MY DEAR FRIEND: Solicitous and anxious as I
have ever been to form your heart, your mind, and your manners, and
to bring you as near perfection as the imperfection of our natures
will allow, I have exhausted, in the course of our correspondence,
all that my own mind could suggest, and have borrowed from others
whatever I thought could be useful to you; but this has necessarily
been interruptedly and by snatches. It is now time, and you are of
an age to review and to weigh in your own mind all that you have
heard, and all that you have read, upon these subjects; and to form
your own character, your conduct, and your manners, for the rest of
your life; allowing for such improvements as a further knowledge of
the world will naturally give you. In this view I would recommend
to you to read, with the greatest attention, such books as treat
particularly of those subjects; reflecting seriously upon them, and
then comparing the speculation with the practice.
For example, if you read in the morning some
of La Rochefoucault's maxims; consider them, examine them well, and
compare them with the real characters you meet with in the evening.
Read La Bruyere in the morning, and see in the evening whether his
pictures are like. Study the heart and the mind of man, and begin
with your own. Meditation and reflection must lay the foundation of
that knowledge: but experience and practice must, and alone can,
complete it. Books, it is true, point out the operations of the
mind, the sentiments of the heart, the influence of the passions;
and so far they are of previous use: but without subsequent
practice, experience, and observation, they are as ineffectual, and
would even lead you into as many errors in fact, as a map would do,
if you were to take your notions of the towns and provinces from
their delineations in it. A man would reap very little benefit by
his travels, if he made them only in his closet upon a map of the
whole world. Next to the two books that I have already mentioned, I
do not know a better for you to read, and seriously reflect upon,
than 'Avis d'une Mere d'un Fils, par la Marquise de Lambert'. She
was a woman of a superior understanding and knowledge of the world,
had always kept the best company, was solicitous that her son
should make a figure and a fortune in the world, and knew better
than anybody how to point out the means. It is very short, and will
take you much less time to read, than you ought to employ in
reflecting upon it, after you have read it. Her son was in the
army, she wished he might rise there; but she well knew, that, in
order to rise, he must first please: she says to him, therefore,
With regard to those upon whom you depend, the chief merit is to
please. And, in another place, in subaltern employments, the art of
pleasing must be your support. Masters are like mistresses:
whatever services they may be indebted to you for, they cease to
love when you cease to be agreeable. This, I can assure you, is at
least as true in courts as in camps, and possibly more so. If to
your merit and knowledge you add the art of pleasing, you may very
probably come in time to be Secretary of State; but, take my word
for it, twice your merit and knowledge, without the art of
pleasing, would, at most, raise you to the IMPORTANT POST of
Resident at Hamburgh or Ratisbon. I need not tell you now, for I
often have, and your own discernment must have told you, of what
numberless little ingredients that art of pleasing is compounded,
and how the want of the least of them lowers the whole; but the
principal ingredient is, undoubtedly, 'la douceur dans le
manieres': nothing will give you this more than keeping company
with your superiors. Madame Lambert tells her son, Let your
connections be with people above you; by that means you will
acquire a habit of respect and politeness. With one's equals, one
is apt to become negligent, and the mind grows torpid. She advises
him, too, to frequent those people, and to see their inside; In
order to judge of men, one must be intimately connected; thus you
see them without, a veil, and with their mere every-day merit. A
happy expression! It was for this reason that I have so often
advised you to establish and domesticate yourself, wherever you
can, in good houses of people above you, that you may see their
EVERY-DAY character, manners, habits, etc. One must see people
undressed to judge truly of their shape; when they are dressed to
go abroad, their clothes are contrived to conceal, or at least
palliate the defects of it: as full-bottomed wigs were contrived
for the Duke of Burgundy, to conceal his hump back. Happy those who
have no faults to disguise, nor weaknesses to conceal! there are
few, if any such; but unhappy those who know little enough of the
world to judge by outward appearances. Courts are the best keys to
characters; there every passion is busy, every art exerted, every
character analyzed; jealousy, ever watchful, not only discovers,
but exposes, the mysteries of the trade, so that even bystanders 'y
apprennent a deviner'. There too the great art of pleasing is
practiced, taught, and learned with all its graces and delicacies.
It is the first thing needful there: It is the absolutely necessary
harbinger of merit and talents, let them be ever so great. There is
no advancing a step without it. Let misanthropes and would-be
philosophers declaim as much as they please against the vices, the
simulation, and dissimulation of courts; those invectives are
always the result of ignorance, ill-humor, or envy. Let them show
me a cottage, where there are not the same vices of which they
accuse courts; with this difference only, that in a cottage they
appear in their native deformity, and that in courts, manners and
good-breeding make them less shocking, and blunt their edge. No, be
convinced that the good-breeding, the 'tournure, la douceur dans
les manieres', which alone are to be acquired at courts, are not
the showish trifles only which some people call or think them; they
are a solid good; they prevent a great deal of real mischief; they
create, adorn, and strengthen friendships; they keep hatred within
bounds; they promote good-humor and good-will in families, where
the want of good-breeding and gentleness of manners is commonly the
original cause of discord. Get then, before it is too late, a habit
of these 'mitiores virtutes': practice them upon every the least
occasion, that they may be easy and familiar to you upon the
greatest; for they lose a great degree of their merit if they seem
labored, and only called in upon extraordinary occasions. I tell
you truly, this is now the only doubtful part of your character
with me; and it is for that reason that I dwell upon it so much,
and inculcate it so often. I shall soon see whether this doubt of
mine is founded; or rather I hope I shall soon see that it is
not.
This moment I receive your letter of the 9th
N. S. I am sorry to find that you have had, though ever so slight a
return of your Carniolan disorder; and I hope your conclusion will
prove a true one, and that this will be the last. I will send the
mohairs by the first opportunity. As for the pictures, I am already
so full, that I am resolved not to buy one more, unless by great
accident I should meet with something surprisingly good, and as
surprisingly cheap.
I should have thought that Lord----, at his
age, and with his parts and address, need not have been reduced to
keep an opera w--e, in such a place as Paris, where so many women
of fashion generously serve as volunteers. I am still more sorry
that he is in love with her; for that will take him out of good
company, and sink him into bad; such as fiddlers, pipers, and 'id
genus omne'; most unedifying and unbecoming company for a man of
fashion!
Lady Chesterfield makes you a thousand
compliments. Adieu, my dear child.
LETTER
CXLVI
GREENWICH, June 10,
O. S. 1751
MY DEAR FRIEND: Your ladies were so slow in
giving their specific orders, that the mohairs, of which you at
last sent me the patterns, were all sold. However, to prevent
further delays (for ladies are apt to be very impatient, when at
last they know their own minds), I have taken the quantities
desired of three mohairs which come nearest to the description you
sent me some time ago, in Madame Monconseil's own hand; and I will
send them to Calais by the first opportunity. In giving 'la petite
Blot' her piece, you have a fine occasion of saying fine things, if
so inclined.
Lady Hervey, who is your puff and
panegyrist, writes me word that she saw you lately dance at a ball,
and that you dance very genteelly. I am extremely glad to hear it;
for (by the maxim, that 'omne majus continet in se minus'), if you
dance genteelly, I presume you walk, sit, and stand genteelly too;
things which are much more easy, though much more necessary, than
dancing well. I have known many very genteel people, who could not
dance well; but I never knew anybody dance very well, who was not
genteel in other things. You will probably often have occasion to
stand in circles, at the levees of princes and ministers, when it
is very necessary 'de payer de sa personne, et d'etre bien plante',
with your feet not too near nor too distant from each other. More
people stand and walk, than sit genteelly. Awkward, ill-bred
people, being ashamed, commonly sit bolt upright and stiff; others,
too negligent and easy, 'se vautrent dans leur fauteuil', which is
ungraceful and ill-bred, unless where the familiarity is extreme;
but a man of fashion makes himself easy, and appears so by leaning
gracefully instead of lolling supinely; and by varying those easy
attitudes instead of that stiff immobility of a bashful booby. You
cannot conceive, nor can I express, how advantageous a good air,
genteel motions, and engaging address are, not only among women,
but among men, and even in the course of business; they fascinate
the affections, they steal a preference, they play about the heart
till they engage it. I know a man, and so do you, who, without a
grain of merit, knowledge, or talents, has raised himself millions
of degrees above his level, simply by a good air and engaging
manners; insomuch that the very Prince who raised him so high,
calls him, 'mon aimable vaut-rien';-[The Marichal de
Richelieu.]-but of this do not open your lips, 'pour cause'. I give
you this secret as the strongest proof imaginable of the efficacy
of air, address, 'tournure, et tout ces Petits riens'.
Your other puff and panegyrist, Mr. Harte,
is gone to Windsor in his way to Cornwall, in order to be back soon
enough to meet you here: I really believe he is as impatient for
that moment as I am, 'et c'est tout dire': but, however,
notwithstanding my impatience, if by chance you should then be in a
situation, that leaving Paris would cost your heart too many pangs,
I allow you to put off your journey, and to tell me, as Festus did
Paul, AT A MORE CONVENIENT SEASON I WILL SPEAK TO THEE. You see by
this that I eventually sacrifice my sentiments to yours, and this
in a very uncommon object of paternal complaisance. Provided
always, and be it understood (as they say in acts of Parliament),
that 'quae te cumque domat Venus, non erubescendis adurit ignibus'.
If your heart will let you come, bring with you only your valet de
chambre, Christian, and your own footman; not your valet de place,
whom you may dismiss for the time, as also your coach; but you had
best keep on your lodgings, the intermediate expense of which will
be but inconsiderable, and you will want them to leave your books
and baggage in. Bring only the clothes you travel in, one suit of
black, for the mourning for the Prince will not be quite out by
that time, and one suit of your fine clothes, two or three of your
laced shirts, and the rest plain ones; of other things, as bags,
feathers, etc., as you think proper. Bring no books, unless two or
three for your' amusement upon the road; for we must apply simply
to English, in which you are certainly no 'puriste'; and I will
supply you sufficiently with the proper English authors. I shall
probably keep you here till about the middle of October, and
certainly not longer; it being absolutely necessary for you to pass
the next winter at Paris; so that; should any fine eyes shed tears
for your departure, you may dry them by the promise of your return
in two months.
Have you got a master for geometry? If the
weather is very hot, you may leave your riding at the 'manege' till
you return to Paris, unless you think the exercise does you more
good than the heat can do you harm; but I desire you will not leave
off Marcel for one moment; your fencing likewise, if you have a
mind, may subside for the summer; but you will do well to resume it
in the winter and to be adroit at it, but by no means for offense,
only for defense in case of necessity. Good night. Yours.
P. S. I forgot to give you one commission,
when you come here; which is, not to fail bringing the GRACES along
with you.
LETTER
CXLVII
GREENWICH, June 13,
O. S. 1751.
MY DEAR FRIEND: 'Les bienseances'-[This
single word implies decorum, good-breeding, and propriety]-are a
most necessary part of the knowledge of the world. They consist in
the relations of persons, things, time, and place; good sense
points them out, good company perfects them ( supposing always an
attention and a desire to please), and good policy recommends
them.
Were you to converse with a king, you ought
to be as easy and unembarrassed as with your own valet de chambre;
but yet, every look, word and action, should imply the utmost
respect. What would be proper and well-bred with others, much your
superiors, would be absurd and ill-bred with one so very much so.
You must wait till you are spoken to; you must receive, not give,
the subject of conversation; and you must even take care that the
given subject of such conversation do not lead you into any
impropriety. The art would be to carry it, if possible, to some
indirect flattery; such as commending those virtues in some other
person, in which that prince either thinks he does, or at least
would be thought by others to excel. Almost the same precautions
are necessary to be used with ministers, generals, etc., who expect
to be treated with very near the same respect as their masters, and
commonly deserve it better. There is, however, this difference,
that one may begin the conversation with them, if on their side it
should happen to drop, provided one does not carry it to any
subject upon which it is improper either for them to speak, or be
spoken to. In these two cases, certain attitudes and actions would
be extremely absurd, because too easy, and consequently
disrespectful. As, for instance, if you were to put your arms
across in your bosom, twirl your snuff-box, trample with your feet,
scratch your head, etc., it would be shockingly ill-bred in that
company; and, indeed, not extremely well-bred in any other. The
great difficulty in those cases, though a very surmountable one by
attention and custom, is to join perfect inward ease with perfect
outward respect.
In mixed companies with your equals (for in
mixed companies all people are to a certain degree equal), greater
ease and liberty are allowed; but they too have their bounds within
'bienseance'. There is a social respect necessary: you may start
your own subject of conversation with modesty, taking great care,
however, 'de ne jamais parler de cordes dans la maison d'un
pendu.-[Never to mention a rope in the family of a man who has been
hanged]-Your words, gestures, and attitudes, have a greater degree
of latitude, though by no means an unbounded one. You may have your
hands in your pockets, take snuff, sit, stand, or occasionally
walk, as you like; but I believe you would not think it very
'bienseant' to whistle, put on your hat, loosen your garters or
your buckles, lie down upon a couch, or go to bed, and welter in an
easychair. These are negligences and freedoms which one can only
take when quite alone; they are injurious to superiors, shocking
and offensive to equals, brutal and insulting to inferiors. That
easiness of carriage and behavior, which is exceedingly engaging,
widely differs from negligence and inattention, and by no means
implies that one may do whatever one pleases; it only means that
one is not to be stiff, formal, embarrassed, disconcerted, and
ashamed, like country bumpkins, and, people who have never been in
good company; but it requires great attention to, and a scrupulous
observation of 'les bienseances': whatever one ought to do, is to
be done with ease and unconcern; whatever is improper must not be
done at all. In mixed companies also, different ages and sexes are
to be differently addressed. You would not talk of your pleasures
to men of a certain age, gravity, and dignity; they justly expect
from young people a degree of deference and regard. You should be
full as easy with them as with people of your own years: but your
manner must be different; more respect must be implied; and it is
not amiss to insinuate that from them you expect to learn. It
flatters and comforts age for not being able to take a part in the
joy and titter of youth. To women you should always address
yourself with great outward respect and attention, whatever you
feel inwardly; their sex is by long prescription entitled to it;
and it is among the duties of 'bienseance'; at the same time that
respect is very properly and very agreeably mixed with a degree of
'enjouement', if you have it; but then, that badinage must either
directly or indirectly tend to their praise, and even not be liable
to a malicious construction to their disadvantage. But here, too,
great attention must be had to the difference of age, rank, and
situation. A 'marechale' of fifty must not be played with like a
young coquette of fifteen; respect and serious 'enjouement', if I
may couple those two words, must be used with the former, and mere
'badinage, zeste meme d'un peu de polissonerie', is pardonable with
the latter.
Another important point of 'les
bienseances', seldom enough attended to, is, not to run your own
present humor and disposition indiscriminately against everybody,
but to observe, conform to, and adopt them. For example, if you
happened to be in high good humor and a flow of spirits, would you
go and sing a 'pont neuf',-[a ballad]-or cut a caper, to la
Marechale de Coigny, the Pope's nuncio, or Abbe Sallier, or to any
person of natural gravity and melancholy, or who at that time
should be in grief? I believe not; as, on the other hand, I
suppose, that if you were in low spirits or real grief, you would
not choose to bewail your situation with 'la petite Blot'. If you
cannot command your present humor and disposition, single out those
to converse with, who happen to be in the humor the nearest to your
own.
Loud laughter is extremely inconsistent with
'les bienseances', as it is only the illiberal and noisy testimony
of the joy of the mob at some very silly thing. A gentleman is
often seen, but very seldom heard to laugh. Nothing is more
contrary to 'les bienseances' than horse-play, or 'jeux de main' of
any kind whatever, and has often very serious, sometimes very fatal
consequences. Romping, struggling, throwing things at one another's
head, are the becoming pleasantries of the mob, but degrade a
gentleman: 'giuoco di mano, giuoco di villano', is a very true
saying, among the few true sayings of the Italians.
Peremptoriness and decision in young people
is 'contraire aux bienseances', and they should seldom seem to
assert, and always use some softening mitigating expression; such
as, 's'il m'est permis de le dire, je croirais plutot, si j'ose
m'expliquer', which soften the manner, without giving up or even
weakening the thing. People of more age and experience expect, and
are entitled to, that degree of deference.
There is a 'bienseance' also with regard to
people of the lowest degree: a gentleman observes it with his
footman-even with the beggar in the street. He considers them as
objects of compassion, not of insult; he speaks to neither 'd'un
ton brusque', but corrects the one coolly, and refuses the other
with humanity. There is one occasion in the world in which 'le ton
brusque' is becoming a gentleman. In short, 'les bienseances' are
another word for MANNERS, and extend to every part of life. They
are propriety; the Graces should attend, in order to complete them;
the Graces enable us to do, genteelly and pleasingly, what 'les
bienseances' require to be done at all. The latter are an
obligation upon every man; the former are an infinite advantage and
ornament to any man. May you unite both!
Though you dance well, do not think that you
dance well enough, and consequently not endeavor to dance still
better. And though you should be told that you are genteel, still
aim at being genteeler. If Marcel should, do not you be satisfied.
Go on, court the Graces all your lifetime; you will find no better
friends at court: they will speak in your favor, to the hearts of
princes, ministers, and mistresses.
Now that all tumultuous passions and quick
sensations have subsided with me, and that I have no tormenting
cares nor boisterous pleasures to agitate me, my greatest joy is to
consider the fair prospect you have before you, and to hope and
believe you will enjoy it. You are already in the world, at an age
when others have hardly heard of it. Your character is hitherto not
only unblemished in its mortal part, but even unsullied by any low,
dirty, and ungentleman-like vice; and will, I hope, continue so.
Your knowledge is sound, extensive and avowed, especially in
everything relative to your destination. With such materials to
begin with, what then is wanting! Not fortune, as you have found by
experience. You have had, and shall have, fortune sufficient to
assist your merit and your industry; and if I can help it, you
never shall have enough to make you negligent of either. You have,
too, 'mens sana in corpore sano', the greatest blessing of all.
All, therefore, that you want is as much in your power to acquire,
as to eat your breakfast when set before you; it is only that
knowledge of the world, that elegance of manners, that universal
politeness, and those graces which keeping good company, and seeing
variety of places and characters, must inevitably, with the least
attention on your part, give you. Your foreign destination leads to
the greatest things, and your parliamentary situation will
facilitate your progress. Consider, then, this pleasing prospect as
attentively for yourself as I consider it for you. Labor on your
part to realize it, as I will on mine to assist, and enable you to
do it. 'Nullum numen abest, si sit prudentia'.
Adieu, my dear child! I count the days till
I have the pleasure of seeing you; I shall soon count the hours,
and at last the minutes, with increasing impatience.
P. S. The mohairs are this day gone from
hence for Calais, recommended to the care of Madame Morel, and
directed, as desired, to the Comptroller-general. The three pieces
come to six hundred and eighty French livres.
