Is Harry’s Story About Religion?
136
IN AN INTERVIEW AFTER THE PUBLICATION OF 
the seventh and final volume of the series, Rowling acknowledged that Harry’s story has a “religious undertone.” “It’s always been difficult to talk about that,” she said, because to explain her “views of what happens after death and so on would [have given] away a lot of what was coming.” But, she added, “My belief and my struggling with religious belief I think is quite apparent in this book.”
She’s right: The final book leaves no doubt that religion is important to the series; but it’s a view of religion that’s full of doubt.

LOVE THY NEIGHBOR

It shouldn’t be a surprise that Rowling’s religion, Christianity, is tied into Harry’s story. Rowling has made references to so many other cultures that it would have been odd to exclude her own.
“My struggle is to keep believing.” —J. K. Rowling
Author Judy Blume in 1999, shortly after Harry Potter was first banned: “I knew this was coming . . . If children are excited about a book, it must be suspect.I’m not exactly unfamiliar with this line of thinking, having had various books of mine banned from schools over the last twenty years. In my books, it’s reality that’s seen as corrupting. With Harry Potter, the perceived danger is fantasy.”
For a while, a lot of attention was paid to some people who claimed the books were anti-Christian. Those attacks were never believable. The loudest critics seemed to know the least about the books.
Rowling, when asked by the media, always described herself as Christian. But she refused to link her faith to the story. She told one reporter, “Every time I’ve been asked if I believe in God, I’ve said yes, because I do, but no one ever really has gone any more deeply into it than that, and I have to say that does suit me, because if I talk too freely about that I think the intelligent reader, whether ten or sixty, will be able to guess what’s coming in the books.” She meant some readers would have guessed that the story would end like the Bible story of Jesus: instead of fighting his enemy, Jesus allows himself to die so that he can save humankind from its sins, and after dying he comes back to life. That’s similar to what happens at the end of Hallows: Harry chooses not to fight Voldemort but to sacrifice himself, then he seems to die and come back to life, and finally offers Voldemort mercy despite Voldemort’s past sins.
As it happened, many readers noticed the clues in the earlier books and guessed ahead. In fact, long before the final book was published, some readers were claiming that everything in the Harry Potter books is Christian.
That’s stretching it. The truth seems to be somewhere between the two extremes. The story borrows many important elements from Christianity—elements that Christianity happens to have in common with many religions. But in the end, Rowling’s personal beliefs, which seem to be different in some ways, prove most important.

STAG KNIGHT

Christian symbols certainly appear all through the story. For example, Harry’s father is symbolized by a stag, a classic emblem of Jesus, and his mother by a female version of the same symbol, a silver doe. These are just two of many intentional allusions. Just as the story ends with Harry’s sacrifice in Hallows, it begins with a similar event that took place long before. Harry’s mother sacrifices herself to save Harry, an act that creates a supernatural power. In Chamber, Harry tells Voldemort, “You couldn’t kill me . . . because my mother died to save me.”
Yet these symbols and storylines aren’t unique to Christianity. C. S. Lewis, whose Chronicles of Narnia were meant to have a direct symbolic connection to the Christian
In chapter 19 of Hallows, Harry follows the silver doe into the forest, where it leads him to “a great silver cross,” which he realizes is the hilt of the sword of Gryffindor. An established motif in folktales is for the hero to be led by a stag to a divine place, or to Christianity itself.
Cernunnos, in a detail from an ancient carving. His name comes from early Celtic. It means “the great horned one.”
gospels, liked to point out similarities between Christianity and pagan religions that appeared long before Christ. For example, before the stag became a symbol of Christianity, Celts across Europe worshipped the stag-god Cernunnos. Examples of others like him are found elsewhere. Cernunnos also happens to be one of dozens of gods from all over the world who die and are reborn each year, giving new life to worshippers. Those rites of spring were universal long before the first Easter. Lewis also liked to remind his readers that the ethical philosophy of Christianity was not new: Love and mercy and sacrifice and devotion to God were all ancient ideas even in Christ’s lifetime.
Of course, Rowling doesn’t go to church to worship the stag-god Cernunnos. To her, the story is connected to Christianity. The many elements of Christianity she put in the books are clearly more important to the story’s themes than the fun allusions to Shakespeare and Greek mythology. It’s no accident that “King’s Cross” is the title of the chapter in which Harry enters what Rowling calls “a kind of limbo between life and death.” Rowling is making an allusion to passages in the Bible that refer to Jesus as the “King of Kings,” and to Jesus dying on the cross. Dumbledore’s gravestone is a direct quotation from the New Testament, “Where your treasure is, there will your heart be also” (Matthew 6:21).
But for all these allusions, Rowling doesn’t seem to share Lewis’s degree of faith.

