitative RT-PCR in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue.
The Journal of Histochemistry and
Cytochemistry, 53, 963–969.Crossref
Hynd, G. W.,
Semrud-Clikeman, M., Lorys, A. R., Novey, E. S., & Eliopulos,
D. (1990). Brain morphology in developmental dyslexia and attention
deficit disorder/hyperactivity. Archives of neurology, 47,
919–926.Crossref
Hynd, G. W.,
Semrud-Clikeman, M., Lorys, A. R., Novey, E. S., & Eliopulos,
D. (1991). Corpus callosum morphology in attention
deficit-hyperactivity disorder (ADHD): Morphometric analysis of
MRI. Journal of Learning
Disabilities, 24, 141–146.Crossref
Kandel, E. R., Schwartz, J.
H., & Jessell, T. M. (2000a). Principles of neural science (4th ed.).
New York: McGraw Hill.
Kandel, E. R., Schwartz, J.
H., & Jessell, T. M. (2000b). Principles of neural science (4th ed.).
New York: McGraw-Hill.
Kinsbourne, M. (2003). The
corpus callosum equilibrates the cerebral hemispheres. In E. Zaidal
& M. Iacoboni (Eds.), The
parallel brain: The cognitive neuroscience of the corpus
callosum (pp. 271–281). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Klein-Tasman, B. P.,
Phillips, K. D., & Kelderman, J. K. (2007). Genetic syndromes
associated with intellectual disability. In S. J. Hunter & J.
Donders (Eds.), Pediatric
neuropsychological intervention (pp. 193–223). Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
Kolb, B., & Fantie, B.
(1989). Development of the child's brain and behavior. In C. R.
Reynolds & E. F. Janzen (Eds.), Handbook of child clinical
neuropsychology (pp. 115–144). New York: Plenum Press.
Kolb, B., & Whishaw, I.
Q. (2003). Fundamentals of human
neuropsychology (5th ed.). New York: Worth Publishers.
Konczak, J., Schoch, B.,
Dimitrova, A., Gizewski, E., & Timmann, D. (2005). Functional
recovery of children and adolescents after cerebellar tumour
resection. Brain: A Journal of
Neurology, 128, 1428–1441.Crossref
Larsen, J. P., Hoeien, T.,
& Oedegaard, H. (1992). Magnetic resonance imaging of the
corpus callosum in developmental dyslexia. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 9(2),
123–134.Crossref
Lezak, M. D., Howieson, D.
B., & Loring, D. W. (2004). Neuropsychological assessment (4th
ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.
Liotti, M. P., Pliszka,
S.R., Perez, R., Luus, B., Glahn, D., & Semrud-Clikeman, M.
(2007). Electrophysiological correlates of response inhibition in
children and adolescents with ADHD: Influence of gender, age, and
previous treatment history. Psychophysiology, 44,
936–948.Crossref
Lockman, L. A. (1994).
Nonabsence generalized seizures. In K. F. Swaiman (Ed.),
Pediatric neurology (2nd
ed., pp. 261–270). St Louis: Mosby.
McDermott, K. B., Watson, J.
M., & Ojemann, J. G. (2005). Presurgical language mapping.
Current Directions in
Psychological Science, 14, 291–295.Crossref
Morris, R. D., Krawiecki, N.
S., Kullgren, K. A., Ingram, S. M., & Kurczynski, B. (2000).
Brain tumors. In K. O. Yeates, D. M. Ris, & H. G. Taylor
(Eds.), Pediatric neuropsychology:
Research, theory and practice (pp. 74–91). New York:
Guilford Press.
Nortz, M. J.,
Hemme-Phillips, J. M., & Ris, D. M. (2007). Neuropsychological
sequelae in children treated for cancer. In S. J. Hunter & J.
Donders (Eds.), Pediatric
neuropsychological intervention (pp. 112–132). Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
Perez-Fabello, M. J.,
Campos, A., & Gomez-Juncal, R. (2007). Visual imaging capacity
and imagery control in Fine Arts students. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 104,
815–822.Crossref
Pierce, K., Muller, R. A.,
Ambrose, J., Allen, G., & Courchesne, E. (2001). Face
processing occurs outside the fusiform 'face area' in autism:
Evidence from functional MRI. Brain, 124, 2059–2073.Crossref
Pliszka, S. R. (2003).