LETTER
CXLVIII
GREENWICH, June 20,
O. S. 1751
MY DEAR FRIEND: So very few people,
especially young travelers, see what they see, or hear what they
hear, that though I really believe it may be unnecessary with you,
yet there can be no harm in reminding you, from time to time, to
see what you see, and to hear what you hear; that is, to see and
hear as you should do. Frivolous, futile people, who make at least
three parts in four of mankind, only desire to see and hear what
their frivolous and futile precursors have seen and heard: as St.
Peter's, the Pope, and High Mass, at Rome; Notre Dame, Versailles,
the French King, and the French Comedy, in France. A man of parts
sees and hears very differently from these gentlemen, and a great
deal more. He examines and informs himself thoroughly of everything
he sees or hears; and, more particularly, as it is relative to his
own profession or destination. Your destination is political; the
object, therefore, of your inquiries and observations should be the
political interior of things; the forms of government, laws,
regulations, customs, trade, manufactures, etc., of the several
nations of Europe. This knowledge is much better acquired by
conversation with sensible and well-informed people, than by books,
the best of which upon these subjects are always imperfect. For
example, there are "Present States" of France, as there are of
England; but they are always defective, being published by people
uninformed, who only copy one another; they are, however, worth
looking into because they point out objects for inquiry, which
otherwise might possibly never have occurred to one's mind; but an
hour's conversation with a sensible president or 'conseiller' will
let you more into the true state of the parliament of Paris, than
all the books in France. In the same manner, the 'Almanack
Militaire' is worth your having; but two or three conversations
with officers will inform you much better of their military
regulations. People have, commonly, a partiality for their own
professions, love to talk of them, and are even flattered by being
consulted upon the subject; when, therefore, you are with any of
those military gentlemen (and you can hardly be in any company
without some), ask them military questions, inquire into their
methods of discipline, quartering, and clothing their men; inform
yourself of their pay, their perquisites, 'lours montres, lours
etapes', etc. Do the same as to the marine, and make yourself
particularly master of that detail; which has, and always will
have, a great relation to the affairs of England; and, in
proportion as you get good informations, take minutes of them in
writing.
The regulations of trade and commerce in
France are excellent, as appears but too plainly for us, by the
great increase of both, within these thirty years; for not to
mention their extensive commerce in both the East and West Indies,
they have got the whole trade of the Levant from us; and now supply
all the foreign markets with their sugars, to the ruin almost of
our sugar colonies, as Jamaica, Barbadoes, and the Leeward Islands.
Get, therefore, what informations you can of these matters
also.
Inquire too into their church matters; for
which the present disputes between the court and the clergy give
you fair and frequent opportunities. Know the particular rights of
the Gallican church, in opposition to the pretensions of the See of
Rome. I need not recommend ecclesiastical history to you, since I
hear that you study 'Du Pin' very assiduously.
You cannot imagine how much this solid and
useful knowledge of other countries will distinguish you in your
own (where, to say the truth, it is very little known or
cultivated), besides the great use it is of in all foreign
negotiations; not to mention that it enables a man to shine in all
companies. When kings and princes have any knowledge, it is of this
sort, and more particularly; and therefore it is the usual topic of
their levee conversations, in which it will qualify you to bear a
considerable part; it brings you more acquainted with them; and
they are pleased to have people talk to them on a subject in which
they think to shine.
There is a sort of chit-chat, or SMALL TALK,
which is the general run of conversation at courts, and in most
mixed companies. It is a sort of middling conversation, neither
silly nor edifying; but, however, very necessary for you to become
master of. It turns upon the public events of Europe, and then is
at its best; very often upon the number, the goodness or badness,
the discipline, or the clothing of the troops of different princes;
sometimes upon the families, the marriages, the relations of
princes, and considerable people; and sometimes 'sur le bon chere',
the magnificence of public entertainments, balls, masquerades, etc.
I would wish you to be able to talk upon all these things better,
and with more knowledge than other people; insomuch that upon those
occasions, you should be applied to, and that people should say, I
DARE SAY MR. STANHOPE CAN TELL US.
Second-rate knowledge and middling talents
carry a man further at courts, and in the busy part of the world,
than superior knowledge and shining parts. Tacitus very justly
accounts for a man's having always kept in favor and enjoyed the
best employments under the tyrannical reigns of three or four of
the very worst emperors, by saying that it was not 'propter aliquam
eximiam artem, sed quia par negotiis neque supra erat'. Discretion
is the great article; all these things are to be learned, and only
learned by keeping a great deal of the best company. Frequent those
good houses where you have already a footing, and wriggle yourself
somehow or other into every other. Haunt the courts particularly in
order to get that ROUTINE.
This moment I receive yours of the 18th N.
S. You will have had some time ago my final answers concerning the
pictures; and, by my last, an account that the mohairs were gone to
Madame Morel, at Calais, with the proper directions.
I am sorry that your two sons-in-law [??
D.W.], the Princes B--, are such boobies; however, as they have the
honor of being so nearly related to you, I will show them what
civilities I can.
I confess you have not time for long
absences from Paris, at present, because of your various masters,
all which I would have you apply to closely while you are now in
that capital; but when you return thither, after the visit you
intend me the honor of, I do not propose your having any master at
all, except Marcel, once or twice a week. And then the courts will,
I hope, be no longer strange countries to you; for I would have you
run down frequently to Versailles and St. Cloud, for three or four
days at a time. You know the Abbe de la Ville, who will present you
to others, so that you will soon be 'faufile' with the rest of the
court. Court is the soil in which you are to grow and flourish; you
ought to be well acquainted with the nature of it; like all other
soil, it is in some places deeper, in others lighter, but always
capable of great improvement by cultivation and experience.
You say that you want some hints for a
letter to Lady Chesterfield; more use and knowledge of the world
will teach you occasionally to write and talk genteelly, 'sup des
riens', which I can tell you is a very useful part upon worldly
knowledge; for in some companies, it would be imprudent to talk of
anything else; and with very many people it is impossible to talk
of anything else; they would not understand you. Adieu.
LETTER
CXLIX
LONDON, June 24, O.
S. 1751
MY DEAR FRIEND: Air, address, manners, and
graces are of such infinite advantage to whoever has them, and so
peculiarly and essentially necessary for you, that now, as the time
of our meeting draws near, I tremble for fear I should not find you
possessed of them; and, to tell you the truth, I doubt you are not
yet sufficiently convinced for their importance. There is, for
instance, your intimate friend, Mr. H---, who with great merit,
deep knowledge, and a thousand good qualities, will never make a
figure in the world while he lives. Why? Merely for want of those
external and showish accomplishments, which he began the world too
late to acquire; and which, with his studious and philosophical
turn, I believe he thinks are not worth his attention. He may, very
probably, make a figure in the republic of letters, but he had ten
thousand times better make a figure as a man of the world and of
business in the republic of the United Provinces, which, take my
word for it, he never will.
As I open myself, without the least reserve,
whenever I think that my doing so can be of any use to you, I will
give you a short account of myself. When I first came into the
world, which was at the age you are of now, so that, by the way,
you have got the start of me in that important article by two or
three years at least,-at nineteen I left the University of
Cambridge, where I was an absolute pedant; when I talked my best, I
quoted Horace; when I aimed at being facetious, I quoted Martial;
and when I had a mind to be a fine gentleman, I talked Ovid. I was
convinced that none but the ancients had common sense; that the
classics contained everything that was either necessary, useful, or
ornamental to men; and I was not without thoughts of wearing the
'toga virilis' of the Romans, instead of the vulgar and illiberal
dress of the moderns. With these excellent notions I went first to
The Hague, where, by the help of several letters of recommendation,
I was soon introduced into all the best company; and where I very
soon discovered that I was totally mistaken in almost every one
notion I had entertained. Fortunately, I had a strong desire to
please (the mixed result of good-nature and a vanity by no means
blamable), and was sensible that I had nothing but the desire. I
therefore resolved, if possible, to acquire the means, too. I
studied attentively and minutely the dress, the air, the manner,
the address, and the turn of conversation of all those whom I found
to be the people in fashion, and most generally allowed to please.
I imitated them as well as I could; if I heard that one man was
reckoned remarkably genteel, I carefully watched his dress, motions
and attitudes, and formed my own upon them. When I heard of
another, whose conversation was agreeable and engaging, I listened
and attended to the turn of it. I addressed myself, though 'de tres
mauvaise grace', to all the most fashionable fine ladies;
confessed, and laughed with them at my own awkwardness and rawness,
recommending myself as an object for them to try their skill in
forming. By these means, and with a passionate desire of pleasing
everybody, I came by degrees to please some; and, I can assure you,
that what little figure I have made in the world, has been much
more owing to that passionate desire of pleasing universally than
to any intrinsic merit or sound knowledge I might ever have been
master of. My passion for pleasing was so strong (and I am very
glad it was so), that I own to you fairly, I wished to make every
woman I saw in love with me, and every man I met with admire me.
Without this passion for the object, I should never have been so
attentive to the means; and I own I cannot conceive how it is
possible for any man of good-nature and good sense to be without
this passion. Does not good-nature incline us to please all those
we converse with, of whatever rank or station they may be? And does
not good sense and common observation, show of what infinite use it
is to please? Oh! but one may please by the good qualities of the
heart, and the knowledge of the head, without that fashionable air,
address and manner, which is mere tinsel. I deny it. A man may be
esteemed and respected, but I defy him to please without them.
Moreover, at your age, I would not have contented myself with
barely pleasing; I wanted to shine and to distinguish myself in the
world as a man of fashion and gallantry, as well as business. And
that ambition or vanity, call it what you please, was a right one;
it hurt nobody, and made me exert whatever talents I had. It is the
spring of a thousand right and good things.
I was talking you over the other day with
one very much your friend, and who had often been with you, both at
Paris and in Italy. Among the innumerable questions which you may
be sure I asked him concerning you, I happened to mention your
dress (for, to say the truth, it was the only thing of which I
thought him a competent judge) upon which he said that you dressed
tolerably well at Paris; but that in Italy you dressed so ill, that
he used to joke with you upon it, and even to tear your clothes.
Now, I must tell you, that at your age it is as ridiculous not to
be very well dressed, as at my age it would be if I were to wear a
white feather and red-heeled shoes. Dress is one of various
ingredients that contribute to the art of pleasing; it pleases the
eyes at least, and more especially of women. Address yourself to
the senses, if you would please; dazzle the eyes, soothe and
flatter the ears of mankind; engage their hearts, and let their
reason do its worst against you. 'Suaviter in modo' is the great
secret. Whenever you find yourself engaged insensibly, in favor of
anybody of no superior merit nor distinguished talents, examine,
and see what it is that has made those impressions upon you: and
you will find it to be that 'douceur', that gentleness of manners,
that air and address, which I have so often recommended to you; and
from thence draw this obvious conclusion, that what pleases you in
them, will please others in you; for we are all made of the same
clay, though some of the lumps are a little finer, and some a
little coarser; but in general, the surest way to judge of others,
is to examine and analyze one's self thoroughly. When we meet I
will assist you in that analysis, in which every man wants some
assistance against his own self-love. Adieu.
LETTER
CL
GREENWICH, June 30,
O. S. 1751.
MY DEAR FRIEND: Pray give the inclosed to
our friend the Abbe; it is to congratulate him upon his
'Canonicat', which I am really very glad of, and I hope it will
fatten him up to Boileau's 'Chanoine'; at present he is as meagre
as an apostle or a prophet. By the way, has he ever introduced you
to la Duchesse d'Aiguillon? If he has not, make him present you;
and if he has, frequent her, and make her many compliments from me.
She has uncommon, sense and knowledge for a woman, and her house is
the resort of one set of 'les beaux esprits. It is a satisfaction
and a sort of credit to be acquainted with those gentlemen; and it
puts a young fellow in fashion. 'A propos des beaux esprits', you
have 'les entries' at Lady Sandwich's; who, old as she was, when I
saw her last, had the strongest parts of any woman I ever knew in
my life? If you are not acquainted with her, either the Duchesse
d'Aiguillon or Lady Hervey can, and I dare say will; introduce you.
I can assure you, it is very well worth your while, both upon her
own account, and for the sake of the people of wit and learning who
frequent her. In such companies there is always something to be
learned as well as manners; the conversation turns upon something
above trifles; some point of literature, criticism, history, etc.,
is discussed with ingenuity and good manners; for I must do the
French people of learning justice; they are not bears, as most of
ours are: they are gentlemen.
Our Abbe writes me word that you were gone
to Compiegne: I am very glad of it; other courts must form you for
your own. He tells me too, that you have left off riding at the
'manege'; I have no objection to that, it takes up a great deal of
the morning; and if you have got a genteel and firm seat on
horseback, it is enough for you, now that tilts and tournaments are
laid aside. I suppose you have hunted at Compiegne. The King's
hunting there, I am told, is a fine sight. The French manner of
hunting is gentlemanlike; ours is only for bumpkins and boobies.
The poor beasts are here pursued and run down by much greater
beasts than themselves, and the true British fox-hunter is most
undoubtedly a species appropriated and peculiar to this country,
which no other part of the globe produces.
I hope you apply the time you have saved
from the riding-house to useful more than to learned purposes; for
I can assure you they are very different things. I would have you
allow but one hour a-day for Greek; and that more to keep what you
have than to increase it: by Greek, I mean useful Greek books, such
as Demosthenes, Thucydides, etc., and not the poets, with whom you
are already enough acquainted. Your Latin will take care of itself.
Whatever more time you may have for reading, pray bestow it upon
those books which are immediately relative to your destination;
such as modern history, in the modern languages, memoirs,
anecdotes, letters, negotiations, etc. Collect also, if you can,
authentically, the present state of all the courts and countries in
Europe, the characters of the kings and princes, their wives, their
ministers, and their w--s; their several views, connections, and
interests; the state of their FINANCES, their military force, their
trade, manufactures, and commerce. That is the useful, the
necessary knowledge for you, and indeed for every gentleman. But
with all this, remember, that living books are much better than
dead ones; and throw away no time (for it is thrown away) with the
latter, which you can employ well with the former; for books must
now be your only amusement, but, by no means your business. I had
much rather that you were passionately in love with some determined
coquette of condition (who would lead you a dance, fashion, supple,
and polish you), than that you knew all Plato and Aristotle by
heart: an hour at Versailles, Compiegne, or St. Cloud, is now worth
more to you than three hours in your closet, with the best books
that ever were written.
I hear the dispute between the court and the
clergy is made up amicably, both parties have yielded something;
the king being afraid of losing more of his soul, and the clergy
more of their revenue. Those gentlemen are very skillful in making
the most of the vices and the weaknesses of the laity. I hope you
have read and informed yourself fully of everything relative to
that affair; it is a very important question, in which the
priesthood of every country in Europe is highly concerned. If you
would be thoroughly convinced that their tithes are of divine
institution, and their property the property of God himself, not to
be touched by any power on earth, read Fra Paolo De Beneficiis, an
excellent and short book; for which, and some other treaties
against the court of Rome, he was stilettoed; which made him say
afterward, upon seeing an anonymous book written against him by
order of the Pope, 'Conosco bene to stile Romano'.
The parliament of Paris, and the states of
Languedoc, will, I believe, hardly scramble off; having only reason
and justice, but no terrors on their side. Those are political and
constitutional questions that well deserve your attention and
inquiries. I hope you are thoroughly master of them. It is also
worth your while to collect and keep all the pieces written upon
those subjects.
I hope you have been thanked by your ladies,
at least, if not paid in money, for the mohairs, which I sent by a
courier to Paris, some time ago, instead of sending them to Madame
Morel, at Calais, as I told you I should. Do they like them; and do
they like you the better for getting them? 'Le petite Blot devroit
au moins payer de sa personne'. As for Madame de Polignac, I
believe you will very willingly hold her excused from personal
payment.
Before you return to England, pray go again
to Orli, for two or three days, and also to St. Cloud, in order to
secure a good reception there at your return. Ask the Marquis de
Matignon too, if he has any orders for you in England, or any
letters or packets for Lord Bolingbroke. Adieu! Go on and
prosper.
LETTER
CLI
GREENWICH, July 8,
O. S. 1751.
MY DEAR FRIEND: The last mail brought me
your letter of the 3d July, N. S. I am glad that you are so well
with Colonel Yorke, as to be let into secret correspondences. Lord
Albemarle's reserve to you is, I believe, more owing to his
secretary than to himself; for you seem to be much in favor with
him; and possibly too HE HAS NO VERY SECRET LETTERS to communicate.
However, take care not to discover the least dissatisfaction upon
this score: make the proper acknowledgments to Colonel Yorke, for
what he does show you; but let neither Lord Albemarle nor his
people perceive the least coldness on your part, upon account of
what they do not show you. It is very often necessary, not to
manifest all one feels. Make your court to, and connect yourself as
much as possible with Colonel Yorke; he may be of great use to you
hereafter; and when you take leave, not only offer to bring over
any letters or packets, by way of security; but even ask, as a
favor, to be the carrier of a letter from him to his father, the
Chancellor. 'A propos' of your coming here; I confess that I am
weakly impatient for it, and think a few days worth getting; I
would, therefore, instead of the 25th of next month, N. S., which
was the day that I some time ago appointed for your leaving Paris,
have you set out on Friday the 20th of August, N. S.; in
consequence of which you will be at Calais some time on the Sunday
following, and probably at Dover within four-and-twenty hours
afterward. If you land in the morning, you may, in a postchaise,
get to Sittingborne that day; if you come on shore in the evening,
you can only get to Canterbury, where you will be better lodged
than at Dover. I will not have you travel in the night, nor fatigue
and overheat yourself by running on fourscore miles the moment you
land. You will come straight to Blackheath, where I shall be ready
to meet you, and which is directly upon the Dover road to London;
and we will go to town together, after you have rested yourself a
day or two here. All the other directions, which I gave you in my
former letter, hold still the same. But, notwithstanding this
regulation, should you have any particular reasons for leaving
Paris two or three days sooner or later, than the above mentioned,
'vous etes maitre'. Make all your arrangements at Paris for about a
six weeks stay in England at farthest.
I had a letter the other day from Lord
Huntingdon, of which one-half at least was your panegyric; it was
extremely welcome to me from so good a hand. Cultivate that
friendship; it will do you honor and give you strength.
Connections, in our mixed parliamentary government, are of great
use.
I send you here inclosed the particular
price of each of the mohairs; but I do not suppose that you will
receive a shilling for anyone of them. However, if any of your
ladies should take an odd fancy to pay, the shortest way, in the
course of business, is for you to keep the money, and to take so
much less from Sir John Lambert in your next draught upon
him.
I am very sorry to hear that Lady Hervey is
ill. Paris does not seem to agree with her; she used to have great
health here. 'A propos' of her; remember, when you are with me, not
to mention her but when you and I are quite alone, for reasons
which I will tell you when we meet: but this is only between you
and me; and I desire that you will not so much as hint it to her,
or to anybody else.
