8
AT THE EASEL
Myatt put Amy and Sam in their pajamas,
tucked them in, and read them their bedtime stories. When they had
drifted off to sleep, he went down to the living room and cleared
off the table. Closing the curtains, he turned on the lamp and
returned to the Giacometti he’d been working on for the past few
days.
He had become extremely cautious, even paranoid,
about being seen at work. He painted only at night. After he’d
pocketed Drewe’s money for the Gleizes he could no longer deny that
what he was doing was illegal. In the back of his mind, he was
always afraid of being caught. A neighbor might drop in
unannounced, put two and two together, and turn him in. Or the
children might innocently tell the babysitter that Dad was painting
all the time, and then she’d go to the police and inform them that
she suspected her employer was engaged in forgery.
It was all quite irrational, of course, but Myatt’s
livelihood now depended entirely on Drewe, and he couldn’t take any
chances. With a little luck Drewe would sell one or two more
pieces, and then Myatt would get out of the game. He’d be able to
cover the rent for a few more months while he looked for a
legitimate source of income.
He returned to the canvas, dabbed the brush into a
pot of gray, and made several bold strokes around the figure in the
center.
It had occurred to him, once he consciously
acknowledged that he was in the business of making fakes, that a
good forger had to go beyond technique to avoid detection, so he’d
been around to the galleries and museums to stand as close to
Giacometti’s paintings as he could without attracting the attention
of the security guards. The Swiss artist was famous for his
elongated, ethereal bronze sculptures, but his paintings were
equally masterful, with a distinctive palette of blacks, whites,
and grays, and a few strokes of primary color. To paint a decent
Giacometti, Myatt would have to adopt the artistic vision of the
man whose creative expression he had chosen to appropriate. He
would have to set aside his own preconceptions about what could be
achieved in a work of art and see the work through its “creator’s”
eyes. He would have to become Giacometti.
Myatt had found some good biographical material on
Giacometti and had read up on his techniques, looking for telltale
quirks that would convince the experts that what they were seeing
was the master’s handiwork. He’d read about Giacometti’s marriage
and his numerous affairs. He’d discovered that the artist was
injured in a car accident that left him limping around the studio
with a cane, and that he smoked four packs of cigarettes a day,
drank countless cups of coffee, worked until dawn, and rarely
slept.
Every detail of Alberto’s work habits would come in
handy.
Was he right- or left-handed?
How did he hold the brush?
What kind of light did he favor?
Was he prone to reworking a painting ad
infinitum?
Was there ever a sense of closure, of satisfaction
with the outcome?
For Giacometti, there was not. He considered many
of his masterpieces failures and could never manage to leave a work
alone.
“The more one works on a picture, the more
impossible it becomes to finish it,” he once said. One artist and
writer called his artistic process an “obsessive paring down.” When
Giacometti was sculpting, his hands “would flutter up and down a
piece, pinching and gouging and incising the clay, in a seemingly
hopeless, even heartbreaking, struggle for verisimilitude.”12
Giacometti began to resemble his own creations. His
frame
became thinner, his face more haggard, his hair
ever paler with plaster dust. It was as though he’d been boiled
down to his essence. In the end he resembled an armature of a man,
a bonhomme of gnarled steel and chicken wire, smoking in the corner
café. Once, when he was already rich, a lady saw him sitting
forlorn, took pity on him and offered to buy him a cup of coffee.
He accepted at once, his eyes brimming with gratitude and
joy.13
Myatt could definitely relate, but that didn’t seem
to help much. His canvas was a plain composition of a nude woman
emerging from blue-gray shadows, a copy of one of three basic
figures Giacometti had painted again and again: the standing nude,
the seated figure, and the walking man. Ever since he was an art
student, Myatt had admired them. He thought they were simple
constructions that would be easy enough to imitate. He was
wrong.
The Swiss artist had his own unique energy,
painting in a tangle of lines that seemed both calculated and
frenzied. His nudes were full-figured and so evocative that Myatt
could almost feel the bones beneath the flesh. His mysterious
images seemed to emerge from the canvas as if they were about to
step out into the room.