REVERSE PSYCHOLOGY

Harry’s final confrontation with Voldemort is a good example of both Rowling’s belief and her struggle to believe. Harry defeats Voldemort with an action meant to remind us of Christ on the cross, and returns to life as Jesus does in the Bible. In a neat plot twist, Voldemort’s plan goes wrong because he has previously used Harry’s blood to resurrect himself. To a Christian reader, Voldemort may have defeated himself by receiving the Christian sacrament, the symbolic blood of Jesus that is part of some Christian rituals. But then, instead of quickly becoming divine like Jesus in the gospels, Harry remians a regular teenage wizard. Rowling recreates the miracle that’s at the center of her religion, and just as quickly deflates it. Harry’s not Jesus.
Rowling has left out of the series the central idea in Christianity: the matter of who or what is sacred. In Christianity, it’s not enough to follow the ethical rules. Without faith in Christ’s personal role as savior, it’s impossible
An exchange in Hallows between Hermione and Xenophilius Lovegood is meant as a defense of religious faith. Hermione insists the Resurrection Stone can’t be real. Resurrection isn’t logical. Prove it, he challenges her. Hermione objects that it’s impossible to prove something can’t exist. “I am glad to see that you are opening your mind a little,” says Xenophilius. For a moment, he’s C. S. Lewis!
J. K. Rowling is known for playing with words to create names. Did “Evans,” the maiden name of Harry’s mother, come from a rearrangement of the letters in Rowling’s mother’s name, Anne V. Rowling?
to be saved. That’s the opposite of the lesson in the Harry Potter series. Harry doesn’t want other wizards to put their faith in him personally. For himself, he learns not to have too much faith in Dumbledore and Sirius. There’s no talk about devotion to a higher authority, or of making himself into that authority. God doesn’t make a sudden appearance.

MOTHER KNOWS BEST

There is someone in the story who comes close to divine perfection, yet the choice Rowling made there also seems more personal than traditional.
Of all the characters in the books, including Harry, only Lily Potter seems to deserve idolatry. She’s essentially a Madonna figure, the Virgin Mary, mother of Jesus. Mary is revered in many Christian sects and in Islam. She’s held up as an ideal. She’s favored by God. Her compassion gives strength to many who revere her. These same qualities are mentioned when characters in Harry’s story mention Lily.
Rowling herself seems to feel the same way. Lily is the only important character who isn’t brought down to a human level in the course of the story. Harry’s father had his moments of cruelty. Dumbledore too. Sirius Black mistreated Kreacher. Harry himself is no saint, as Rowling has said many times.
It’s this mother figure who saves Harry and who could have saved Voldemort. When Voldemort used Harry’s blood to resurrect himself, he also took into himself Lily’s powerful, protective magic. “Voldemort,” said Rowling in an interview, “did have a chance at redemption because he had taken into his body this drop of hope or love.” It’s a sacrament, but not a traditionally Christian one. This same mother figure is reason Snape and Harry are reconciled. Harry and Snape are one in their adoration of her.
Is it an accident that Rowling has elevated the most sacred female in the Bible story? Probably not, given the sense of equality she brings to other aspects of the story. It’s easy to imagine she might have some issues with the abundance of male figures in organized Christianity. Her reverence for her own mother may also be an influence.

“MY BELIEF AND MY STRUGGLING”