If old Kurzay goes to the valley of
Jehoshaphat, I cannot help it; it will be an ease to our friend
Madame Montconseil, who I believe maintains her, and a little will
not satisfy her in any way.
Remember to bring your mother some little
presents; they need not be of value, but only marks of your
affection and duty for one who has always been tenderly fond of
you. You may bring Lady Chesterfield a little Martin snuffbox of
about five Louis; and you need bring over no other presents; you
and I not wanting 'les petits presens pour entretenir
l'amitee'.
Since I wrote what goes before, I have
talked you over minutely with Lord Albemarle, who told me, that he
could very sincerely commend you upon every article but one; but
upon that one you were often joked, both by him and others. I
desired to know what that was; he laughed and told me it was the
article of dress, in which you were exceedingly negligent. Though
he laughed, I can assure you that it is no laughing matter for you;
and you will possibly be surprised when I assert (but, upon my
word, it is literally true), that to be very well dressed is of
much more importance to you, than all the Greek you know will, be
of these thirty years. Remember that the world is now your only
business; and that you must adopt its customs and manners, be they
silly or be they not. To neglect your dress, is an affront to all
the women you keep company with; as it implies that you do not
think them worth that attention which everybody else doth; they
mind dress, and you will never please them if you neglect yours;
and if you do not please the women, you will not please half the
men you otherwise might. It is the women who put a young fellow in
fashion even with the men. A young fellow ought to have a certain
fund of coquetry; which should make him try all the means of
pleasing, as much as any coquette in Europe can do. Old as I am,
and little thinking of women, God knows, I am very far from being
negligent of my dress; and why? From conformity to custom, and out
of decency to men, who expect that degree of complaisance. I do
not, indeed, wear feathers and red heels, which would ill suit my
age; but I take care to have my clothes well made, my wig well
combed and powdered, my linen and person extremely clean. I even
allow my footman forty shillings a year extraordinary, that they
may be spruce and neat. Your figure especially, which from its
stature cannot be very majestic and interesting, should be the more
attended to in point of dress as it cannot be 'imposante', it
should be 'gentile, aimable, bien mise'. It will not admit of
negligence and carelessness.
I believe Mr. Hayes thinks that you have
slighted him a little of late, since you have got into so much
other company. I do not by any means blame you for not frequenting
his house so much as you did at first, before you had got into so
many other houses more entertaining and more instructing than his;
on the contrary, you do very well; but, however, as he was
extremely civil to you, take care to be so to him, and make up in
manner what you omit in matter. See him, dine with him before you
come away, and ask his commands for England.
Your triangular seal is done, and I have
given it to an English gentleman, who sets out in a week for Paris,
and who will deliver it to Sir John Lambert for you.
I cannot conclude this letter without
returning again to the showish, the ornamental, the shining parts
of your character; which, if you neglect, upon my word you will
render the solid ones absolutely useless; nay, such is the present
turn of the world, that some valuable qualities are even
ridiculous, if not accompanied by the genteeler accomplishments.
Plainness, simplicity, and quakerism, either in dress or manners,
will by no means do; they must both be laced and embroidered;
speaking, or writing sense, without elegance and turn, will be very
little persuasive; and the best figure in the world, without air
and address, will be very ineffectual. Some pedants may have told
you that sound sense and learning stand in, need of no ornaments;
and, to support that assertion, elegantly quote the vulgar proverb,
that GOOD WINE NEEDS NO BUSH; but surely the little experience you
have already had of the world must have convinced you that the
contrary of that assertion is true. All those accomplishments are
now in your power; think of them, and of them only. I hope you
frequent La Foire St. Laurent, which I see is now open; you will
improve more by going there with your mistress, than by staying at
home and reading Euclid with your geometry master. Adieu.
'Divertissez-vous, il n'y a rien de tel'.
LETTER
CLII
GREENWICH, July 15,
O. S. 1751
MY DEAR FRIEND: As this is the last, or last
letter but one, that I think I shall write before I have the
pleasure of seeing you here, it may not be amiss to prepare you a
little for our interview, and for the time we shall pass together.
Before kings and princes meet, ministers on each side adjust the
important points of precedence, arm chairs, right hand and left,
etc., so that they know previously what they are to expect, what
they have to trust to; and it is right they should; for they
commonly envy or hate, but most certainly distrust each other. We
shall meet upon very different terms; we want no such
preliminaries: you know my tenderness, I know your affection. My
only object, therefore, is to make your short stay with me as
useful as I can to you; and yours, I hope, is to co-operate with
me. Whether, by making it wholesome, I shall make it pleasant to
you, I am not sure. Emetics and cathartics I shall not administer,
because I am sure you do not want them; but for alteratives you
must expect a great many; and I can tell you that I have a number
of NOSTRUMS, which I shall communicate to nobody but yourself. To
speak without a metaphor, I shall endeavor to assist your youth
with all the experience that I have purchased, at the price of
seven and fifty years. In order to this, frequent reproofs,
corrections, and admonitions will be necessary; but then, I promise
you, that they shall be in a gentle, friendly, and secret manner;
they shall not put you out of countenance in company, nor out of
humor when we are alone. I do not expect that, at nineteen, you
should have that knowledge of the world, those manners, that
dexterity, which few people have at nine-and-twenty. But I will
endeavor to give them you; and I am sure you will endeavor to learn
them, as far as your youth, my experience, and the time we shall
pass together, will allow. You may have many inaccuracies (and to
be sure you have, for who has not at your age?) which few people
will tell you of, and some nobody can tell you of but myself. You
may possibly have others, too, which eyes less interested, and less
vigilant than mine, do not discover; all those you shall hear of
from one whose tenderness for you will excite his curiosity and
sharpen his penetration. The smallest inattention or error in
manners, the minutest inelegance of diction, the least awkwardness
in your dress and carriage, will not escape my observation, nor
pass without amicable correction. Two, the most intimate friends in
the world, can freely tell each other their faults, and even their
crimes, but cannot possibly tell each other of certain little
weaknesses; awkwardnesses, and blindnesses of self-love; to
authorize that unreserved freedom, the relation between us is
absolutely necessary. For example, I had a very worthy friend, with
whom I was intimate enough to tell him his faults; he had but few;
I told him of them; he took it kindly of me, and corrected them.
But then, he had some weaknesses that I could never tell him of
directly, and which he was so little sensible of himself, that
hints of them were lost upon him. He had a scrag neck, of about a
yard long; notwithstanding which, bags being in fashion, truly he
would wear one to his wig, and did so; but never behind him, for,
upon every motion of his head, his bag came forward over one
shoulder or the other. He took it into his head too, that he must
occasionally dance minuets, because other people did; and he did
so, not only extremely ill, but so awkward, so disjointed, slim, so
meagre, was his figure, that had he danced as well as ever Marcel
did, it would have been ridiculous in him to have danced at all. I
hinted these things to him as plainly as friendship would allow,
and to no purpose; but to have told him the whole, so as to cure
him, I must have been his father, which, thank God, I am not. As
fathers commonly go, it is seldom a misfortune to be fatherless;
and, considering the general run of sons, as seldom a misfortune to
be childless. You and I form, I believe, an exception to that rule;
for, I am persuaded that we would neither of us change our
relation, were it in our power. You will, I both hope and believe,
be not only the comfort, but the pride of my age; and, I am sure, I
will be the support, the friend, the guide of your youth. Trust me
without reserve; I will advise you without private interest, or
secret envy. Mr. Harte will do so too; but still there may be some
little things proper for you to know, and necessary for you to
correct, which even his friendship would not let him tell you of so
freely as I should; and some, of which he may not possibly be so
good a judge of as I am, not having lived so much in the great
world.
One principal topic of our conversation will
be, not only the purity but the elegance of the English language;
in both which you are very deficient. Another will be the
constitution of this country, of which, I believe, you know less
than of most other countries in Europe. Manners, attentions, and
address, will also be the frequent subjects of our lectures; and
whatever I know of that important and necessary art, the art of
pleasing. I will unreservedly communicate to you. Dress too (which,
as things are, I can logically prove, requires some attention) will
not always escape our notice. Thus, my lectures will be more
various, and in some respects more useful than Professor Mascow's,
and therefore, I can tell you, that I expect to be paid for them;
but, as possibly you would not care to part with your ready money,
and as I do not think that it would be quite handsome in me to
accept it, I will compound for the payment, and take it in
attention and practice.
Pray remember to part with all your friends,
acquaintances, and mistresses, if you have any at Paris, in such a
manner as may make them not only willing but impatient to see you
there again. Assure them of your desire of returning to them; and
do it in a manner that they may think you in earnest, that is 'avec
onction et une espece d'attendrissement'. All people say, pretty
near the same things upon those occasions; it is the manner only
that makes the difference; and that difference is great. Avoid,
however, as much as you can, charging yourself with commissions, in
your return from hence to Paris; I know, by experience, that they
are exceedingly troublesome, commonly expensive, and very seldom
satisfactory at last, to the persons who gave them; some you cannot
refuse, to people to whom you are obliged, and would oblige in your
turn; but as to common fiddle-faddle commissions, you may excuse
yourself from them with truth, by saying that you are to return to
Paris through Flanders, and see all those great towns; which I
intend you shall do, and stay a week or ten days at Brussels.
Adieu! A good journey to you, if this is my last; if not, I can
repeat again what I shall wish constantly.
LETTER
CLIII
LONDON, December 19, O. S. 1751-[Note the
date, which indicates that the sojourn with the author has
ended.]
MY DEAR FRIEND: You are now entered upon a
scene of business, where I hope you will one day make a figure. Use
does a great deal, but care and attention must be joined to it. The
first thing necessary in writing letters of business, is extreme
clearness and perspicuity; every paragraph should be so clear and
unambiguous, that the dullest fellow in the world may not be able
to mistake it, nor obliged to read it twice in order to understand
it. This necessary clearness implies a correctness, without
excluding an elegance of style. Tropes, figures, antitheses,
epigrams, etc., would be as misplaced and as impertinent in letters
of business, as they are sometimes (if judiciously used) proper and
pleasing in familiar letters, upon common and trite subjects. In
business, an elegant simplicity, the result of care, not of labor,
is required. Business must be well, not affectedly dressed; but by
no means negligently. Let your first attention be to clearness, and
read every paragraph after you have written it, in the critical
view of discovering whether it is possible that any one man can
mistake the true sense of it: and correct it accordingly.
Our pronouns and relatives often create
obscurity or ambiguity; be therefore exceedingly attentive to them,
and take care to mark out with precision their particular
relations. For example, Mr. Johnson acquainted me that he had seen
Mr. Smith, who had promised him to speak to Mr. Clarke, to return
him (Mr. Johnson) those papers, which he (Mr. Smith) had left some
time ago with him (Mr. Clarke): it is better to repeat a name,
though unnecessarily, ten times, than to have the person mistaken
once. WHO, you know, is singly relative to persons, and cannot be
applied to things; WHICH and THAT are chiefly relative to things,
but not absolutely exclusive of persons; for one may say, the man
THAT robbed or killed such-a-one; but it is better to say, the man
WHO robbed or killed. One never says, the man or the woman WHICH.
WHICH and THAT, though chiefly relative to things, cannot be always
used indifferently as to things, and the 'euoovca' must sometimes
determine their place. For instance, the letter WHICH I received
from you, WHICH you referred to in your last, WHICH came by Lord
Albemarle's messenger WHICH I showed to such-a-one; I would change
it thus-The letter THAT I received from you; WHICH you referred to
in your last, THAT came by Lord Albemarle's messenger, and WHICH I
showed to such-a-one.
Business does not exclude (as possibly you
wish it did) the usual terms of politeness and good-breeding; but,
on the contrary, strictly requires them: such as, I HAVE THE HONOR
TO ACQUAINT YOUR LORDSHIP; PERMIT ME TO ASSURE YOU; IF I MAY BE
ALLOWED TO GIVE MY OPINION, etc. For the minister abroad, who
writes to the minister at home, writes to his superior; possibly to
his patron, or at least to one who he desires should be so.
Letters of business will not only admit of,
but be the better for CERTAIN GRACES-but then, they must be
scattered with a sparing and skillful hand; they must fit their
place exactly. They must decently adorn without encumbering, and
modestly shine without glaring. But as this is the utmost degree of
perfection in letters of business, I would not advise you to
attempt those embellishments, till you have first laid your
foundation well.
Cardinal d'Ossat's letters are the true
letters of business; those of Monsieur d'Avaux are excellent; Sir
William Temple's are very pleasing, but, I fear, too affected.
Carefully avoid all Greek or Latin quotations; and bring no
precedents from the VIRTUOUS SPARTANS, THE POLITE ATHENIANS, AND
THE BRAVE ROMANS. Leave all that to futile pedants. No flourishes,
no declamation. But (I repeat it again) there is an elegant
simplicity and dignity of style absolutely necessary for good
letters of business; attend to that carefully. Let your periods be
harmonious, without seeming to be labored; and let them not be too
long, for that always occasions a degree of obscurity. I should not
mention correct orthography, but that you very often fail in that
particular, which will bring ridicule upon you; for no man is
allowed to spell ill. I wish too that your handwriting were much
better; and I cannot conceive why it is not, since every man may
certainly write whatever hand he pleases. Neatness in folding up,
sealing, and directing your packets, is by no means to be
neglected; though, I dare say, you think it is. But there is
something in the exterior, even of a packet, that may please or
displease; and consequently worth some attention.
You say that your time is very well
employed; and so it is, though as yet only in the outlines, and
first ROUTINE of business. They are previously necessary to be
known; they smooth the way for parts and dexterity. Business
requires no conjuration nor supernatural talents, as people
unacquainted with it are apt to think. Method, diligence, and
discretion, will carry a man, of good strong common sense, much
higher than the finest parts, without them, can do. 'Par negotiis,
neque supra', is the true character of a man of business; but then
it implies ready attention and no ABSENCES, and a flexibility and
versatility of attention from one object to another, without being
engrossed by anyone.
Be upon your guard against the pedantry and
affectation of business which young people are apt to fall into,
from the pride of being concerned in it young. They look
thoughtful, complain of the weight of business, throw out
mysterious hints, and seem big with secrets which they do not know.
Do you, on the contrary, never talk of business but to those with
whom you are to transact it; and learn to seem vacuus and idle,
when you have the most business. Of all things, the 'volte
sciollo', and the 'pensieri stretti', are necessary. Adieu.
LETTER
CLIV
LONDON, December
30, O. S. 1751
MY DEAR FRIEND: The parliaments are the
courts of justice of France, and are what our courts of justice in
Westminster-Hall are here. They used anciently to follow the court,
and administer justice in presence of the King. Philip le Bel first
fixed it at Paris, by an edict of 1302. It consisted then of but
one chambre, which was called 'la Chambre des Prelats', most of the
members being ecclesiastics; but the multiplicity of business made
it by degrees necessary to create several other chambres. It
consists now of seven chambres:
'La Grande Chambre', which is the highest
court of justice, and to which appeals lie from the others.
'Les cinq Chambres des Enquetes', which are
like our Common Pleas, and Court of Exchequer.
'La Tournelle', which is the court for
criminal justice, and answers to our Old Bailey and King's
Bench.
There are in all twelve parliaments in
France: 1. Paris 2. Toulouse 3. Grenoble 4. Bourdeaux 5. Dijon 6.
Rouen 7. Aix en Provence 8. Rennes en Bretagne 9. Pau en Navarre
10. Metz 11. Dole en Franche Comte 12. Douay
There are three 'Conseils Souverains', which
may almost be called parliaments; they are those of:
Perpignan Arras Alsace
For further particulars of the French
parliaments, read 'Bernard de la Rochefavin des Parlemens de
France', and other authors, who have treated that subject
constitutionally. But what will be still better, converse upon it
with people of sense and knowledge, who will inform you of the
particular objects of the several chambres, and the businesses of
the respective members, as, 'les Presidens, les Presidens a
Mortier' (these last so called from their black velvet caps laced
with gold), 'les Maitres tres des Requetes, les Greffiers, le
Procureur General, les Avocats Generaux, les Conseillers', etc. The
great point in dispute is concerning the powers of the parliament
of Paris in matters of state, and relatively to the Crown. They
pretend to the powers of the States-General of France when they
used to be assembled (which, I think, they have not been since the
reign of Lewis the Thirteenth, in the year 1615). The Crown denies
those pretensions, and considers them only as courts of justice.
Mezeray seems to be on the side of the parliament in this question,
which is very well worth your inquiry. But, be that as it will, the
parliament of Paris is certainly a very respectable body, and much
regarded by the whole kingdom. The edicts of the Crown, especially
those for levying money on the subjects, ought to be registered in
parliament; I do not say to have their effect, for the Crown would
take good care of that; but to have a decent appearance, and to
procure a willing acquiescence in the nation. And the Crown itself,
absolute as it is, does not love that strong opposition, and those
admirable remonstrances, which it sometimes meets with from the
parliaments. Many of those detached pieces are very well worth your
collecting; and I remember, a year or two ago, a remonstrance of
the parliament of Douay, upon the subject, as I think, of the
'Vingtieme', which was in my mind one of the finest and most moving
compositions I ever read. They owned themselves, indeed, to be
slaves, and showed their chains: but humbly begged of his Majesty
to make them a little lighter, and less galling.
THE STATES OF FRANCE were general assemblies
of the three states or orders of the kingdom; the Clergy, the
Nobility, and the 'Tiers Etat', that is, the people. They used to
be called together by the King, upon the most important affairs of
state, like our Lords and Commons in parliament, and our Clergy in
convocation. Our parliament is our states, and the French
parliaments are only their courts of justice. The Nobility
consisted of all those of noble extraction, whether belonging to
the SWORD or to the ROBE, excepting such as were chosen (which
sometimes happened) by the Tiers Etat as their deputies to the
States-General. The Tiers Etat was exactly our House of Commons,
that is, the people, represented by deputies of their own choosing.
Those who had the most considerable places, 'dans la robe',
assisted at those assemblies, as commissioners on the part of the
Crown. The States met, for the first time that I can find (I mean
by the name of 'les etats'), in the reign of Pharamond, 424, when
they confirmed the Salic law. From that time they have been very
frequently assembled, sometimes upon important occasions, as making
war and peace, reforming abuses, etc.; at other times, upon
seemingly trifling ones, as coronations, marriages, etc. Francis
the First assembled them, in 1526, to declare null and void his
famous treaty of Madrid, signed and sworn to by him during his
captivity there. They grew troublesome to the kings and to their
ministers, and were but seldom called after the power of the Crown
grew strong; and they have never been heard of since the year 1615.
Richelieu came and shackled the nation, and Mazarin and Lewis the
Fourteenth riveted the shackles.
There still subsist in some provinces in
France, which are called 'pais d etats', an humble local imitation,
or rather mimicry, of the great 'etats', as in Languedoc, Bretagne,
etc. They meet, they speak, they grumble, and finally submit to
whatever the King orders.
