1. A Chronological Outline Emerges
Putting these
observations together with Van Flandern’s Multiple Exploded Planet
Hypothesis, the Sumerian Enuma Elish,
and the Edfu texts, one has a “primordial revolt” occurring
somewhere between shortly after the initial creation and 65,000,000
years ago, with the explosion of the large planet in the asteroid
belt, with the resulting evidence of a massive catastrophe that
occurred at approximately that time that exists in the K/T
geological boundary layer.
After this, a “second
creation” occurs which repairs the damage. It is important to note
that both the “Gap Theory” and the Edfu building texts, with their
emphasis on the creation of a second “island” at the Rostau, both
maintain more or less the same sequence of events.
Following this, there
is a period in which there is a civilization that appears to exist
on Mars, the Earth, and possibly the Moon, and then a second,
smaller planetary explosion ca. 3,200,000 years ago, according to
Van Flandern. This event, it will be recalled, did not leave
sufficient geological evidence of its occurrence on the earth, and
thus Van Flandern was led to modify his initial theory and to posit
that it was the explosion of a much smaller celestial body. But as
will be recalled, I posited an alternative explanation for the
relative absence of such a layer as the K/T layer for this event,
and that was that it may be possible that this more recent event
occurred when the exploding planet, and the earth, were at their
farthest distance from each other. In this case, such damage as
would be recorded in the geological data would be of a more random
and sporadic nature, as the earth subsequently moved through the
“debris” field of this explosion.
Another point should
be observed, and that is the presence within the Great Pyramid’s
remaining limestone, of small fossils dating to about 5,000,000
years ago. This would tend to indicate the very remote possibility
that, while not built in time for the 65,000,000 years event, it
may have been very remotely possible for it to have been built in
time for the event at 3,200,000 years ago. However, most of the
other chronological data concerning the Pyramid would definitely
exclude this possibility, since they indicate the structure is only
thousands of years old, and possibly pre-dates the Flood event at
10,500 BC, by some unknown number of years.
Sometime after this
second planetary explosion, we have the possibility of a third
event, the “Flood event” ca. 10,500 -15,000 years ago.
As noted previously,
the explosion of a large water-bearing Saturn-sized planetary mass,
which may have been home to intelligent life, would have had two
possible confirmations: (1) such life would likely have been, by
human standards, of very large, or “gigantic” stature; and (2) the
explosion of a water-bearing planet of that size would have
concussed its nearest neighbor, Mars, with a shock wave of water
and debris that would have scoured the hemisphere of that planet
that faced the exploding planet, and inundated the other hemisphere
with a truly planet-wide deluge. This shock wave would have reached
the earth in a dissipated form, causing similar wide-spread
planetary damage.
In any case, viewing
the texts in this light against the backdrop of Van Flandern’s
Multiple Exploded Planet Hypothesis highlights one fact about the
cosmic war, if one ascribes both
planetary explosions to that war, and that is, the war was
cosmic not only in
its breadth in space but
for its duration in time.
This scenario would
also imply the following types of corroborating evidence:
1. The presence of anomalous features on the planets Mars, and the Moons of Jupiter and Saturn, suggesting an artificial origin since the texts as studied in pervious chapters indicate the involvement of these planets in the war and its resulting destruction;
2. The presence of anomalous features on the Earth’s Moon suggesting a similar artificial origin;
3. Moreover, these features, if their artificial nature is established, should in turn indicate a common cultural origin and technology, i.e., they should be similar in appearance;
4. Following the suggestions of the Mesopotamian and Biblical traditions, there should be evidence of the chimerical, giant offspring of the unions of the “gods” and humans, a point already explored in chapter four;
5. There should also be evidence of the antiquity of mankind on earth prior to the standard theories of human origins, and/or evidence of the presence of intelligent life on earth in great antiquity;
6. There should be evidence of the existence of a weaponizable physics capable of wreaking planetary-wide damage and of destroying a planet in its entirety, a point which has already been argued; and finally,
7. There should be evidence of intentional destruction on the surfaces of the above planets, or at the minimum, evidence of anomalous patterns of destruction on those planets.
This list does not
change significantly if one takes the alternative dates of the
scenario, based on the event of 3,200,000 years ago being the main
event. If, however, one takes my suggestion that the event at
3,200,000 years ago was the main event, as Van Flanden himself
initially proposed, and that a K/T-like boundary layer is missing
from the earth simply due to its distance from that explosion, then
the above chronology is modified accordingly. In this case, while
the celestial mechanics become much more improbable, the scenario
would seem to square with the chronology suggested by the
mythological texts which always seem to imply
human observers to the events, and early mankind begins to
emerge circa this time frame according to the standard
theories.
Either way one wishes
to view the chronological problem, however, one thing should now be
abundantly clear, and that is that the ancient traditions of a
cosmic war and the implications of the Multiple Exploded Planet
Hypothesis fit together with enough exactitude to allow this set of
corroborative evidence to be constructed. The likelihood of the
cosmic war hypothesis consequently increases with the fulfillment
of each of the seven above criteria of corroborative
evidences.
But one serious
question remains.