How had Giacometti managed it?
Myatt lashed at the canvas, then stood back. The
nude looked emaciated. He moved in again and worked on the torso,
dabbing at the rib cage to put meat on the bones. This improved
things a little, but the arms looked wrong.
The more he tried to copy Giacometti’s style, the
more elusive it seemed. He’d already scrapped one attempt at the
standing nude because it was utterly lifeless, like a puppet on a
string. He’d tried hard to correct it, to harness Giacometti, but
it was no use. He’d lost his focus. Now he was failing at his
second attempt. He began to question his own talent and consider
the potentially disastrous consequences of his new endeavor. What
would happen if he got caught? He would never survive the loss of
his children and his farmhouse.
In a fit of anger and frustration, he took a bucket
of white paint and splashed it onto the canvas. The nude
disappeared. When he finally calmed down, he smoothed the surface
over with a brush and set the canvas aside to dry. He would use it
again to give the nude one more shot.
Myatt’s third attempt began promisingly
enough, but again the figure he envisioned vanished with each
brushstroke the more he worked on it. It would have been easier if
he’d been able to use a live model, as Giacometti had. The artist
had always painted from life (his wife was one of his favorite
models), demanding absolute stillness and concentration from his
subject. He would spend months on a single painting, sometimes
sitting a few feet from the model while he worked. He would ask her
to look straight at him until she was within his gravitational arc,
and then he would reel her into the canvas.
Myatt feared it would be too risky to bring in a
model, so each night, after he pulled out his old Winsor &
Newton easel and put his cans of paint on the table and began to
mix black and white and all the shades in between he could find, he
would imagine the nude in his living room. He had been trying to
keep this image fresh in his mind for several days now, struggling
to re-create the precise tilt of the head and the right proportion
of limb to torso, but he just couldn’t transpose his mental image
onto the canvas. He dabbed again at the nude’s arms, then
lengthened the legs and stepped back. It was better, but he still
didn’t have it. The feet looked wrong, as if they were anchored to
the canvas.
Sometimes he could tell right away whether a piece
was ready. If not, he would wait until early the next morning, when
he could look at it with a fresh eye. Tonight he worked on the nude
until he was too tired to think and his vision faded. Then he
leaned the canvas against the wall, covered it, and put the paints
away.
In bed, Myatt tossed and turned. When it was hard
to sleep, as it often was these days, he would lie there and try to
drift back to his childhood. He’d been four years old when his
father moved the family out of the city to Sugnall. There was
always music in the farmhouse. Mom and Dad would stand at the
piano, and Dad would make like an Italian tenor while his boy sang
along with perfect pitch. John had taught himself piano, and they’d
set him up in the parlor next to a windup gramophone to play along
with Anton Karas’s zither music and Frankie Laine’s honking High
Sierra yowls. It was clear to his parents, who sang Mendelssohn in
the village choir society, that the boy had a good ear and a degree
of artistic talent. They had no television, so when they sat him
down on the floor with his crayons and pencils, he would tumble
into a world of Beano comics, chocolate Smarties, and Spitfire
fighter aircraft, drawing mosaics of color and spark, Gauls at the
bonfire and Saxons coming up over the hill. By the age of six he
could sketch a credible and expressive human figure, a skill that
came as easily to him as repeating a melody after a single listen.
With his colored pencils and sheets of paper, he was as good as
gone.
For the teenage Myatt, 1960s Britain was a grand
place to be. He left a private cathedral school for a public
education, developed a strong physique, and grew a good head of
hair. His talent for portraiture was such that whenever he had his
sketchbook out the girls would come around to see what he was up
to. He played a little guitar and favored bell-bottoms and
tie-dyes. His parents put up with his scruffy appearance because he
was enthusiastic and persistent about his studies. During holidays
he worked construction on the M6, England’s north-south highway,
and drove an ice-cream truck that played Mozart over its speakers.
In his spare time he sketched whenever he could, for the pure joy
of it. Then he went to art school, where joy gradually turned to
defeat as his work was found wanting, despite his relentless
attention to technical detail—or perhaps because of it.