Independently of the intrinsic utility of
this kind of knowledge to every man of business, it is a shame for
any man to be ignorant of it, especially relatively to any country
he has been long in. Adieu.
1752
LETTER CLV
LONDON, January 2, O. S. 1752.
MY DEAR FRIEND: Laziness of mind, or
inattention, are as great enemies to knowledge as incapacity; for,
in truth, what difference is there between a man who will not, and
a man who cannot be informed? This difference only, that the former
is justly to be blamed, the latter to be pitied. And yet how many
there are, very capable of receiving knowledge, who from laziness,
inattention, and incuriousness, will not so much as ask for it,
much less take the least pains to acquire it!
Our young English travelers generally
distinguish themselves by a voluntary privation of all that useful
knowledge for which they are sent abroad; and yet, at that age, the
most useful knowledge is the most easy to be acquired; conversation
being the book, and the best book in which it is contained. The
drudgery of dry grammatical learning is over, and the fruits of it
are mixed with, and adorned by, the flowers of conversation. How
many of our young men have been a year at Rome, and as long at
Paris, without knowing the meaning and institution of the Conclave
in the former, and of the parliament in the latter? and this merely
for want of asking the first people they met with in those several
places, who could at least have given them some general notions of
those matters.
You will, I hope, be wiser, and omit no
opportunity (for opportunities present themselves every hour of the
day) of acquainting yourself with all those political and
constitutional particulars of the kingdom and government of France.
For instance, when you hear people mention le Chancelier, or 'le
Garde de Sceaux', is it any great trouble for you to ask, or for
others to tell you, what is the nature, the powers, the objects,
and the profits of those two employments, either when joined
together, as they often are, or when separate, as they are at
present? When you hear of a gouverneur, a lieutenant du Roi, a
commandant, and an intendant of the same province, is, it not
natural, is it not becoming, is it not necessary, for a stranger to
inquire into their respective rights and privileges? And yet, I
dare say, there are very few Englishmen who know the difference
between the civil department of the Intendant, and the military
powers of the others. When you hear (as I am persuaded you must)
every day of the 'Vingtieme', which is one in twenty, and
consequently five per cent., inquire upon what that tax is laid,
whether upon lands, money, merchandise, or upon all three; how
levied, and what it is supposed to produce. When you find in books:
(as you will sometimes) allusion to particular laws and customs, do
not rest till you have traced them up to their source. To give you
two examples: you will meet in some French comedies, 'Cri', or
'Clameur de Haro'; ask what it means, and you will be told that it
is a term of the law in Normandy, and means citing, arresting, or
obliging any person to appear in the courts of justice, either upon
a civil or a criminal account; and that it is derived from 'a
Raoul', which Raoul was anciently Duke of Normandy, and a prince
eminent for his justice; insomuch, that when any injustice was
committed, the cry immediately was, 'Venez, a Raoul, a Raoul',
which words are now corrupted and jumbled into 'haro'. Another, 'Le
vol du Chapon, that is, a certain district of ground immediately
contiguous to the mansion-seat of a family, and answers to what we
call in English DEMESNES. It is in France computed at about 1,600
feet round the house, that being supposed to be the extent of the
capon's flight from 'la basse cour'. This little district must go
along with the mansion-seat, however the rest of the estate may be
divided.
I do not mean that you should be a French
lawyer; but I would not have you unacquainted with the general
principles of their law, in matters that occur every day: Such is
the nature of their descents, that is, the inheritance of lands: Do
they all go to the eldest son, or are they equally divided among
the children of the deceased? In England, all lands unsettled
descend to the eldest son, as heir-at-law, unless otherwise
disposed of by the father's will, except in the county of Kent,
where a particular custom prevails, called Gavelkind; by which, if
the father dies intestate, all his children divide his lands
equally among them. In Germany, as you know, all lands that, are
not fiefs are equally divided among all the children, which ruins
those families; but all male fiefs of the empire descend
unalienably to the next male heir, which preserves those families.
In France, I believe, descents vary in different provinces.
The nature of marriage contracts deserves
inquiry. In England, the general practice is, the husband takes all
the wife's fortune; and in consideration of it settles upon her a
proper pin-money, as it is called; that is, an annuity during his
life, and a jointure after his death. In France it is not so,
particularly at Paris; where 'la communaute des biens' is
established. Any married woman at Paris (IF YOU ARE ACQUAINTED WITH
ONE) can inform you of all these particulars.
These and other things of the same nature,
are the useful and rational objects of the curiosity of a man of
sense and business. Could they only be attained by laborious
researches in folio-books, and wormeaten manuscripts, I should not
wonder at a young fellow's being ignorant of them; but as they are
the frequent topics of conversation, and to be known by a very
little degree of curiosity, inquiry and attention, it is
unpardonable not to know them.
Thus I have given you some hints only for
your inquiries; 'l'Etat de la France, l'Almanach Royal', and twenty
other such superficial books, will furnish you with a thousand
more. 'Approfondissez.'
How often, and how justly, have I since
regretted negligences of this kind in my youth! And how often have
I since been at great trouble to learn many things which I could
then have learned without any! Save yourself now, then, I beg of
you, that regret and trouble hereafter. Ask questions, and many
questions; and leave nothing till you are thoroughly informed of
it. Such pertinent questions are far from being illbred or
troublesome to those of whom you ask them; on the contrary, they
are a tacit compliment to their knowledge; and people have a better
opinion of a young man, when they see him desirous to be
informed.
I have by last post received your two
letters of the 1st and 5th of January, N. S. I am very glad that
you have been at all the shows at Versailles: frequent the courts.
I can conceive the murmurs of the French at the poorness of the
fireworks, by which they thought their king of their country
degraded; and, in truth, were things always as they should be, when
kings give shows they ought to be magnificent.
I thank you for the 'These de la Sorbonne',
which you intend to send me, and which I am impatient to receive.
But pray read it carefully yourself first; and inform yourself what
the Sorbonne is by whom founded, and for what puraoses.
Since you have time, you have done very well
to take an Italian and a German master; but pray take care to leave
yourelf time enough for company; for it is in company only that you
can learn what will be much more useful to you than either Italian
or German; I mean 'la politesse, les manieres et les graces,
without which, as I told you long ago, and I told you true, 'ogni
fatica a vana'. Adieu.
Pray make my compliments to Lady
Brown.
LETTER
CLVI
LONDON, January 6, O. S. 1752. MY DEAR
FRIEND
I recommended to you, in my last, some
inquiries into the constitution of that famous society the
Sorbonne; but as I cannot wholly trust to the diligence of those
inquiries, I will give you here the outlines of that establishment;
which may possibly excite you to inform yourself of particulars,
which you are more 'a portee' to know than I am.
It was founded by Robert de Sorbon, in the
year 1256 for sixteen poor scholars in divinity; four of each
nation, of the university of which it made a part; since that it
hath been much extended and enriched, especially by the liberality
and pride of Cardinal Richelieu; who made it a magnificent building
for six-and-thirty doctors of that society to live in; besides
which, there are six professors and schools for divinity. This
society has long been famous for theological knowledge and
exercitations. There unintelligible points are debated with
passion, though they can never be determined by reason. Logical
subtilties set common sense at defiance; and mystical refinements
disfigure and disguise the native beauty and simplicity of true
natural religion; wild imaginations form systems, which weak minds
adopt implicitly, and which sense and reason oppose in vain; their
voice is not strong enough to be heard in schools of divinity.
Political views are by no means neglected in those sacred places;
and questions are agitated and decided, according to the degree of
regard, or rather submission, which the Sovereign is pleased to
show the Church. Is the King a slave to the Church, though a tyrant
to the laity? The least resistance to his will shall be declared
damnable. But if he will not acknowledge the superiority of their
spiritual over his temporal, nor even admit their 'imperium in
imperio', which is the least they will compound for, it becomes
meritorious not only to resist, but to depose him. And I suppose
that the bold propositions in the thesis you mention, are a return
for the valuation of 'les biens du Clerge'.
I would advise you, by all means, to attend
to two or three of their public disputations, in order to be
informed both of the manner and the substance of those scholastic
exercises. Pray remember to go to all those kind of things. Do not
put it off, as one is too apt to do those things which one knows
can be done every day, or any day; for one afterward repents
extremely, when too late, the not having done them.
But there is another (so-called) religious
society, of which the minutest circumstance deserves attention, and
furnishes great matter for useful reflections. You easily guess
that I mean the society of 'les R. R. P. P. Jesuites', established
but in the year 1540, by a Bull of Pope Paul III. Its progress, and
I may say its victories, were more rapid than those of the Romans;
for within the same century it governed all Europe; and, in the
next, it extended its influence over the whole world. Its founder
was an abandoned profligate Spanish officer, Ignatius Loyola; who,
in the year 1521, being wounded in the leg at the 'siege of
Pampeluna, went mad from the smart of his wound, the reproaches of
his conscience, and his confinement, during which he read the lives
of the Saints. Consciousness of guilt, a fiery temper, and a wild
imagination, the common ingredients of enthusiasm, made this madman
devote himself to the particular service of the Virgin Mary; whose
knight-errant he declared himself, in the very same form in which
the old knight-errants in romances used to declare themselves the
knights and champions of certain beautiful and incomparable
princesses, whom sometimes they had, but oftener had not, seen. For
Dulcinea del Toboso was by no means the first princess whom her
faithful and valorous knight had never seen in his life. The
enthusiast went to the Holy Land, from whence he returned to Spain,
where he began to learn Latin and philosophy at three-and-thirty
years old, so that no doubt but he made great progress in both. The
better to carry on his mad and wicked designs, he chose four
disciples, or rather apostles, all Spaniards, viz, Laynes,
Salmeron, Bobadilla, and Rodriguez. He then composed the rules and
constitutions of his order; which, in the year 1547, was called the
order of Jesuits, from the church of Jesus in Rome, which was given
them. Ignatius died in 1556, aged sixty-five, thirty-five years
after his conversion, and sixteen years after the establishment of
his society. He was canonized in the year 1609, and is doubtless
now a saint in heaven.
If the religious and moral principles of
this society are to be detested, as they justly are, the wisdom of
their political principles is as justly to be admired. Suspected,
collectively as an order, of the greatest crimes, and convicted of
many, they have either escaped punishment, or triumphed after it;
as in France, in the reign of Henry IV. They have, directly or
indirectly, governed the consciences and the councils of all the
Catholic princes in Europe; they almost governed China in the reign
of Cangghi; and they are now actually in possession of the Paraguay
in America, pretending, but paying no obedience to the Crown of
Spain. As a collective body they are detested, even by all the
Catholics, not excepting the clergy, both secular and regular, and
yet, as individuals, they are loved, respected, and they govern
wherever they are.
Two things, I believe, contribute to their
success. The first, that passive, implicit, unlimited obedience to
their General (who always resides at Rome), and to the superiors of
their several houses, appointed by him. This obedience is observed
by them all to a most astonishing degree; and, I believe, there is
no one society in the world, of which so many individuals sacrifice
their private interest to the general one of the society itself.
The second is the education of youth, which they have in a manner
engrossed; there they give the first, and the first are the lasting
impressions; those impressions are always calculated to be
favorable to the society. I have known many Catholics, educated by
the Jesuits, who, though they detested the society, from reason and
knowledge, have always remained attached to it, from habit and
prejudice. The Jesuits know, better than any set of people in the
world, the importance of the art of pleasing, and study it more;
they become all things to all men in order to gain, not a few, but
many. In Asia, Africa, and America they become more than half
pagans, in order to convert the pagans to be less than half
Christians. In private families they begin by insinuating
themselves as friends, they grow to be favorites, and they end
DIRECTORS. Their manners are not like those of any other regulars
in the world, but gentle, polite, and engaging. They are all
carefully bred up to that particular destination, to which they
seem to have a natural turn; for which reason one sees most Jesuits
excel in some particular thing. They even breed up some for
martyrdom in case of need; as the superior of a Jesuit seminary at
Rome told Lord Bolingbroke. 'E abbiamo anche martiri per il
martirio, se bisogna'.
Inform yourself minutely of everything
concerning this extraordinary establishment; go into their houses,
get acquainted with individuals, hear some of them preach. The
finest preacher I ever heard in my life is le Pere Neufville, who,
I believe, preaches still at Paris, and is so much in the best
company, that you may easily get personally acquainted with
him.
If you would know their 'morale' read
Pascal's 'Lettres Provinciales', in which it is very truly
displayed from their own writings.
Upon the whole, this is certain, that a
society of which so little good is said, and so much ill believed,
and that still not only subsists, but flourishes, must be a very
able one. It is always mentioned as a proof of the superior
abilities of the Cardinal Richelieu, that, though hated by all the
nation, and still more by his master, he kept his power in spite of
both.
I would earnestly wish you to do everything
now, which I wish, that I had done at your age, and did not do.
Every country has its peculiarities, which one can be much better
informed of during one's residence there, than by reading all the
books in the world afterward. While you are in Catholic countries,
inform yourself of all the forms and ceremonies of that tawdry
church; see their converts both of men and women, know their
several rules and orders, attend their most remarkable ceremonies;
have their terms of art explained to you, their 'tierce, sexte,
nones, matines; vepres, complies'; their 'breviares, rosaires,
heures, chapelets, agnus', etc., things that many people talk of
from habit, though few people know the true meaning of anyone of
them. Converse with, and study the characters of some of those
incarcerated enthusiasts. Frequent some 'parloirs', and see the air
and manners of those Recluse, who are a distinct nation themselves,
and like no other.
I dined yesterday with Mrs. F--d, her mother
and husband. He is an athletic Hibernian, handsome in his person,
but excessively awkward and vulgar in his air and manner. She
inquired much after you, and, I thought, with interest. I answered
her as a 'Mezzano' should do: 'Et je pronai votre tendresse, vos
soins, et vos soupirs'.
When you meet with any British returning to
their own country, pray send me by them any little 'brochures,
factums, theses', etc., 'qui font du bruit ou du plaisir a Paris'.
Adieu, child.
LETTER
CLVII
LONDON, January 23,
O. S. 1752.
MY DEAR FRIEND: Have you seen the new
tragedy of Varon,-[Written by the Vicomte de Grave; and at that
time the general topic of conversation at Paris.]-and what do you
think of it? Let me know, for I am determined to form my taste upon
yours. I hear that the situations and incidents are well brought
on, and the catastrophe unexpected and surprising, but the verses
bad. I suppose it is the subject of all conversations at Paris,
where both women and men are judges and critics of all such
performances; such conversations, that both form and improve the
taste, and whet the judgment; are surely preferable to the
conversations of our mixed companies here; which, if they happen to
rise above bragg and whist, infallibly stop short of everything
either pleasing or instructive.
I take the reason of this to be, that (as
women generally give the 'ton' to the conversation) our English
women are not near so well informed and cultivated as the French;
besides that they are naturally more serious and silent.
I could wish there were a treaty made
between the French and English theatres, in which both parties
should make considerable concessions. The English ought to give up
their notorious violations of all the unities; and all their
massacres, racks, dead bodies, and mangled carcasses, which they so
frequently exhibit upon their stage. The French should engage to
have more action and less declamation; and not to cram and crowd
things together, to almost a degree of impossibility, from a too
scrupulous adherence to the unities. The English should restrain
the licentiousness of their poets, and the French enlarge the
liberty of theirs; their poets are the greatest slaves in their
country, and that is a bold word; ours are the most tumultuous
subjects in England, and that is saying a good deal. Under such
regulations one might hope to see a play in which one should not be
lulled to sleep by the length of a monotonical declamation, nor
frightened and shocked by the barbarity of the action. The unity of
time extended occasionally to three or four days, and the unity of
place broke into, as far as the same street, or sometimes the same
town; both which, I will affirm, are as probable as four-and-twenty
hours, and the same room.
More indulgence too, in my mind, should be
shown, than the French are willing to allow, to bright thoughts,
and to shining images; for though, I confess, it is not very
natural for a hero or a princess to say fine things in all the
violence of grief, love, rage, etc., yet, I can as well suppose
that, as I can that they should talk to themselves for half an
hour; which they must necessarily do, or no tragedy could be
carried on, unless they had recourse to a much greater absurdity,
the choruses of the ancients. Tragedy is of a nature, that one must
see it with a degree of self-deception; we must lend ourselves a
little to the delusion; and I am very willing to carry that
complaisance a little farther than the French do.
Tragedy must be something bigger than life,
or it would not affect us. In nature the most violent passions are
silent; in tragedy they must speak, and speak with dignity too.
Hence the necessity of their being written in verse, and
unfortunately for the French, from the weakness of their language,
in rhymes. And for the same reason, Cato the Stoic, expiring at
Utica, rhymes masculine and feminine at Paris; and fetches his last
breath at London, in most harmmonious and correct blank
verse.
It is quite otherwise with Comedy, which
should be mere common life, and not one jot bigger. Every character
should speak upon the stage, not only what it would utter in the
situation there represented, but in the same manner in which it
would express it. For which reason I cannot allow rhymes in comedy,
unless they were put into the mouth, and came out of the mouth of a
mad poet. But it is impossible to deceive one's self enough (nor is
it the least necessary in comedy) to suppose a dull rogue of an
usurer cheating, or 'gross Jean' blundering in the finest rhymes in
the world.
As for Operas, they are essentially too
absurd and extravagant to mention; I look upon them as a magic
scene, contrived to please the eyes and the ears, at the expense of
the understanding; and I consider singing, rhyming, and chiming
heroes, and princesses, and philosophers, as I do the hills, the
trees, the birds, and the beasts, who amicably joined in one common
country dance, to the irresistible turn of Orpheus's lyre. Whenever
I go to an opera, I leave my sense and reason at the door with my
half guinea, and deliver myself up to my eyes and my ears.
Thus I have made you my poetical confession;
in which I have acknowledged as many sins against the established
taste in both countries, as a frank heretic could have owned
against the established church in either, but I am now privileged
by my age to taste and think for myself, and not to care what other
people think of me in those respects; an advantage which youth,
among its many advantages, hath not. It must occasionally and
outwardly conform, to a certain degree, to establish tastes,
fashions, and decisions. A young man may, with a becoming modesty,
dissent, in private companies, from public opinions and prejudices:
but he must not attack them with warmth, nor magisterially set up
his own sentiments against them. Endeavor to hear, and know all
opinions; receive them with complaisance; form your own with
coolness, and give it with modesty.
I have received a letter from Sir John
Lambert, in which he requests me to use my interest to procure him
the remittance of Mr. Spencer's money, when he goes abroad and also
desires to know to whose account he is to place the postage of my
letters. I do not trouble him with a letter in answer, since you
can execute the commission. Pray make my compliments to him, and
assure him that I will do all I can to procure him Mr. Spencer's
business; but that his most effectual way will be by Messrs. Hoare,
who are Mr. Spencer's cashiers, and who will undoubtedly have their
choice upon whom they will give him his credit. As for the postage
of the letters, your purse and mine being pretty near the same, do
you pay it, over and above your next draught.
