3. The “Temple” Hypothesis
This third hypothesis
is that Iapetus was designed as a kind of “temple world” and placed
in its precise orbital positioning to model, and “sacralize”
various “hyper-dimensional” physics and mathematics. In short, it
is the geometries present on Iapetus and in its orbital mechanics
that the “rescue ark” and “deathstar” hypotheses cannot
explain.662
There is much to
commend this last hypothesis, including something that Hoagland
does not mention, though it is clearly implied from his extensive
remarks throughout his paper, and it was surely in his mind when he
proposed this hypothesis, and that is that the “Temple Hypothesis”
would certainly square with the type of religious world-view
evident in the ancient myths we have examined in this book, and
with the preoccupation of Mesopotamian, Egyptian, and later,
Graeco-Roman civilizations to build temples embodying precisely
such mathematical relationships. This, the “Ark Hypothesis” cannot
do.
But I am bold to
suggest that his “Deathstar” hypothesis can account for these geometries, for as has been
repeatedly argued not only here but in my previous books, any
weapons system based on scalar physics would seek to embody as many
geometric analogues of local celestial systems and their mechanics
into its structure as possible, in order to
make it the most efficient resonator of those local space-time
geometries. One would come to expect such redundancies, and such orbital
mechanics, for they would serve a functional purpose for the weapons system.
Similarly, as we have also pointed out in this book, such a physics
can also be made the basis, in one and the same system, for a
powerful interstellar communications network. So yet another
possibility is that Iapetus may form some component or “base of
operations” in such a network.
Moreover, Hoagland’s
“Deathstar” hypothesis shares something in common with his “Temple
Hypothesis” and that is that there is a mythological context in
which it makes perfect sense: the war of the Titans, the giants of
old, to overthrow the “first god” Kronos, Saturn. This fact,
coupled with the fact observed earlier in this book that Saturn is
often, for some reason lost to history, portrayed in conjunction
with Mars, the god of war. Viewed in this light, Hoagland perhaps
may have abandoned his “Deathstar” hypothesis too
quickly.
In any case, our
examination of the extra-terrestrial evidence for an ancient
interplanetary civilization and war is now complete. Only one final
problem remains: the antiquity of its observers and combatants
themselves...