Myatt rolled over for the umpteenth time and
punched his pillow. He wondered what his professors would think of
him now. Well, at least he was still obsessed with getting it
right. He’d been lying awake half the night brooding about the
Giacometti he’d promised Drewe.
In the morning, when Amy and Sam were settled in
the kitchen with bowls of mashed bananas and yogurt, he walked into
the living room and turned the canvas over.
The nude was a bust. He had failed to crack the
code. He’d have to start from scratch again. Frustrated, he called
Drewe to say he would be late with the delivery.
“I can’t get the feet right,” he told the
professor.
“Don’t worry,” said Drewe. “Just hide them. Paint
in a bowl of fruit or a piece of furniture. No one will know the
difference.”
Drewe wanted the painting sooner rather than later
because he had an interested buyer, but Myatt argued that the piece
would never pass muster. As far as he knew, Giacometti had never
painted a standing nude with an object in the foreground. Any
dealer would know that. Worse still, the nude, like all his other
forgeries, had been painted with ordinary house paint. Suspicious
of the composition, a dealer might scrutinize the paint. Myatt had
stopped using proper oil paints about a year before meeting Drewe
because they were too expensive and took too long to dry. Besides,
the smell of the solvents used to mix oils gave him a
headache.
Regular house paint, on the other hand, came in
large, affordable cans. Within five miles of his home he could find
any color he wanted, from Tuscan Gold to Aegean Green. It wasn’t
the most elegant medium, but after some experimentation he
discovered that adding a little lubricant jelly to the paint helped
make the brushstrokes “move” across the canvas, just as if they’d
been done with oils. The jelly made the paint more viscous, and
with the right mix it held to the canvas with greater definition
and produced a richer color. A little varnish sprayed on the work
added depth and luminosity.
Apart from Myatt’s general preference for the
modernists, paint was the principal reason for his reluctance to go
back too far in time with his forgeries. Any attempt to duplicate
sixteenth- or seventeenth-century works would have required more
effort than he was prepared to expend. He would have had to scour
herbal shops for the base ingredients of the old masters’ pigments:
beechwood soot to make bister; a certain South American insect to
make carmine red. He would have had to grind lapis lazuli for the
beautiful pure blue—now replaced by the synthetic French
ultramarine blue—for which patrons had once paid extra if the
artist would include it in their portraits. It would have been fun
to find these ancient sources, but Myatt didn’t have the financial
or emotional resources to do it. He told Drewe about his choice of
materials.
“Don’t worry,” Drewe assured him. “No one’s going
to ask for a paint sample.” Even if they did, he said, a chip of
new paint could be interpreted as a sign of recent restoration
rather than proof of forgery. It was well-known that restorers
dealing with a badly damaged work often repainted part of the
canvas in an attempt to re-create the artist’s intention.
Besides, Drewe said, he had come up with a new
approach to age Myatt’s works: by impregnating the paint with
turpentine and linseed oil, then placing the canvas in a
pressurized container to force the oil into the paint’s nuclear
structure. Under analysis, he told Myatt, the house paint would
show up as oil paint.
Myatt had nearly run through the £12,500 from the
Gleizes and was in no position to argue with Drewe. If the
professor could create a facsimile of fifty-year-old paint in his
lab, all the better, but in the end it wasn’t about materials. It
was about attitude. If he approached a painting with the right
energy, he usually came up with something decent.
Myatt hung up. That night, after the children were
asleep he returned to the canvas and painted a table in the
foreground, cutting the figure off at the knees. The standing nude
had become the Footless Woman.
When the paint was dry he took the canvas down to
London in his old Land Rover and met Drewe in the parking lot
outside the Spaniard’s Inn, a four-hundred-year-old pub in
Hampstead Garden Suburb. He expected Drewe to take one look at it
and turn it down, but the professor seemed pleased enough.
“Great work, John,” he said. “We’ll sell it, no
problem at all.”
Myatt thought the nude was crap, truncated and
off-kilter, but he was touched by Drewe’s kindness. They shook
hands, and Myatt drove off into the night.