Your relations, the Princes B---, will soon
be with you at Paris; for they leave London this week: whenever you
converse with them, I desire it may be in Italian; that language
not being yet familiar enough to you.
By our printed papers, there seems to be a
sort of compromise between the King and the parliament, with regard
to the affairs of the hospitals, by taking them out of the hands of
the Archbishop of Paris, and placing them in Monsieur d'Argenson's:
if this be true, that compromise, as it is called, is clearly a
victory on the side of the court, and a defeat on the part of the
parliament; for if the parliament had a right, they had it as much
to the exclusion of Monsieur d'Argenson as of the Archbishop.
Adieu.
LETTER
CLVIII
LONDON, February 6,
O. S. 1752.
MY DEAR FRIEND: Your criticism of Varon is
strictly just; but, in truth, severe. You French critics seek for a
fault as eagerly as I do for a beauty: you consider things in the
worst light, to show your skill, at the expense of your pleasure; I
view them in the best, that I may have more pleasure, though at the
expense of my judgment. A 'trompeur trompeur et demi' is prettily
said; and, if you please, you may call 'Varon, un Normand', and
'Sostrate, un Manceau, qui vaut un Normand et demi'; and,
considering the 'denouement' in the light of trick upon trick, it
would undoubtedly be below the dignity of the buskin, and fitter
for the sock.
But let us see if we cannot bring off the
author. The great question upon which all turns, is to discover and
ascertain who Cleonice really is. There are doubts concerning her
'etat'; how shall they be cleared? Had the truth been extorted from
Varon (who alone knew) by the rack, it would have been a true
tragical 'denouement'. But that would probably not have done with
Varon, who is represented as a bold, determined, wicked, and at
that time desperate fellow; for he was in the hands of an enemy who
he knew could not forgive him, with common prudence or safety. The
rack would, therefore, have extorted no truth from him; but he
would have died enjoying the doubts of his enemies, and the
confusion that must necessarily attend those doubts. A stratagem is
therefore thought of to discover what force and terror could not,
and the stratagem such as no king or minister would disdain, to get
at an important discovery. If you call that stratagem a TRICK, you
vilify it, and make it comical; but call that trick a STRATAGEM, or
a MEASURE, and you dignify it up to tragedy: so frequently do
ridicule or dignity turn upon one single word. It is commonly said,
and more particularly by Lord Shaftesbury, that ridicule is the
best test of truth; for that it will not stick where it is not
just. I deny it. A truth learned in a certain light, and attacked
in certain words, by men of wit and humor, may, and often doth,
become ridiculous, at least so far that the truth is only
remembered and repeated for the sake of the ridicule. The overturn
of Mary of Medicis into a river, where she was half-drowned, would
never have been remembered if Madame de Vernuel, who saw it, had
not said 'la Reine boit'. Pleasure or malignity often gives
ridicule a weight which it does not deserve. The versification, I
must confess, is too much neglected and too often bad: but, upon
the whole, I read the play with pleasure.
If there is but a great deal of wit and
character in your new comedy, I will readily compound for its
having little or no plot. I chiefly mind dialogue and character in
comedies. Let dull critics feed upon the carcasses of plays; give
me the taste and the dressing.
I am very glad you went to Versailles to see
the ceremony of creating the Prince de Conde 'Chevalier de l'
Ordre'; and I do not doubt but that upon this occasion you informed
yourself thoroughly of the institution and rules of that order. If
you did, you were certainly told it was instituted by Henry III.
immediately after his return, or rather his flight from Poland; he
took the hint of it at Venice, where he had seen the original
manuscript of an order of the 'St. Esprit, ou droit desir', which
had been instituted in 1352, by Louis d'Anjou, King of Jerusalem
and Sicily, and husband to Jane, Queen of Naples, Countess of
Provence. This Order was under the protection of St. Nicholas de
Bari, whose image hung to the collar. Henry III. found the Order of
St. Michael prostituted and degraded, during the civil wars; he
therefore joined it to his new Order of the St. Esprit, and gave
them both together; for which reason every knight of the St. Esprit
is now called Chevalier des Ordres du Roi. The number of the
knights hath been different, but is now fixed to ONE HUNDRED,
exclusive of the sovereign. There, are many officers who wear the
riband of this Order, like the other knights; and what is very
singular is, that these officers frequently sell their employments,
but obtain leave to wear the blue riband still, though the
purchasers of those offices wear it also.
As you will have been a great while in
France, people will expect that you should be 'au fait' of all
these sort of things relative to that country. But the history of
all the Orders of all countries is well worth your knowledge; the
subject occurs often, and one should not be ignorant of it, for
fear of some such accident as happened to a solid Dane at Paris,
who, upon seeing 'L'Ordre du St. Esprit', said, 'Notre St. Esprit
chez nous c'est un Elephant'. Almost all the princes in Germany
have their Orders too; not dated, indeed, from any important
events, or directed to any great object, but because they will have
orders, to show that they may; as some of them, who have the 'jus
cudendae monetae', borrow ten shillings worth of gold to coin a
ducat. However, wherever you meet with them, inform yourself, and
minute down a short account of them; they take in all the colors of
Sir Isaac Newton's prisms. N. B: When you inquire about them, do
not seem to laugh.
I thank you for le Mandement de Monseigneur
l'Archeveyue; it is very well drawn, and becoming an archbishop.
But pray do not lose sight of a much more important object, I mean
the political disputes between the King and the parliament, and the
King and the clergy; they seem both to be patching up; but,
however, get the whole clue to them, as far as they have
gone.
I received a letter yesterday from Madame
Monconseil, who assures me you have gained ground 'du cote des
maniires', and that she looks upon you to be 'plus qu'a moitie
chemin'. I am very glad to hear this, because, if you are got above
half way of your journey, surely you will finish it, and not faint
in the course. Why do you think I have this affair so extremely at
heart, and why do I repeat it so often? Is it for your sake, or for
mine? You can immediately answer yourself that question; you
certainly have-I cannot possibly have any interest in it. If then
you will allow me, as I believe you may, to be a judge of what is
useful and necessary to you, you must, in consequence, be convinced
of the infinite importance of a point which I take so much pains to
inculcate.
I hear that the new Duke of Orleans 'a
remercie Monsieur de Melfort, and I believe, 'pas sans raison',
having had obligations to him; 'mais il ne l'a pas remercie en mari
poli', but rather roughly. Il faut que ce soit un bourru'. I am
told, too, that people get bits of his father's rags, by way of
relies; I wish them joy, they will do them a great deal of good.
See from hence what weaknesses human nature is capable of, and make
allowances for such in all your plans and reasonings. Study the
characters of the people you have to do with, and know what they
are, instead of thinking them what they should be; address yourself
generally to the senses, to the heart, and to the weaknesses of
mankind, but very rarely to their reason.
Good-night or good-morrow to you, according
to the time you shall receive this letter from, Yours.
LETTER
CLIX
LONDON, February
14, O. S. 1752.
MY DEAR FRIEND: In a month's time, I believe
I shall have the pleasure of sending you, and you will have the
pleasure of reading, a work of Lord Bolingbroke's, in two volumes
octavo, "Upon the Use of History," in several letters to Lord Hyde,
then Lord Cornbury. It is now put into the press. It is hard to
determine whether this work will instruct or please most: the most
material historical facts, from the great era of the treaty of
Munster, are touched upon, accompanied by the most solid
reflections, and adorned by all that elegance of style which was
peculiar to himself, and in which, if Cicero equals, he certainly
does not exceed him; but every other writer falls short of him. I
would advise you almost to get this book by heart. I think you have
a turn to history, you love it, and have a memory to retain it:
this book will teach you the proper use of it. Some people load
their memories indiscriminately with historical facts, as others do
their stomachs with food; and bring out the one, and bring up the
other, entirely crude and undigested. You will find in Lord
Bolingbroke's book an infallible specific against that epidemical
complaint.-[It is important to remember that at this time Lord
Bolingbroke's philosophical works had not appeared; which accounts
for Lord Chesterfield's recommending to his son, in this, as well
as in some foregoing passages, the study of Lord Bolingbroke's
writings.]
I remember a gentleman who had read history
in this thoughtless and undistinguishing manner, and who, having
traveled, had gone through the Valtelline. He told me that it was a
miserable poor country, and therefore it was, surely, a great error
in Cardinal Richelieu to make such a rout, and put France to so
much expense about it. Had my friend read history as he ought to
have done, he would have known that the great object of that great
minister was to reduce the power of the House of Austria; and in
order to that, to cut off as much as he could the communication
between the several parts of their then extensive dominions; which
reflections would have justified the Cardinal to him, in the affair
of the Valtelline. But it was easier to him to remember facts, than
to combine and reflect.
One observation I hope you will make in
reading history; for it is an obvious and a true one. It is, that
more people have made great figures and great fortunes in courts by
their exterior accomplishments, than by their interior
qualifications. Their engaging address, the politeness of their
manners, their air, their turn, hath almost always paved the way
for their superior abilities, if they have such, to exert
themselves. They have been favorites before they have been
ministers. In courts, an universal gentleness and 'douceur dans les
manieres' is most absolutely necessary: an offended fool, or a
slighted valet de chambre, may very possibly do you more hurt at
court, than ten men of merit can do you good. Fools, and low
people, are always jealous of their dignity, and never forget nor
forgive what they reckon a slight: on the other hand, they take
civility and a little attention as a favor; remember, and
acknowledge it: this, in my mind, is buying them cheap; and
therefore they are worth buying. The prince himself, who is rarely
the shining genius of his court, esteems you only by hearsay but
likes you by his senses; that is, from your air, your politeness,
and your manner of addressing him, of which alone he is a judge.
There is a court garment, as well as a wedding garment, without
which you will not be received. That garment is the 'volto
sciolto'; an imposing air, an elegant politeness, easy and engaging
manners, universal attention, an insinuating gentleness, and all
those 'je ne sais quoi' that compose the GRACES.
I am this moment disagreeably interrupted by
a letter; not from you, as I expected, but from a friend of yours
at Paris, who informs me that you have a fever which confines you
at home. Since you have a fever, I am glad you have prudence enough
in it to stay at home, and take care of yourself; a little more
prudence might probably have prevented it. Your blood is young, and
consequently hot; and you naturally make a great deal by your good
stomach and good digestion; you should, therefore, necessarily
attenuate and cool it, from time to time, by gentle purges, or by a
very low diet, for two or three days together, if you would avoid
fevers. Lord Bacon, who was a very great physician in both senses
of the word, hath this aphorism in his "Essay upon Health," 'Nihil
magis ad Sanitatem tribuit quam crebrae et domesticae purgationes'.
By 'domesticae', he means those simple uncompounded purgatives
which everybody can administer to themselves; such as senna-tea,
stewed prunes and senria, chewing a little rhubarb, or dissolving
an ounce and a half of manna in fair water, with the juice of a
lemon to make it palatable. Such gentle and unconfining evacuations
would certainly prevent those feverish attacks to which everybody
at your age is subject.
By the way, I do desire, and insist, that
whenever, from any indisposition, you are not able to write to me
upon the fixed days, that Christian shall; and give me a TRUE
account how you are. I do not expect from him the Ciceronian
epistolary style; but I will content myself with the Swiss
simplicity and truth.
I hope you extend your acquaintance at
Paris, and frequent variety of companies; the only way of knowing
the world; every set of company differs in some particulars from
another; and a man of business must, in the course of his life,
have to do with all sorts. It is a very great advantage to know the
languages of the several countries one travels in; and different
companies may, in some degree, be considered as different
countries; each hath its distinctive language, customs, and
manners: know them all, and you will wonder at none.
Adieu, child. Take care of your health;
there are no pleasures without it.
LETTER
CLX
LONDON, February
20, O. S. 1752.
MY DEAR FRIEND: In all systems whatsoever,
whether of religion, government, morals, etc., perfection is the
object always proposed, though possibly unattainable; hitherto, at
least, certainly unattained. However, those who aim carefully at
the mark itself, will unquestionably come nearer it, than those who
from despair, negligence, or indolence, leave to chance the work of
skill. This maxim holds equally true in common life; those who aim
at perfection will come infinitely nearer it than those desponding
or indolent spirits, who foolishly say to themselves: Nobody is
perfect; perfection is unattainable; to attempt it is chimerical; I
shall do as well as others; why then should I give myself trouble
to be what I never can, and what, according to the common course of
things, I need not be, PERFECT?
I am very sure that I need not point out to
you the weakness and the folly of this reasoning, if it deserves
the name of reasoning. It would discourage and put a stop to the
exertion of any one of our faculties. On the contrary, a man of
sense and spirit says to himself: Though the point of perfection
may (considering the imperfection of our nature) be unattainable,
my care, my endeavors, my attention, shall not be wanting to get as
near it as I can. I will approach it every day, possibly, I may
arrive at it at last; at least, what I am sure is in my own power,
I will not be distanced. Many fools (speaking of you) say to me:
What! would you have him perfect? I answer: Why not? What hurt
would it do him or me? O, but that is impossible, say they; I
reply, I am not sure of that: perfection in the abstract, I admit
to be unattainable, but what is commonly called perfection in a
character I maintain to be attainable, and not only that, but in
every man's power. He hath, continue they, a good head, a good
heart, a good fund of knowledge, which would increase daily: What
would you have more? Why, I would have everything more that can
adorn and complete a character. Will it do his head, his heart, or
his knowledge any harm, to have the utmost delicacy of manners, the
most shining advantages of air and address, the most endearing
attentions, and the most engaging graces? But as he is, say they,
he is loved wherever he is known. I am very glad of it, say I; but
I would have him be liked before he is known, and loved afterward.
I would have him, by his first abord and address, make people wish
to know him, and inclined to love him: he will save a great deal of
time by it. Indeed, reply they, you are too nice, too exact, and
lay too much stress upon things that are of very little
consequence. Indeed, rejoin I, you know very little of the nature
of mankind, if you take those things to be of little consequence:
one cannot be too attentive to them; it is they that always engage
the heart, of which the understanding is commonly the bubble. And I
would much rather that he erred in a point of grammar, of history,
of philosophy, etc., than in point of manners and address. But
consider, he is very young; all this will come in time. I hope so;
but that time must be when he is young, or it will never be at all;
the right 'pli' must be taken young, or it will never be easy or
seem natural. Come, come, say they (substituting, as is frequently
done, assertion instead of argument), depend upon it he will do
very well: and you have a great deal of reason to be satisfied with
him. I hope and believe he will do well, but I would have him do
better than well. I am very well pleased with him, but I would be
more, I would be proud of him. I would have him have lustre as well
as weight. Did you ever know anybody that reunited all these
talents? Yes, I did; Lord Bolingbroke joined all the politeness,
the manners, and the graces of a courtier, to the solidity of a
statesman, and to the learning of a pedant. He was 'omnis homo';
and pray what should hinder my boy from being so too, if he 'hath,
as I think he hath, all the other qualifications that you allow
him? Nothing can hinder him, but neglect of or inattention to,
those objects which his own good sense must tell him are, of
infinite consequence to him, and which therefore I will not suppose
him capable of either neglecting or despising.
This (to tell you the whole truth) is the
result of a controversy that passed yesterday, between Lady Hervey
and myself, upon your subject, and almost in the very words. I
submit the decision of it to yourself; let your own good sense
determine it, and make you act in consequence of that
determination. The receipt to make this composition is short and
infallible; here I give it to you:
Take variety of the best company, wherever
you are; be minutely attentive to every word and action; imitate
respectively those whom you observe to be distinguished and
considered for any one accomplishment; then mix all those several
accomplishments together, and serve them up yourself to
others.
I hope your fair, or rather your brown
AMERICAN is well. I hear that she makes very handsome presents, if
she is not so herself. I am told there are people at Paris who
expect, from this secret connection, to see in time a volume of
letters, superior to Madame de Graffiny's Peruvian ones; I lay in
my claim to one of the first copies.
Francis's Genie-[Francis's "Eugenia."]-hath
been acted twice, with most universal applause; to-night is his
third night, and I am going to it. I did not think it would have
succeeded so well, considering how long our British audiences have
been accustomed to murder, racks, and poison, in every tragedy; but
it affected the heart so much, that it triumphed over habit and
prejudice. All the women cried, and all the men were moved. The
prologue, which is a very good one, was made entirely by Garrick.
The epilogue is old Cibber's; but corrected, though not enough, by
Francis. He will get a great deal of, money by it; and,
consequently, be better able to lend you sixpence, upon any
emergency.
The parliament of Paris, I find by the
newspapers, has not carried its point concerning the hospitals,
and, though the King hath given up the Archbishop, yet as he has
put them under the management and direction 'du Grand Conseil', the
parliament is equally out of the question. This will naturally put
you upon inquiring into the constitution of the 'Grand Conseil'.
You will, doubtless, inform yourself who it is composed of, what
things are 'de son ressort', whether or not there lies an appeal
from thence to any other place; and of all other particulars, that
may give you a clear notion of this assembly. There are also three
or four other Conseils in France, of which you ought to know the
constitution and the objects; I dare say you do know them already;
but if you do not, lose no time in informing yourself. These
things, as I have often told you, are best learned in various
French companies: but in no English ones, for none of our
countrymen trouble their heads about them. To use a very trite
image, collect, like the bee, your store from every quarter. In
some companies ('parmi les fermiers generaux nommement') you may,
by proper inquiries, get a general knowledge, at least, of 'les
affaires des finances'. When you are with 'des gens de robe', suck
them with regard to the constitution, and civil government, and
'sic de caeteris'. This shows you the advantage of keeping a great
deal of different French company; an advantage much superior to any
that you can possibly receive from loitering and sauntering away
evenings in any English company at Paris, not even excepting Lord
A---. Love of ease, and fear of restraint (to both which I doubt
you are, for a young fellow, too much addicted) may invite you
among your countrymen: but pray withstand those mean temptations,
'et prenez sur vous', for the sake of being in those assemblies,
which alone can inform your mind and improve your manners. You have
not now many months to continue at Paris; make the most of them;
get into every house there, if you can; extend acquaintance, know
everything and everybody there; that when you leave it for other
places, you may be 'au fait', and even able to explain whatever you
may hear mentioned concerning it. Adieu.
LETTER
CLXI
LONDON, March 2, O.
S. 1752.
MY DEAR FRIEND: Whereabouts are you in
Ariosto? Or have you gone through that most ingenious contexture of
truth and lies, of serious and extravagant, of knights-errant,
magicians, and all that various matter which he announces in the
beginning of his poem:
Le Donne, I Cavalier, l'arme, gli
amori,
Le cortesie, l'audaci impreso io
canto.
I am by no means sure that Homer had
superior invention, or excelled more in description than Ariosto.