Neuroscience for the mental health
clinician. New York: Guilford Press.
Pliszka, S. R., Glahn, D.
C., Semrud-Clikeman, M., Franklin, C., Perez, R., Xiong, J., et al.
(2006). Neuroimaging of inhibitory control areas in children with
attention deficit hyperactivity disorder who were treatment naive
or in long-term treatment. American Journal of Psychiatry, 163(6),
1052–1060.Crossref
Rosen, G. D., Galaburda, A.
M., & Sherman, G. F. (1990). The ontogeny of anatomic
asymmetry: Constraints derived from basic mechanisms. In A. B.
Scheibel & A. F. Wechsler (Eds.), Neurobiology of higher cognitive
function (pp. 215–238). New York: Guilford Press.
Sagvolden, T., & Archer,
T. (1989). Attention deficit
disorder: Clinical and basic research. Hillsdale, NJ:
Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Scheibel, A. B. (1990).
Dendritic correlates of higher cognitive function. In A. B.
Scheibel & A. F. Wechsler (Eds.), Neurobiology of higher cognitive
function (pp. 239–270). New York: Guilford Press.
Semrud-Clikeman, M. (2007).
Social competence in
children. New York: Springer.Crossref
Semrud-Clikeman, M.,
Filipek, P. A., Biederman, J., Steingard, R. J., Kennedy, D. N.,
Renshaw, P. F., et al. (1994). Attention-deficit hyperactivity
disorder: Magnetic resonance imaging morphometric analysis of the
corpus callosum. Journal of the
American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry,
33(6), 875–881.Crossref
Semrud-Clikeman, M., Fine,
J. G., & Bledsoe, J. (2008). Meta-analysis of empirical literature on
NVLD. Paper presented at the International
Neuropsychological Society.
Semrud-Clikeman, M., Hynd,
G. W., Novey, E. S., & Eliopulos, D. (1991). Dyslexia and brain
morphology: Relationships between neuroanatomical variation and
neurolinguistic tasks. Learning
and Individual Differences, 3(3), 225–242.Crossref
Semrud-Clikeman, M.,
Pliszka, S. R., Lancaster, J., & Liotti, M. (2006). Volumetric
MRI differences in treatment-naïve vs chronically treated children
with ADHD. Neurology,
67(1023–1027).Crossref
Shepherd, G. M. (2004).
The synaptic organization of the
brain (5th ed.). New York: Oxford University
Press.Crossref
Sklar, C. A. (2002).
Childhood brain tumors. Journal of
Pediatric Endocrinology and Metabolism, 15,
669–673.Crossref
Swaiman, K. F., Ashwal, S.,
& Ferriero, D. M. (2006). Pediatric neurology (4th ed.). San
Diego: Mosby.
Tranel, D. (1992).
Functional neuroanatomy: Neuropsychological correlates of cortical
and subcortical damage. In S. C. Yudofsky & R. E. Hales (Eds.),
The American Psychiatric Press
textbook of neuropsychiatry (2nd ed., pp. 57–88).
Washington, D.C.: American Psychiatric Association.
Wilkinson, J. L. (1986).
Neuroanatomy for medical
students. Bristol BSI: John Wright & Son Ltd.
Witelson, S. F. (1990).
Structural correlates of cognitive function in the human brain. In
A. B. Scheibel & A. F. Wechsler (Eds.), Neurobiology of higher cognitive
function (pp. 167–184). New York: Guilford Press.
Witelson, S. F., &
Kigar, D. L. (1988). Anatomical development of the corpus callosum
in humans: A review with reference to sex and cognition. In D. L.
Molfese & S. J. Segalowitz (Eds.), Brain lateralization in children (pp.
35–57). New York: Guilford Press.
Zaidal, E., Clark, M., &
Suyenobu, B. (1990). Hemispheric independence: A paradigm case for
cognitive neuroscience. In A. B. Scheibel & A. F. Wechsler
(Eds.), Neurobiology of higher
cognitive function (pp. 297–356). New York: Guilford
Press.
Zaidel, E., Iacoboni, M.,
Zaidel, D. W., & Bogen, J. E. (2003). The callosal syndromes.
In K. M. Heilman & E. Valenstein (Eds.), Clinical neuropsychology (4th ed., pp.
347–403). New York: Oxford.