Questions that we consider religious are at the heart of the series. Harry wonders: Why must I suffer? Are my dead parents still alive in heaven? Does justice exist, or is it a winner
Study of the Virgin Mary is so extensive it has its own name, “Mariology.” It’s a complicated discipline that sometimes separates Protestants and Catholics. Some Protestants are uncomfortable with the veneration of Mary in the Catholic church, which Catholics believe is misunderstood.
See also: Voldemort
takes-all world? Can mercy and love really defeat violent evil?
For Rowling, many of the answers come from her religion. Not all. There’s a Christian framework in the Harry Potter books, and Harry shows the power of love and mercy and self-sacrifice, as Jesus does in the gospels. But there is no trembling before God. There is no demand to have faith in Harry. A woman is given the greatest supernatural role.
As Rowling says, “I wouldn’t expect [religion] to provide all the answers, because I would expect to find some of those within me.” She’s also wary of some of the answers that religion offers. “I have some problems with conventional organized religion,” is how she puts it.
As a result, she’s constructed her own set of beliefs. Seven volumes’ worth.
The Magical Worlds of Harry Potter
titlepage.xhtml
colb_9780425223185_oeb_cover_r1.html
colb_9780425223185_oeb_toc_r1.html
colb_9780425223185_oeb_fm1_r1.html
colb_9780425223185_oeb_fm2_r1.html
colb_9780425223185_oeb_fm3_r1.html
colb_9780425223185_oeb_tp_r1.html
colb_9780425223185_oeb_cop_r1.html
colb_9780425223185_oeb_ded_r1.html
colb_9780425223185_oeb_fm4_r1.html
colb_9780425223185_oeb_fm5_r1.html
colb_9780425223185_oeb_itr_r1.html
colb_9780425223185_oeb_c01_r1.html
colb_9780425223185_oeb_c02_r1.html
colb_9780425223185_oeb_c03_r1.html
colb_9780425223185_oeb_c04_r1.html
colb_9780425223185_oeb_c05_r1.html
colb_9780425223185_oeb_c06_r1.html
colb_9780425223185_oeb_c07_r1.html
colb_9780425223185_oeb_c08_r1.html
colb_9780425223185_oeb_c09_r1.html
colb_9780425223185_oeb_c10_r1.html
colb_9780425223185_oeb_c11_r1.html
colb_9780425223185_oeb_c12_r1.html
colb_9780425223185_oeb_c13_r1.html
colb_9780425223185_oeb_c14_r1.html
colb_9780425223185_oeb_c15_r1.html
colb_9780425223185_oeb_c16_r1.html
colb_9780425223185_oeb_c17_r1.html
colb_9780425223185_oeb_c18_r1.html
colb_9780425223185_oeb_c19_r1.html
colb_9780425223185_oeb_c20_r1.html
colb_9780425223185_oeb_c21_r1.html
colb_9780425223185_oeb_c22_r1.html
colb_9780425223185_oeb_c23_r1.html
colb_9780425223185_oeb_c24_r1.html
colb_9780425223185_oeb_c25_r1.html
colb_9780425223185_oeb_c26_r1.html
colb_9780425223185_oeb_c27_r1.html
colb_9780425223185_oeb_c28_r1.html
colb_9780425223185_oeb_c29_r1.html
colb_9780425223185_oeb_c30_r1.html
colb_9780425223185_oeb_c31_r1.html
colb_9780425223185_oeb_c32_r1.html
colb_9780425223185_oeb_c33_r1.html
colb_9780425223185_oeb_c34_r1.html
colb_9780425223185_oeb_c35_r1.html
colb_9780425223185_oeb_c36_r1.html
colb_9780425223185_oeb_c37_r1.html
colb_9780425223185_oeb_c38_r1.html
colb_9780425223185_oeb_c39_r1.html
colb_9780425223185_oeb_c40_r1.html
colb_9780425223185_oeb_c41_r1.html
colb_9780425223185_oeb_c42_r1.html
colb_9780425223185_oeb_c43_r1.html
colb_9780425223185_oeb_c44_r1.html
colb_9780425223185_oeb_c45_r1.html
colb_9780425223185_oeb_c46_r1.html
colb_9780425223185_oeb_c47_r1.html
colb_9780425223185_oeb_c48_r1.html
colb_9780425223185_oeb_c49_r1.html
colb_9780425223185_oeb_c50_r1.html
colb_9780425223185_oeb_c51_r1.html
colb_9780425223185_oeb_c52_r1.html
colb_9780425223185_oeb_c53_r1.html
colb_9780425223185_oeb_c54_r1.html
colb_9780425223185_oeb_c55_r1.html
colb_9780425223185_oeb_c56_r1.html
colb_9780425223185_oeb_c57_r1.html
colb_9780425223185_oeb_c58_r1.html
colb_9780425223185_oeb_c59_r1.html
colb_9780425223185_oeb_c60_r1_split_000.html
colb_9780425223185_oeb_c60_r1_split_001.html
colb_9780425223185_oeb_c61_r1.html
colb_9780425223185_oeb_c62_r1.html
colb_9780425223185_oeb_c63_r1.html
colb_9780425223185_oeb_c64_r1.html
colb_9780425223185_oeb_c65_r1.html
colb_9780425223185_oeb_c66_r1.html
colb_9780425223185_oeb_aft_r1.html
colb_9780425223185_oeb_ack_r1.html
colb_9780425223185_oeb_bib_r1.html
colb_9780425223185_oeb_nts_r1.html
colb_9780425223185_oeb_in1_r1.html
colb_9780425223185_oeb_ata_r1.html