What can be more seducing and voluptuous, than the description of
Alcina's person and palace? What more ingeniously extravagant, than
the search made in the moon for Orlando's lost wits, and the
account of other people's that were found there? The whole is worth
your attention, not only as an ingenious poem, but as the source of
all modern tales, novels, fables, and romances; as Ovid's
"Metamorphoses;" was of the ancient ones; besides, that when you
have read this work, nothing will be difficult to you in the
Italian language. You will read Tasso's 'Gierusalemme', and the
'Decamerone di Boccacio', with great facility afterward; and when
you have read those three authors, you will, in my opinion, have
read all the works of invention that are worth reading in that
language; though the Italians would be very angry at me for saying
so.
A gentleman should know those which I call
classical works, in every language; such as Boileau, Corneille,
Racine, Moliere, etc., in French; Milton, Dryden, Pope, Swift,
etc., in English; and the three authors above mentioned in Italian;
whether you have any such in German I am not quite sure, nor,
indeed, am I inquisitive. These sort of books adorn the mind,
improve the fancy, are frequently alluded to by, and are often the
subjects of conversations of the best companies. As you have
languages to read, and memory to retain them, the knowledge of them
is very well worth the little pains it will cost you, and will
enable you to shine in company. It is not pedantic to quote and
allude to them, which it would be with regard to the
ancients.
Among the many advantages which you have had
in your education, I do not consider your knowledge of several
languages as the least. You need not trust to translations; you can
go to the source; you can both converse and negotiate with people
of all nations, upon equal terms; which is by no means the case of
a man, who converses or negotiates in a language which those with
whom he hath to do know much better than himself. In business, a
great deal may depend upon the force and extent of one word; and,
in conversation, a moderate thought may gain, or a good one lose,
by the propriety or impropriety, the elegance or inelegance of one
single word. As therefore you now know four modern languages well,
I would have you study (and, by the way, it will be very little
trouble to you) to know them correctly, accurately, and delicately.
Read some little books that treat of them, and ask questions
concerning their delicacies, of those who are able to answer you.
As, for instance, should I say in French, 'la lettre que je vous ai
ECRIT', or, 'la lettre que je vous ai ECRITE'? in which, I think,
the French differ among themselves. There is a short French grammar
by the Port Royal, and another by Pere Buffier, both which are
worth your reading; as is also a little book called 'Les Synonymes
Francois. There are books of that kind upon the Italian language,
into some of which I would advise you to dip; possibly the German
language may have something of the same sort, and since you already
speak it, the more properly you speak it the better; one would, I
think, as far as possible, do all one does correctly and elegantly.
It is extremely engaging to people of every nation, to meet with a
foreigner who hath taken pains enough to speak their language
correctly; it flatters that local and national pride and prejudice
of which everybody hath some share.
Francis's "Eugenia," which I will send you,
pleased most people of good taste here; the boxes were crowded till
the sixth night, when the pit and gallery were totally deserted,
and it was dropped. Distress, without death, was not sufficient to
affect a true British audience, so long accustomed to daggers,
racks, and bowls of poison: contrary to Horace's rule, they desire
to see Medea murder her children upon the stage. The sentiments
were too delicate to move them; and their hearts are to be taken by
storm, not by parley.
Have you got the things, which were taken
from you at Calais, restored? and, among them, the little packet
which my sister gave you for Sir Charles Hotham? In this case, have
you forwarded it to him? If you have not had an opportunity, you
will have one soon; which I desire you will not omit; it is by
Monsieur d'Aillion, whom you will see in a few days at Paris, in
his way to Geneva, where Sir Charles now is, and will remain some
time. Adieu:
LETTER
CLXII
LONDON, March 5, O.
S. 1752
MY DEAR FRIEND: As I have received no letter
from you by the usual post, I am uneasy upon account of your
health; for, had you been well, I am sure you would have written,
according to your engagement and my requisition. You have not the
least notion of any care of your health; but though I would not
have you be a valetudinarian, I must tell you that the best and
most robust health requires some degree of attention to preserve.
Young fellows, thinking they have so much health and time before
them, are very apt to neglect or lavish both, and beggar themselves
before they are aware: whereas a prudent economy in both would make
them rich indeed; and so far from breaking in upon their pleasures,
would improve, and almost perpetuate them. Be you wiser, and,
before it is too late, manage both with care and frugality; and lay
out neither, but upon good interest and security.
I will now confine myself to the employment
of your time, which, though I have often touched upon formerly, is
a subject that, from its importance, will bear repetition. You have
it is true, a great deal of time before you; but, in this period of
your life, one hour usefully employed may be worth more than
four-and-twenty hereafter; a minute is precious to you now, whole
days may possibly not be so forty years hence. Whatever time you
allow, or can snatch for serious reading (I say snatch, because
company and the knowledge of the world is now your chief object),
employ it in the reading of some one book, and that a good one,
till you have finished it: and do not distract your mind with
various matters at the same time. In this light I would recommend
to you to read 'tout de suite' Grotius 'de Jure Belli et Pacis',
translated by Barbeyrac, and Puffendorff's 'Jus Gentium',
translated by the same hand. For accidental quarters of hours, read
works of invention, wit and humor, of the best, and not of trivial
authors, either ancient or modern.
Whatever business you have, do it the first
moment you can; never by halves, but finish it without
interruption, if possible. Business must not be sauntered and
trifled with; and you must not say to it, as Felix did to Paul, "At
a more convenient season I will speak to thee." The most convenient
season for business is the first; but study and business in some
measure point out their own times to a man of sense; time is much
oftener squandered away in the wrong choice and improper methods of
amusement and pleasures.
Many people think that they are in
pleasures, provided they are neither in study nor in business.
Nothing like it; they are doing nothing, and might just as well be
asleep. They contract habitudes from laziness, and they only
frequent those places where they are free from all restraints and
attentions. Be upon your guard against this idle profusion of time;
and let every place you go to be either the scene of quick and
lively pleasures, or the school of your own improvements; let every
company you go into either gratify your senses, extend your
knowledge, or refine your manners. Have some decent object of
gallantry in view at some places; frequent others, where people of
wit and taste assemble; get into others, where people of superior
rank and dignity command respect and attention from the rest of the
company; but pray frequent no neutral places, from mere idleness
and indolence. Nothing forms a young man so much as being used to
keep respectable and superior company, where a constant regard and
attention is necessary. It is true, this is at first a disagreeable
state of restraint; but it soon grows habitual, and consequently
easy; and you are amply paid for it, by the improvement you make,
and the credit it gives you. What you said some time ago was very
true, concerning 'le Palais Royal'; to one of your age the
situation is disagreeable enough: you cannot expect to be much
taken notice of; but all that time you can take notice of others;
observe their manners, decipher their characters, and insensibly
you will become one of the company.
All this I went through myself, when I was
of your age. I have sat hours in company without being taken the
least notice of; but then I took notice of them, and learned in
their company how to behave myself better in the next, till by
degrees I became part of the best companies myself. But I took
great care not to lavish away my time in those companies where
there were neither quick pleasures nor useful improvements to be
expected.
Sloth, indolence, and 'mollesse' are
pernicious and unbecoming a young fellow; let them be your
'ressource' forty years hence at soonest. Determine, at all events,
and however disagreeable it may to you in some respects, and for
some time, to keep the most distinguished and fashionable company
of the place you are at, either for their rank, or for their
learning, or 'le bel esprit et le gout'. This gives you credentials
to the best companies, wherever you go afterward. Pray, therefore,
no indolence, no laziness; but employ every minute in your life in
active pleasures, or useful employments. Address yourself to some
woman of fashion and beauty, wherever you are, and try how far that
will go. If the place be not secured beforehand, and garrisoned,
nine times in ten you will take it. By attentions and respect you
may always get into the highest company: and by some admiration and
applause, whether merited or not, you may be sure of being welcome
among 'les savans et les beaux esprits'. There are but these three
sorts of company for a young fellow; there being neither pleasure
nor profit in any other.
My uneasiness with regard to your health is
this moment removed by your letter of the 8th N. S., which, by what
accident I do not know, I did not receive before.
I long to read Voltaire's 'Rome Sauvee',
which, by the very faults that your SEVERE critics find with it, I
am sure I shall like; for I will at an any time give up a good deal
of regularity for a great deal of brillant; and for the brillant
surely nobody is equal to Voltaire. Catiline's conspiracy is an
unhappy subject for a tragedy; it is too single, and gives no
opportunity to the poet to excite any of the tender passions; the
whole is one intended act of horror, Crebillon was sensible of this
defect, and to create another interest, most absurdly made Catiline
in love with Cicero's daughter, and her with him.
I am very glad that you went to Versailles,
and dined with Monsieur de St. Contest. That is company to learn
'les bonnes manieres' in; and it seems you had 'les bonnes
morceaux' into the bargain. Though you were no part of the King of
France's conversation with the foreign ministers, and probably not
much entertained with it, do you think that it is not very useful
to you to hear it, and to observe the turn and manners of people of
that sort? It is extremely useful to know it well. The same in the
next rank of people, such as ministers of state, etc., in whose
company, though you cannot yet, at your age, bear a part, and
consequently be diverted, you will observe and learn, what
hereafter it may be necessary for you to act.
Tell Sir John Lambert that I have this day
fixed Mr. Spencer's having his credit upon him; Mr. Hoare had also
recommended him. I believe Mr. Spencer will set out next month for
some place in France, but not Paris. I am sure he wants a great
deal of France, for at present he is most entirely English: and you
know very well what I think of that. And so we bid you heartily
good-night.
LETTER
CLXIII
LONDON, March 16,
O. S. 1752
MY DEAR FRIEND: How do you go on with the
most useful and most necessary of all studies, the study of the
world? Do you find that you gain knowledge? And does your daily
experience at once extend and demonstrate your improvement? You
will possibly ask me how you can judge of that yourself. I will
tell you a sure way of knowing. Examine yourself, and see whether
your notions of the world are changed, by experience, from what
they were two years ago in theory; for that alone is one favorable
symptom of improvement. At that age (I remember it in myself) every
notion that one forms is erroneous; one hath seen few models, and
those none of the best, to form one's self upon. One thinks that
everything is to be carried by spirit and vigor; that art is
meanness, and that versatility and complaisance are the refuge of
pusilanimity and weakness. This most mistaken opinion gives an
indelicacy, a 'brusquerie', and a roughness to the manners. Fools,
who can never be undeceived, retain them as long as they live:
reflection, with a little experience, makes men of sense shake them
off soon. When they come to be a little better acquainted with
themselves, and with their own species, they discover that plain
right reason is, nine times in ten, the fettered and shackled
attendant of the triumph of the heart and the passions; and,
consequently, they address themselves nine times in ten to the
conqueror, not to the conquered: and conquerors, you know, must be
applied to in the gentlest, the most engaging, and the most
insinuating manner. Have you found out that every woman is
infallibly to be gained by every sort of flattery, and every man by
one sort or other? Have you discovered what variety of little
things affect the heart, and how surely they collectively gain it?
If you have, you have made some progress. I would try a man's
knowledge of the world, as I would a schoolboy's knowledge of
Horace: not by making him construe 'Maecenas atavis edite regibus',
which he could do in the first form; but by examining him as to the
delicacy and 'curiosa felicitas' of that poet. A man requires very
little knowledge and experience of the world, to understand
glaring, high-colored, and decided characters; they are but few,
and they strike at first: but to distinguish the almost
imperceptible shades, and the nice gradations of virtue and vice,
sense and folly, strength and weakness (of which characters are
commonly composed), demands some experience, great observation, and
minute attention. In the same cases, most people do the same
things, but with this material difference, upon which the success
commonly turns: A man who hath studied the world knows when to
time, and where to place them; he hath analyzed the characters he
applies to, and adapted his address and his arguments to them: but
a man, of what is called plain good sense, who hath only reasoned
by himself, and not acted with mankind, mistimes, misplaces, runs
precipitately and bluntly at the mark, and falls upon his nose in
the way. In the common manners of social life, every man of common
sense hath the rudiments, the A B C of civility; he means not to
offend, and even wishes to please: and, if he hath any real merit,
will be received and tolerated in good company. But that is far
from being enough; for, though he may be received, he will never be
desired; though he does not offend, he will never be loved; but,
like some little, insignificant, neutral power, surrounded by great
ones, he will neither be feared nor courted by any; but, by turns,
invaded by all, whenever it is their interest. A most contemptible
situation! Whereas, a man who hath carefully attended to, and
experienced, the various workings of the heart, and the artifices
of the head; and who, by one shade, can trace the progression of
the whole color; who can, at the proper times, employ all the
several means of persuading the understanding, and engaging the
heart, may and will have enemies; but will and must have friends:
he may be opposed, but he will be supported too; his talents may
excite the jealousy of some, but his engaging arts will make him
beloved by many more; he will be considerable; he will be
considered. Many different qualifications must conspire to form
such a man, and to make him at once respectable and amiable; the
least must be joined to the greatest; the latter would be
unavailing without the former; and the former would be futile and
frivolous, without the latter. Learning is acquired by reading
books; but the much more necessary learning, the knowledge of the
world, is only to be acquired by reading men, and studying all the
various editions of them. Many words in every language are
generally thought to be synonymous; but those who study the
language attentively will find, that there is no such thing; they
will discover some little difference, some distinction between all
those words that are vulgarly called synonymous; one hath always
more energy, extent, or delicacy, than another. It is the same with
men; all are in general, and yet no two in particular, exactly
alike. Those who have not accurately studied, perpetually mistake
them; they do not discern the shades and gradations that
distinguish characters seemingly alike. Company, various company,
is the only school for this knowledge. You ought to be, by this
time, at least in the third form of that school, from whence the
rise to the uppermost is easy and quick; but then you must have
application and vivacity; and you must not only bear with, but even
seek restraint in most companies, instead of stagnating in one or
two only, where indolence and love of ease may be indulged.
In the plan which I gave you in my
last,-[That letter is missing.]-for your future motions, I forgot
to tell you; that, if a king of the Romans should be chosen this
year, you shall certainly be at that election; and as, upon those
occasions, all strangers are excluded from the place of the
election, except such as belong to some ambassador, I have already
eventually secured you a place in the suite of the King's Electoral
Ambassador, who will be sent upon that account to Frankfort, or
wherever else the election may be. This will not only secure you a
sight of the show, but a knowledge of the whole thing; which is
likely to be a contested one, from the opposition of some of the
electors, and the protests of some of the princes of the empire.
That election, if there is one, will, in my opinion, be a memorable
era in the history of the empire; pens at least, if not swords,
will be drawn; and ink, if not blood, will be plentifully shed by
the contending parties in that dispute. During the fray, you may
securely plunder, and add to your present stock of knowledge of the
'jus publicum imperii'. The court of France hath, I am told,
appointed le President Ogier, a man of great abilities, to go
immediately to Ratisbon, 'pour y souffler la discorde'. It must be
owned that France hath always profited skillfully of its having
guaranteed the treaty of Munster; which hath given it a constant
pretense to thrust itself into the affairs of the empire. When
France got Alsace yielded by treaty, it was very willing to have
held it as a fief of the empire; but the empire was then wiser.
Every power should be very careful not to give the least pretense
to a neighboring power to meddle with the affairs of its interior.
Sweden hath already felt the effects of the Czarina's calling
herself Guarantee of its present form of government, in consequence
of the treaty of Neustadt, confirmed afterward by that of Abo;
though, in truth, that guarantee was rather a provision against
Russia's attempting to alter the then new established form of
government in Sweden, than any right given to Russia to hinder the
Swedes from establishing what form of government they pleased. Read
them both, if you can get them. Adieu.
LETTER
CLXIV
LONDON, April 73,
O. S. 1752
MY DEAR FRIEND: I receive this moment your
letter of the 19th, N. S., with the inclosed pieces relative to the
present dispute between the King and the parliament. I shall return
them by Lord Huntingdon, whom you will soon see at Paris, and who
will likewise carry you the piece, which I forgot in making up the
packet I sent you by the Spanish Ambassador. The representation of
the parliament is very well drawn, 'suaviter in modo, fortiter in
re'. They tell the King very respectfully, that, in a certain case,
WHICH THEY SHOULD THINK IT CRIMINAL To SUPPOSE, they would not obey
him. This hath a tendency to what we call here revolution
principles. I do not know what the Lord's anointed, his vicegerent
upon earth, divinely appointed by him, and accountable to none but
him for his actions, will either think or do, upon these symptoms
of reason and good sense, which seem to be breaking out all over
France: but this I foresee, that, before the end of this century,
the trade of both king and priest will not be half so good a one as
it has been. Du Clos, in his "Reflections," hath observed, and very
truly, 'qu'il y a un germe de raison qui commence a se developper
en France';-a developpement that must prove fatal to Regal and
Papal pretensions. Prudence may, in many cases, recommend an
occasional submission to either; but when that ignorance, upon
which an implicit faith in both could only be founded, is once
removed, God's Vicegerent, and Christ's Vicar, will only be obeyed
and believed, as far as what the one orders, and the other says, is
conformable to reason and to truth.
I am very glad (to use a vulgar expression)
that You MAKE AS IF YOU WERE NOT WELL, though you really are; I am
sure it is the likeliest way to keep so. Pray leave off entirely
your greasy, heavy pastry, fat creams, and indigestible dumplings;
and then you need not confine yourself to white meats, which I do
not take to be one jot wholesomer than beef, mutton, and
partridge.
Voltaire sent me, from Berlin, his 'History
du Siecle de Louis XIV. It came at a very proper time; Lord
Bolingbroke had just taught me how history should be read; Voltaire
shows me how it should be written. I am sensible that it will meet
with almost as many critics as readers. Voltaire must be
criticised; besides, every man's favorite is attacked: for every
prejudice is exposed, and our prejudices are our mistresses; reason
is at best our wife, very often heard indeed, but seldom minded. It
is the history of the human understanding, written by a man of
parts, for the use of men of parts. Weak minds will not like it,
even though they do not understand it; which is commonly the
measure of their admiration. Dull ones will want those minute and
uninteresting details with which most other histories are
encumbered. He tells me all I want to know, and nothing more. His
reflections are short, just, and produce others in his readers.
Free from religious, philosophical, political and national
prejudices, beyond any historian I ever met with, he relates all
those matters as truly and as impartially, as certain regards,
which must always be to some degree observed, will allow him; for
one sees plainly that he often says much less than he would say, if
he might. He hath made me much better acquainted with the times of
Lewis XIV., than the innumerable volumes which I had read could do;
and hath suggested this reflection to me, which I have never made
before-His vanity, not his knowledge, made him encourage all, and
introduce many arts and sciences in his country. He opened in a
manner the human understanding in France, and brought it to its
utmost perfection; his age equalled in all, and greatly exceeded in
many things (pardon me, Pedants!) the Augustan. This was great and
rapid; but still it might be done, by the encouragement, the
applause, and the rewards of a vain, liberal, and magnificent
prince. What is much more surprising is, that he stopped the
operations of the human mind just where he pleased; and seemed to
say, "Thus far shalt thou go, and no farther." For, a bigot to his
religion, and jealous of his power, free and rational thoughts upon
either, never entered into a French head during his reign; and the
greatest geniuses that ever any age produced, never entertained a
doubt of the divine right of Kings, or the infallibility of the
Church. Poets, Orators, and Philosophers, ignorant of their natural
rights, cherished their chains; and blind, active faith triumphed,
in those great minds, over silent and passive reason. The reverse
of this seems now to be the case in France: reason opens itself;
fancy and invention fade and decline.
