B. Tossing Comets at the Sun: McCanney’s Version
As was seen above, De
Santillana and Von Dechind referred to the frightful deed of the
“Children of Heaven” as having been to “nudge the sun out of
place”, which they understood to be a metaphor of the alteration of
the angle of the Earth’s rotation relative to the plane of the
ecliptic. But might there be an additional interpretation, one of
actually somehow “nudging” the Sun, of disturbing it in some
fashion that would have dire consequences for the solar
system?
The first to give a
hint of this possibility is alternative researcher, and physicist
James M. McCanney. He reproduces the following photograph which
came from the SOHO satellite, a satellite which “monitors the sun
on a daily basis.”212 To appreciate the
significance of the photograph in McCanney’s view, it is necessary
to understand a little about his theory of the electro-dynamic
solar system, and comets.
For McCanney, as for
the plasma physicists, the solar system is not electrically
neutral. The Sun, of course, pours out a prodigious amount of
electrical and nuclear energy every day. But in McCanney’s view as
in the plasma cosmologists’s view, this means that on occasion and
under certain conditions, the planets themselves can become
electrically polarized, and thus, filamentary current can arc
between various bodies when the charge is sufficient or when one polarized body approaches near enough to
another differently polarized body. And this holds true for
comets as for any other body. In short, comets are not electrically
neutral, and their corona or “tail” is a sign of this
effect.
Now let us consider
the 1998 SOHO picture of the Sun.
McCanney’s Comets “Shot Across the Bows” from the 1998
SOHO Satellite Picture
Note in the upper
left hand corner one sees the Sun, and note the large solar flare.
The two “comets” are clearly visible, with one very near the solar
flare.
Now let us cite
McCanney in full:
Unexpectedly the two streaking comets came directly into the solar vicinity and flew directly through the intense solar flare to the lower right of the sun. The first comet apparently missed by just a small amount whereas the second made a direct hit through the flare ....The cover figure has far more meaning than that of just a few comets passing by the sun. Along with the immense solar which “the experts” said was mere coincidence, came a buzz out of the high levels of the national and international security agencies who monitor space for any intruders. The word from these sources was that this was a “shot over the bow” or also saying “look what we can do...look how accurately we can aim these puppies”. This is not me talking, but as I said, this was the buzz out of the security agencies.213
McCanney is implying,
in other words, that the comets were artificially and intelligently
targeted at the sun, and moreover, that they were polarized in such
a fashion as to cause the solar flare.
In other words, the immense flare, a plasma
discharge, was not electrically neutral, but of one
electrical polarity, and the comet was of another. And this, of
course, is implying that someone was doing the “shooting”, had the
technology to do the shooting, and that
it was not us. How else account for the
fact that the “comets,” to use McCanney’s apt wording,
“unexpectedly” came near the sun?
But all this is
merely prologue....