I will send you a copy of this history by
Lord Huntingdon, as I think it very probable that it is not allowed
to be published and sold at Paris. Pray read it more than once, and
with attention, particularly the second volume, which contains
short, but very clear accounts of many very interesting things,
which are talked of by everybody, though fairly. understood by very
few. There are two very puerile affectations which I wish this book
had been free from; the one is, the total subversion of all the old
established French orthography; the other is, the not making use of
any one capital letter throughout the whole book, except at the
beginning of a paragraph. It offends my eyes to see rome, paris,
france, Caesar, I henry the fourth, etc., begin with small letters;
and I do not conceive that there can be any reason for doing it,
half so strong as the reason of long usage is to the contrary. This
is an affectation below Voltaire; who, I am not ashamed to say,
that I admire and delight in, as an author, equally in prose and in
verse.
I had a letter a few days ago from Monsieur
du Boccage, in which he says, 'Monsieur Stanhope s'est jete dans la
politique, et je crois qu'il y reussira': You do very well, it is
your destination; but remember that, to succeed in great things,
one must first learn to please in little ones. Engaging manners and
address must prepare the way for superior knowledge and abilities
to act with effect. The late Duke of Marlborough's manners and
address prevailed with the first king of Prussia, to let his troops
remain in the army of the Allies, when neither their
representations, nor his own share in the common cause could do it.
The Duke of Marlborough had no new matter to urge to him; but had a
manner, which he could not, nor did not, resist. Voltaire, among a
thousand little delicate strokes of that kind, says of the Duke de
la Feuillade, 'qu'il etoit l'homme le plus brillant et le plus
aimable du royaume; et quoique gendre du General et Ministre, il
avoit pour lui la faveur publique'. Various little circumstances of
that sort will often make a man of great real merit be hated, if he
hath not address and manners to make him be loved. Consider all
your own circumstances seriously; and you will find that, of all
arts, the art of pleasing is the most necessary for you to study
and possess. A silly tyrant said, 'oderint modo timeant'; a wise
man would have said, 'modo ament nihil timendum est mihi'. Judge
from your own daily experience, of the efficacy of that pleasing
'je ne sais quoi', when you feel, as you and everybody certainly
does, that in men it is more engaging than knowledge, in women than
beauty.
I long to see Lord and Lady----(who are not
yet arrived), because they have lately seen you; and I always
fancy, that I can fish out something new concerning you, from those
who have seen you last: not that I shall much rely upon their
accounts, because I distrust the judgment of Lord and Lady----, in
those matters about which I am most inquisitive. They have ruined
their own son by what they called and thought loving him. They have
made him believe that the world was made for him, not he for the
world; and unless he stays abroad a great while, and falls into
very good company, he will expect, what he will never find, the
attentions and complaisance from others, which he has hitherto been
used to from Papa and Mamma. This, I fear, is too much the case of
Mr. ----; who, I doubt, will be run through the body, and be near
dying, before he knows how to live. However you may turn out, you
can never make me any of these reproaches. I indulged no silly,
womanish fondness for you; instead of inflicting my tenderness upon
you, I have taken all possible methods to make you deserve it; and
thank God you do; at least, I know but one article, in which you
are different from what I could wish you; and you very well know
what that is I want: That I and all the world should like you, as
well as I love you. Adieu.
LETTER
CLXV
LONDON, April 30,
O. S. 1752.
MY DEAR FRIEND: 'Avoir du monde' is, in my
opinion, a very just and happy expression for having address,
manners, and for knowing how to behave properly in all companies;
and it implies very truly that a man who hath not those
accomplishments is not of the world. Without them, the best parts
are inefficient, civility is absurd, and freedom offensive. A
learned parson, rusting in his cell, at Oxford or Cambridge, will
season admirably well upon the nature of man; will profoundly
analyze the head, the heart, the reason, the will, the passions,
the senses, the sentiments, and all those subdivisions of we know
not what; and yet, unfortunately, he knows nothing of man, for he
hath not lived with him; and is ignorant of all the various modes,
habits, prejudices, and tastes, that always influence and often
determine him. He views man as he does colors in Sir Isaac Newton's
prism, where only the capital ones are seen; but an experienced
dyer knows all their various shades and gradations, together with
the result of their several mixtures. Few men are of one plain,
decided color; most are mixed, shaded, and blended; and vary as
much, from different situations, as changeable silks do form
different lights. The man 'qui a du monde' knows all this from his
own experience and observation: the conceited, cloistered
philosopher knows nothing of it from his own theory; his practice
is absurd and improper, and he acts as awkwardly as a man would
dance, who had never seen others dance, nor learned of a
dancing-master; but who had only studied the notes by which dances
are now pricked down as well as tunes. Observe and imitate, then,
the address, the arts, and the manners of those 'qui ont du monde':
see by what methods they first make, and afterward improve
impressions in their favor. Those impressions are much oftener
owing to little causes than to intrinsic merit; which is less
volatile, and hath not so sudden an effect. Strong minds have
undoubtedly an ascendant over weak ones, as Galigai Marachale
d'Ancre very justly observed, when, to the disgrace and reproach of
those times, she was executed for having governed Mary of Medicis
by the arts of witchcraft and magic. But then ascendant is to be
gained by degrees, and by those arts only which experience and the
knowledge of the world teaches; for few are mean enough to be
bullied, though most are weak enough to be bubbled. I have often
seen people of superior, governed by people of much inferior parts,
without knowing or even suspecting that they were so governed. This
can only happen when those people of inferior parts have more
worldly dexterity and experience, than those they govern. They see
the weak and unguarded part, and apply to it they take it, and all
the rest follows. Would you gain either men or women, and every man
of sense desires to gain both, 'il faut du monde'. You have had
more opportunities than ever any man had, at your age, of acquiring
'ce monde'. You have been in the best companies of most countries,
at an age when others have hardly been in any company at all. You
are master of all those languages, which John Trott seldom speaks
at all, and never well; consequently you need be a stranger
nowhere. This is the way, and the only way, of having 'du monde',
but if you have it not, and have still any coarse rusticity about
you, may not one apply to you the 'rusticus expectat' of
Horace?
This knowledge of the world teaches us more
particularly two things, both which are of infinite consequence,
and to neither of which nature inclines us; I mean, the command of
our temper, and of our countenance. A man who has no 'monde' is
inflamed with anger, or annihilated with shame, at every
disagreeable incident: the one makes him act and talk like a
madman, the other makes him look like a fool. But a man who has 'du
monde', seems not to understand what he cannot or ought not to
resent. If he makes a slip himself, he recovers it by his coolness,
instead of plunging deeper by his confusion like a stumbling horse.
He is firm, but gentle; and practices that most excellent maxim,
'suaviter in modo, fortiter in re'. The other is the 'volto sciolto
a pensieri stretti'. People unused to the world have babbling
countenances; and are unskillful enough to show what they have
sense enough not to tell. In the course of the world, a man must
very often put on an easy, frank countenance, upon very
disagreeable occasions; he must seem pleased when he is very much
otherwise; he must be able to accost and receive with smiles, those
whom he would much rather meet with swords. In courts he must not
turn himself inside out. All this may, nay must be done, without
falsehood and treachery; for it must go no further than politeness
and manners, and must stop short of assurances and professions of
simulated friendship. Good manners, to those one does not love, are
no more a breach of truth, than "your humble servant" at the bottom
of a challenge is; they are universally agreed upon and understood,
to be things of course. They are necessary guards of the decency
and peace of society; they must only act defensively; and then not
with arms poisoned by perfidy. Truth, but not the whole truth, must
be the invariable principle of every man, who hath either religion,
honor, or prudence. Those who violate it may be cunning, but they
are not able. Lies and perfidy are the refuge of fools and cowards.
Adieu!
P. S. I must recommend to you again, to take
your leave of all your French acquaintance, in such a manner as may
make them regret your departure, and wish to see and welcome you at
Paris again, where you may possibly return before it is very long.
This must not be done in a cold, civil manner, but with at least
seeming warmth, sentiment, and concern. Acknowledge the obligations
you have to them for the kindness they have shown you during your
stay at Paris: assure them that wherever you are, you will remember
them with gratitude; wish for opportunities of giving them proofs
of your 'plus tendre et respectueux souvenir; beg of them in case
your good fortune should carry them to any part of the world where
you could be of any the least use to them, that they would employ
you without reserve. Say all this, and a great deal more,
emphatically and pathetically; for you know 'si vis me flere'. This
can do you no harm, if you never return to Paris; but if you do, as
probably you may, it will be of infinite use to you. Remember too,
not to omit going to every house where you have ever been once, to
take leave and recommend yourself to their remembrance. The
reputation which you leave at one place, where you have been, will
circulate, and you will meet with it at twenty places where you are
to go. That is a labor never quite lost.
This letter will show you, that the accident
which happened to me yesterday, and of which Mr. Grevenkop gives
you account, hath had no bad consequences. My escape was a great
one.
LETTER
CLXVI
LONDON, May 11, O.
S. 1752.
DEAR FRIEND: I break my word by writing this
letter; but I break it on the allowable side, by doing more than I
promised. I have pleasure in writing to you; and you may possibly
have some profit in reading what I write; either of the motives
were sufficient for me, both for you I cannot withstand. By your
last I calculate that you will leave Paris upon this day se'nnight;
upon that supposition, this letter may still find you there.
Colonel Perry arrived here two or three days
ago, and sent me a book from you; Cassandra abridged. I am sure it
cannot be too much abridged. The spirit of that most voluminous
work, fairly extracted, may be contained in the smallest duodecimo;
and it is most astonishing, that there ever could have been people
idle enough to write or read such endless heaps of the same stuff.
It was, however, the occupation of thousands in the last century,
and is still the private, though disavowed, amusement of young
girls, and sentimental ladies. A lovesick girl finds, in the
captain with whom she is in love, all the courage and all the
graces of the tender and accomplished Oroondates: and many a
grown-up, sentimental lady, talks delicate Clelia to the hero, whom
she would engage to eternal love, or laments with her that love is
not eternal.
"Ah! qu'il est doux d'aimer, si Pon aimoit
toujours!
Mais helas! il'n'est point d'eternelles
amours."
It is, however, very well to have read one
of those extravagant works (of all which La Calprenede's are the
best), because it is well to be able to talk, with some degree of
knowledge, upon all those subjects that other people talk sometimes
upon: and I would by no means have anything, that is known to
others, be totally unknown to you. It is a great advantage for any
man, to be able to talk or to hear, neither ignorantly nor
absurdly, upon any subject; for I have known people, who have not
said one word, hear ignorantly and absurdly; it has appeared in
their inattentive and unmeaning faces.
This, I think, is as little likely to happen
to you as to anybody of your age: and if you will but add a
versatility and easy conformity of manners, I know no company in
which you are likely to be de trop.
This versatility is more particularly
necessary for you at this time, now that you are going to so many
different places: for, though the manners and customs of the
several courts of Germany are in general the same, yet everyone has
its particular characteristic; some peculiarity or other, which
distinguishes it from the next. This you should carefully attend
to, and immediately adopt. Nothing flatters people more, nor makes
strangers so welcome, as such an occasional conformity. I do not
mean by this, that you should mimic the air and stiffness of every
awkward German court; no, by no means; but I mean that you should
only cheerfully comply, and fall in with certain local habits, such
as ceremonies, diet, turn of conversation, etc. People who are
lately come from Paris, and who have been a good while there, are
generally suspected, and especially in Germany, of having a degree
of contempt for every other place. Take great care that nothing of
this kind appear, at least outwardly, in your behavior; but commend
whatever deserves any degree of commendation, without comparing it
with what you may have left, much better of the same kind, at
Paris. As for instance, the German kitchen is, without doubt,
execrable, and the French delicious; however, never commend the
French kitchen at a German table; but eat of what you can find
tolerable there, and commend it, without comparing it to anything
better. I have known many British Yahoos, who though while they
were at Paris conformed to no one French custom, as soon as they
got anywhere else, talked of nothing but what they did, saw, and
eat at Paris. The freedom of the French is not to be used
indiscriminately at all the courts in Germany, though their
easiness may, and ought; but that, too, at some places more than
others. The courts of Manheim and Bonn, I take to be a little more
unbarbarized than some others; that of Mayence, an ecclesiastical
one, as well as that of Treves (neither of which is much frequented
by foreigners), retains, I conceive, a great deal of the Goth and
Vandal still. There, more reserve and ceremony are necessary; and
not a word of the French. At Berlin, you cannot be too French.
Hanover, Brunswick, Cassel, etc., are of the mixed kind, 'un peu
decrottes, mais pas assez'.
Another thing, which I most earnestly
recommend to you, not only in Germany, but in every part of the
world where you may ever be, is not only real, but seeming
attention, to whoever you speak to, or to whoever speaks to you.
There is nothing so brutally shocking, nor so little forgiven, as a
seeming inattention to the person who is speaking to you: and I
have known many a man knocked down, for (in my opinion) a much
lighter provocation, than that shocking inattention which I mean. I
have seen many people, who, while you are speaking to them, instead
of looking at, and attending to you, fix their eyes upon the
ceiling or some other part of the room, look out of the window,
play with a dog, twirl their snuff-box, or pick their nose. Nothing
discovers a little, futile, frivolous mind more than this, and
nothing is so offensively ill-bred; it is an explicit declaration
on your part, that every the most trifling object, deserves your
attention more than all that can be said by the person who is
speaking to you. Judge of the sentiments of hatred and resentment,
which such treatment must excite in every breast where any degree
of self-love dwells; and I am sure I never yet met with that breast
where there was not a great deal: I repeat it again and again (for
it is highly necessary for you to remember it), that sort of vanity
and self-love is inseparable from human nature, whatever may be its
rank or condition; even your footmen will sooner forget and forgive
a beating, than any manifest mark of slight and contempt. Be
therefore, I beg of you, not only really, but seemingly and
manifestly attentive to whoever speaks to you; nay, more, take
their 'ton', and tune yourself to their unison. Be serious with the
serious, gay with the gay, and trifle with the triflers. In
assuming these various shapes, endeavor to make each of them seem
to sit easy upon you, and even to appear to be your own natural
one. This is the true and useful versatility, of which a thorough
knowledge of the world at once teaches the utility and the means of
acquiring.
I am very sure, at least I hope, that you
will never make use of a silly expression, which is the favorite
expression, and the absurd excuse of all fools and blockheads; I
CANNOT DO SUCH A THING; a thing by no means either morally or
physically impossible. I CANNOT attend long together to the same
thing, says one fool; that is, he is such a fool that he will not.
I remember a very awkward fellow, who did not know what to do with
his sword, and who always took it off before dinner, saying that he
could not possibly dine with his sword on; upon which I could not
help telling him, that I really believed he could without any
probable danger either to himself or others. It is a shame and an
absurdity, for any man to say that he cannot do all those things,
which are commonly done by all the rest of mankind.
Another thing that I must earnestly warn you
against is laziness; by which more people have lost the fruit of
their travels than, perhaps, by any other thing. Pray be always in
motion. Early in the morning go and see things; and the rest of the
day go and see people. If you stay but a week at a place, and that
an insignificant one, see, however, all that is to be seen there;
know as many people, and get into as many houses, as ever you
can.
I recommend to you likewise, though probably
you have thought of it yourself, to carry in your pocket a map of
Germany, in which the postroads are marked; and also some short
book of travels through Germany. The former will help to imprint in
your memory situations and distances; and the latter will point out
many things for you to see, that might otherwise possibly escape
you, and which, though they may be in themselves of little
consequence, you would regret not having seen, after having been at
the places where they were.
Thus warned and provided for your journey,
God speed you; 'Felix faustumque sit! Adieu.
LETTER
CLXVII
LONDON, May 27, O.
S. 1752
MY DEAR FRIEND: I send you the inclosed
original from a friend of ours, with my own commentaries upon the
text; a text which I have so often paraphrased, and commented upon
already, that I believe I can hardly say anything new upon it; but,
however, I cannot give it over till I am better convinced, than I
yet am, that you feel all the utility, the importance, and the
necessity of it; nay, not only feel, but practice it. Your
panegyrist allows you, what most fathers would be more than
satisified with, in a son, and chides me for not contenting myself
with 'l'essentiellement bon'; but I, who have been in no one
respect like other fathers, cannot neither, like them, content
myself with 'l'essentiellement bon'; because I know that it will
not do your business in the world, while you want 'quelques couches
de vernis'. Few fathers care much for their sons, or, at least,
most of them care more for their money: and, consequently, content
themselves with giving them, at the cheapest rate, the common run
of education: that is, a school till eighteen; the university till
twenty; and a couple of years riding post through the several towns
of Europe; impatient till their boobies come home to be married,
and, as they call it, settled. Of those who really love their sons,
few know how to do it. Some spoil them by fondling them while they
are young, and then quarrel with them when they are grown up, for
having been spoiled; some love them like mothers, and attend only
to the bodily health and strength of the hopes of their family,
solemnize his birthday, and rejoice, like the subjects of the Great
Mogul, at the increase of his bulk; while others, minding, as they
think, only essentials, take pains and pleasure to see in their
heir, all their favorite weaknesses and imperfections. I hope and
believe that I have kept clear of all of these errors in the
education which I have given you. No weaknesses of my own have
warped it, no parsimony has starved it, no rigor has deformed it.
Sound and extensive learning was the foundation which I meant to
lay-I have laid it; but that alone, I knew, would by no means be
sufficient: the ornamental, the showish, the pleasing
superstructure was to be begun. In that view, I threw you into the
great world, entirely your own master, at an age when others either
guzzle at the university, or are sent abroad in servitude to some
awkward, pedantic Scotch governor. This was to put you in the way,
and the only way of acquiring those manners, that address, and
those graces, which exclusively distinguish people of fashion; and
without which all moral virtues, and all acquired learning, are of
no sort of use in the courts and 'le beau monde': on the contrary,
I am not sure if they are not an hindrance. They are feared and
disliked in those places, as too severe, if not smoothed and
introduced by the graces; but of these graces, of this necessary
'beau vernis', it seems there are still 'quelque couches qui
manquent'. Now, pray let me ask you, coolly and seriously,
'pourquoi ces couches manquent-elles'? For you may as easily take
them, as you may wear more or less powder in your hair, more or
less lace upon your coat. I can therefore account for your wanting
them no other way in the world, than from your not being yet
convinced of their full value. You have heard some English bucks
say, "Damn these finical outlandish airs, give me a manly, resolute
manner. They make a rout with their graces, and talk like a parcel
of dancing-masters, and dress like a parcel of fops: one good
Englishman will beat three of them." But let your own observation
undeceive you of these prejudices. I will give you one instance
only, instead of an hundred that I could give you, of a very
shining fortune and figure, raised upon no other foundation
whatsoever, than that of address, manners, and graces. Between you
and me (for this example must go no further), what do you think
made our friend, Lord A--e, Colonel of a regiment of guards,
Governor of Virginia, Groom of the Stole, and Ambassador to Paris;
amounting in all to sixteen or seventeen thousand pounds a year?
Was it his birth? No, a Dutch gentleman only. Was it his estate?
No, he had none. Was it his learning, his parts, his political
abilities and application? You can answer these questions as
easily, and as soon, as I can ask them. What was it then? Many
people wondered, but I do not; for I know, and will tell you. It
was his air, his address, his manners, and his graces. He pleased,
and by pleasing he became a favorite; and by becoming a favorite
became all that he has been since. Show me any one instance, where
intrinsic worth and merit, unassisted by exterior accomplishments,
have raised any man so high. You know the Due de Richelieu, now
'Marechal, Cordon bleu, Gentilhomme de la Chambre', twice
Ambassador, etc. By what means? Not by the purity of his character,
the depth of his knowledge, or any uncommon penetration and
sagacity. Women alone formed and raised him. The Duchess of
Burgundy took a fancy to him, and had him before he was sixteen
years old; this put him in fashion among the beau monde: and the
late Regent's oldest daughter, now Madame de Modene, took him next,
and was near marrying him. These early connections with women of
the first distinction gave him those manners, graces, and address,
which you see he has; and which, I can assure you, are all that he
has; for, strip him of them, and he will be one of the poorest men
in Europe. Man or woman cannot resist an engaging exterior; it will
please, it will make its way. You want, it seems, but 'quelques
couches'; for God's sake, lose no time in getting them; and now you
have gone so far, complete the work. Think of nothing else till
that work is finished; unwearied application will bring about
anything: and surely your application can never be so well employed
as upon that object, which is absolutely necessary to facilitate
all others. With your knowledge and parts, if adorned by manners
and graces, what may you not hope one day to be? But without them,
you will be in the situation of a man who should be very fleet of
one leg but very lame of the other. He could not run; the lame leg
would check and clog the well one, which would be very near
useless.
From my original plan for your education, I
meant to make you 'un homme universel'; what depends on me is
executed, the little that remains undone depends singly upon you.
Do not then disappoint, when you can so easily gratify me. It is
your own interest which I am pressing you to pursue, and it is the
only return that I desire for all the care and affection of,
Yours.
LETTER
CLXVIII
LONDON, May 31, O.
S. 1752
MY DEAR FRIEND: The world is the book, and
the only one to which, at present, I would have you apply yourself;
and the thorough knowledge of it will be of more use to you, than
all the books that ever were read. Lay aside the best book whenever
you can go into the best company; and depend upon it, you change
for the better. However, as the most tumultuous life, whether of
business or pleasure, leaves some vacant moments every day, in
which a book is the refuge of a rational being, I mean now to point
out to you the method of employing those moments (which will and
ought to be but few) in the most advantageous manner. Throw away
none of your time upon those trivial, futile books, published by
idle or necessitous authors, for the amusement of idle and ignorant
readers; such sort of books swarm and buzz about one every day;
flap them away, they have no sting. 'Certum pete finem', have some
one object for those leisure moments, and pursue that object
invariably till you have attained it; and then take some other. For
instance, considering your destination, I would advise you to
single out the most remarkable and interesting eras of modern
history, and confine all your reading to that ERA. If you pitch
upon the Treaty of Munster (and that is the proper period to begin
with, in the course which I am now recommending), do not interrupt
it by dipping and deviating into other books, unrelative to it; but
consult only the most authentic histories, letters, memoirs, and
negotiations, relative to that great transaction; reading and
comparing them, with all that caution and distrust which Lord
Bolingbroke recommends to you, in a better manner, and in better
words than I can. The next period worth your particular knowledge,
is the Treaty of the Pyrenees: which was calculated to lay, and in
effect did lay, the succession of the House of Bourbon to the crown
of Spain. Pursue that in the same manner, singling, out of the
millions of volumes written upon that occasion, the two or three
most authentic ones, and particularly letters, which are the best
authorities in matters of negotiation. Next come the Treaties of
Nimeguen and Ryswick, postscripts in, a manner to those of Munster
and the Pyrenees. Those two transactions have had great light
thrown upon them by the publication of many authentic and original
letters and pieces. The concessions made at the Treaty of Ryswick,
by the then triumphant Lewis the Fourteenth, astonished all those
who viewed things only superficially; but, I should think, must
have been easily accounted for by those who knew the state of the
kingdom of Spain, as well as of the health of its King, Charles the
Second, at that time. The interval between the conclusion of the
peace of Ryswick, and the breaking out of the great war in 1702,
though a short, is a most interesting one. Every week of it almost
produced some great event. Two partition treaties, the death of the
King of Spain, his unexpected will, and the acceptance of it by
Lewis the Fourteenth, in violation of the second treaty of
partition, just signed and ratified by him. Philip the Fifth
quietly and cheerfully received in Spain, and acknowledged as King
of it, by most of those powers, who afterward joined in an alliance
to dethrone him. I cannot help making this observation upon that
occasion: That character has often more to do in great
transactions, than prudence and sound policy; for Lewis the
Fourteenth gratified his personal pride, by giving a Bourbon King
to Spain, at the expense of the true interest of France; which
would have acquired much more solid and permanent strength by the
addition of Naples, Sicily, and Lorraine, upon the footing of the
second partition treaty; and I think it was fortunate for Europe
that he preferred the will. It is true, he might hope to influence
his Bourbon posterity in Spain; he knew too well how weak the ties
of blood are among men, and how much weaker still they are among
princes. The Memoirs of Count Harrach, and of Las Torres, give a
good deal of light into the transactions of the Court of Spain,
previous to the death of that weak King; and the Letters of the
Marachal d'Harcourt, then the French Ambassador in Spain, of which
I have authentic copies in manuscript, from the year 1698 to 1701,
have cleared up that whole affair to me. I keep that book for you.
It appears by those letters, that the impudent conduct of the House
of Austria, with regard to the King and Queen of Spain, and Madame
Berlips, her favorite, together with the knowledge of the partition
treaty, which incensed all Spain, were the true and only reasons of
the will, in favor of the Duke of Anjou. Cardinal Portocarrero, nor
any of the Grandees, were bribed by France, as was generally
reported and believed at that time; which confirms Voltaire's
anecdote upon that subject. Then opens a new scene and a new
century; Lewis the Fourteenth's good fortune forsakes him, till the
Duke of Marlborough and Prince Eugene make him amends for all the
mischief they had done him, by making the allies refuse the terms
of peace offered by him at Gertruydenberg. How the disadvantageous
peace of Utrecht was afterward brought on, you have lately read;
and you cannot inform yourself too minutely of all those
circumstances, that treaty 'being the freshest source from whence
the late transactions of Europe have flowed. The alterations that
have since happened, whether by wars or treaties, are so recent,
that all the written accounts are to be helped out, proved, or
contradicted, by the oral ones of almost every informed person, of
a certain age or rank in life. For the facts, dates, and original
pieces of this century, you will find them in Lamberti, till the
year 1715, and after that time in Rousset's 'Recueil'.
I do not mean that you should plod hours
together in researches of this kind: no, you may employ your time
more usefully: but I mean, that you should make the most of the
moments you do employ, by method, and the pursuit of one single
object at a time; nor should I call it a digression from that
object, if when you meet with clashing and jarring pretensions of
different princes to the same thing, you had immediately recourse
to other books, in which those several pretensions were clearly
stated; on the contrary, that is the only way of remembering those
contested rights and claims: for, were a man to read 'tout de
suite', Schwederus's 'Theatrum Pretensionum', he would only be
confounded by the variety, and remember none of them; whereas, by
examining them occasionally, as they happen to occur, either in the
course of your historical reading, or as they are agitated in your
own times, you will retain them, by connecting them with those
historical facts which occasioned your inquiry. For example, had
you read, in the course of two or three folios of Pretensions,
those, among others, of the two Kings of England and Prussia to
Oost Frise, it is impossible, that you should have remembered them;
but now, that they are become the debated object at the Diet at
Ratisbon, and the topic of all political conversations, if you
consult both books and persons concerning them, and inform yourself
thoroughly, you will never forget them as long as you live. You
will hear a great deal of them ow one side, at Hanover, and as much
on the other side, afterward, at Berlin: hear both sides, and form
your own opinion; but dispute with neither.
Letters from foreign ministers to their
courts, and from their courts to them, are, if genuine, the best
and most authentic records you can read, as far as they go.
Cardinal d'Ossat's, President Jeanin's, D'Estrade's, Sir William
Temple's, will not only inform your mind, but form your style;
which, in letters of business, should be very plain and simple,
but, at the same time, exceedingly clear, correct, and pure.
All that I have said may be reduced to these
two or three plain principles: 1st, That you should now read very
little, but converse a great deal; 2d, To read no useless,
unprofitable books; and 3d, That those which you do read, may all
tend to a certain object, and be relative to, and consequential of
each other. In this method, half an hour's reading every day will
carry you a great way. People seldom know how to employ their time
to the best advantage till they have too little left to employ; but
if, at your age, in the beginning of life, people would but
consider the value of it, and put every moment to interest, it is
incredible what an additional fund of knowledge and pleasure such
an economy would bring in. I look back with regret upon that large
sum of time, which, in my youth, I lavished away idly, without
either improvement or pleasure. Take warning betimes, and enjoy
every moment; pleasures do not commonly last so long as life, and
therefore should not be neglected; and the longest life is too
short for knowledge, consequently every moment is precious.
I am surprised at having received no letter
from you since you left Paris. I still direct this to Strasburgh,
as I did my two last. I shall direct my next to the post house at
Mayence, unless I receive, in the meantime, contrary instructions
from you. Adieu. Remember les attentions: they must be your
passports into good company.
LETTER
CLXIX
LONDON, June, O. S.
1752.
MY DEAR FRIEND: Very few celebrated
negotiators have been eminent for their learning. The most famous
French negotiators (and I know no nation that can boast of abler)
have been military men, as Monsieur d'Harcourt, Comte d'Estrades,
Marechal d'Uxelles, and others. The late Duke of Marlborough, who
was at least as able a negotiator as a general, was exceedingly
ignorant of books, but extremely knowing in men, whereas the
learned Grotius appeared, both in Sweden and in France, to be a
very bungling minister. This is, in my opinion, very easily to be
accounted for. A man of very deep learning must have employed the
greatest part of his time in books; and a skillful negotiator must
necessarily have employed much the greater part of his time with
man. The sound scholar, when dragged out of his dusty closet into
business, acts by book, and deals with men as he has read of them;
not as he has known them by experience: he follows Spartan and
Roman precedents, in what he falsely imagines to be similar cases;
whereas two cases never were, since the beginning of the world,
exactly alike; and he would be capable, where he thought spirit and
vigor necessary, to draw a circle round the persons he treated
with, and to insist upon a categorical answer before they went out
of it, because he had read, in the Roman history, that once upon a
time some Roman ambassador, did so. No; a certain degree of
learning may help, but no degree of learning will ever make a
skillful minister whereas a great knowledge of the world, of the
characters, passions, and habits of mankind, has, without one grain
of learning, made a thousand. Military men have seldom much
knowledge of books; their education does not allow it; but what
makes great amends for that want is, that they generally know a
great deal of the world; they are thrown into it young; they see
variety of nations and characters; and they soon find, that to
rise, which is the aim of them all, they must first please: these
concurrent causes almost always give them manners and politeness.
In consequence of which, you see them always distinguished at
courts, and favored by the women. I could wish that you had been of
an age to have made a campaign or two as a volunteer. It would have
given you an attention, a versatility, and an alertness; all which
I doubt you want; and a great want it is.
A foreign minister has not great business to
transact every day; so that his knowledge and his skill in
negotiating are not frequently put to the trial; but he has that to
do every day, and every hour of the day, which is necessary to
prepare and smooth the way for his business; that is, to insinuate
himself by his manners, not only into the houses, but into the
confidence of the most considerable people of that place; to
contribute to their pleasures, and insensibly not to be looked upon
as a stranger himself. A skillful minister may very possibly be
doing his master's business full as well, in doing the honors
gracefully and genteelly of a ball or a supper, as if he were
laboriously writing a protocol in his closet. The Marechal
d'Harcourt, by his magnificence, his manners, and his politeness,
blunted the edge of the long aversion which the Spaniards had to
the French. The court and the grandees were personally fond, of
him, and frequented his house; and were at least insensibly brought
to prefer a French to a German yoke; which I am convinced would
never have happened, had Comte d'Harrach been Marechal d'Harcourt,
or the Marechal d'Harcourt Comte d'Harrach. The Comte d'Estrades
had, by 'ses manieres polies et liantes', formed such connections,
and gained such an interest in the republic of the United
Provinces, that Monsieur De Witt, the then Pensionary of Holland,
often applied to him to use his interest with his friend, both in
Holland and the other provinces, whenever he (De Witt) had a
difficult point which he wanted to carry. This was certainly not
brought about by his knowledge of books, but of men: dancing,
fencing, and riding, with a little military architecture, were no
doubt the top of his education; and if he knew that 'collegium' in
Latin signified college in French, it must have been by accident.
But he knew what was more useful: from thirteen years old he had
been in the great world, and had read men and women so long, that
he could then read them at sight.
Talking the other day, upon this and other
subjects, all relative to you, with one who knows and loves you
very well, and expressing my anxiety and wishes that your exterior
accomplishments, as a man of fashion, might adorn, and at least
equal your intrinsic merit as a man of sense and honor, the person
interrupted me, and said: Set your heart at rest; that never will
or can happen. It is not in character; that gentleness, that
'douceur', those attentions which you wish him to have, are not in
his nature; and do what you will, nay, let him do what he will, he
can never acquire them. Nature may be a little disguised and
altered by care; but can by no means whatsoever be totally forced
and changed. I denied this principle to a certain degree; but
admitting, however, that in many respects our nature was not to be
changed; and asserting, at the same time, that in others it might
by care be very much altered and improved, so as in truth to be
changed; that I took those exterior accomplishments, which we had
been talking of, to be mere modes, and absolutely depending upon
the will, and upon custom; and that, therefore, I was convinced
that your good sense, which must show you the importance of them,
would make you resolve at all events to acquire them, even in spite
of nature, if nature be in the case. Our dispute, which lasted a
great while, ended as Voltaire observes that disputes in England
are apt to do, in a wager of fifty guineas; which I myself am to
decide upon honor, and of which this is a faithful copy. If you
think I shall win it, you may go my halves if you please; declare
yourself in time. This I declare, that I would most cheerfully give
a thousand guineas to win those fifty; you may secure them me if
you please.
I grow very impatient for your future
letters from the several courts of Manheim, Bonn, Hanover, etc. And
I desire that your letters may be to me, what I do not desire they
should be to anybody else, I mean full of yourself. Let the
egotism, a figure which upon all other occasions I detest, be your
only one to me. Trifles that concern you are not trifles to me; and
my knowledge of them may possibly be useful to you. Adieu. 'Les
graces, les graces, les graces'.
LETTER
CLXX
LONDON, June 23, O.
S. 1752
MY DEAR FRIEND: I direct this letter to
Mayence, where I think it is likely to meet you, supposing, as I
do, that you stayed three weeks at Manheim, after the date of your
last from thence; but should you have stayed longer at Manheim, to
which I have no objection, it will wait for you at Mayence. Mayence
will not, I believe, have charms to detain you above a week; so
that I reckon you will be at Bonn at the end of July, N. S. There
you may stay just as little or as long as you please, and then
proceed to Hanover.
I had a letter by the last post from a
relation of mine at Hanover, Mr. Stanhope Aspinwall, who is in the
Duke of Newcastle's office, and has lately been appointed the
King's Minister to the Dey of Algiers; a post which,
notwithstanding your views of foreign affairs, I believe you do not
envy him. He tells me in that letter, there are very good lodgings
to be had at one Mrs. Meyers's, the next door to the Duke of
Newcastle's, which he offers to take for you; I have desired him to
do it, in case Mrs. Meyers will wait for you till the latter end of
August, or the beginning of September, N. S., which I suppose is
about the time when you will be at Hanover. You will find this Mr.
Aspinwall of great use to you there. He will exert himself to the
utmost to serve you; he has been twice or thrice at Hanover, and
knows all the allures there: he is very well with the Duke of
Newcastle, and will puff you there. Moreover, if you have a mind to
work there as a volunteer in that bureau, he will assist and inform
you. In short, he is a very honest, sensible, and informed man;
'mais me paye pas beaucoup de sa figure; il abuse meme du privilege
qu'ont les hommes d'etre laids; et il ne sera pas en reste avec les
lions et les leopards qu'il trouvera a Alger'.
As you are entirely master of the time when
you will leave Bonn and go to Hanover, so are you master to stay at
Hanover as long as you please, and to go from thence where you
please; provided that at Christmas you are at Berlin, for the
beginning of the Carnival: this I would not have you say at
Hanover, considering the mutual disposition of those two courts;
but when anybody asks you where you are to go next, say that you
propose rambling in Germany, at Brunswick, Cassel, etc., till the
next spring; when you intend to be in Flanders, in your way to
England. I take Berlin, at this time, to be the politest, the most
shining, and the most useful court in Europe for a young fellow to
be at: and therefore I would upon no account not have you there,
for at least a couple of months of the Carnival. If you are as well
received, and pass your time as well at Bonn as I believe you will,
I would advise you to remain there till about the 20th of August,
N. S., in four days you will be at Hanover. As for your stay there,
it must be shorter or longer, according to certain circumstances
WHICH YOU KNOW OF; supposing them, at the best, then, stay within a
week or ten days of the King's return to England; but supposing
them at the worst, your stay must not be too short, for reasons
which you also know; no resentment must either appear or be
suspected; therefore, at worst, I think you must remain there a
month, and at best, as long as ever you please. But I am convinced
that all will turn out very well for you there. Everybody is
engaged or inclined to help you; the ministers, English and German,
the principal ladies, and most of the foreign ministers; so that I
may apply to you, 'nullum numen abest, si sit prudentia'. Du Perron
will, I believe, be back there from Turin much about the time you
get there: pray be very attentive to him, and connect yourself with
him as much as ever you can; for, besides that he is a very pretty
and well-informed man, he is very much in fashion at Hanover, is
personally very well with the King and certain ladies; so that a
visible intimacy and connection with him will do you credit and
service. Pray cultivate Monsieur Hop, the Dutch minister, who has
always been very much my friend, and will, I am sure, be yours; his
manners, it is true, are not very engaging; he is rough, but he is
sincere. It is very useful sometimes to see the things which one
ought to avoid, as it is right to see very often those which one
ought to imitate, and my friend Hop's manners will frequently point
out to you, what yours ought to be by the rule of contraries.