BIBLIOGRAFÍA
Ackermann, R. J. (1976), The Philosophy of Karl Popper, Amherst, Uníversity of Massachusetrs Press.
—(1989), «The New Experimentalism», British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 40, 185-190.
Anthony, H. D. (1948), Science and its Backgound, Londres, Macmillan.
Armstrong. D. M. (1983), What Is a Law of Nature?, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Ayer, A. J. (1940), The Foundations of Empirical Knowlelge, Londres, Macmillan.
Bamford, G. (1993), «Popper's Explications of Ad Hocness: Circulariry, Empirical Content and Scientific Practice», British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 44, 335355.
Barker, E. (1976), Social Contract: Essays by Locke, Hume and Rousseau, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
Barnes, B. (1982), T.S. Kuhn and Social Science, Londres, Macmillan.
—, D. Bloor y J. Henry (1996), Scientific Knowledge: A Sociological Analysis, Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
Bhaskar, R. (1978), A Realist Theory of Science, Hassocks, Sussex, Harvester.
Block, I. (1961), «Truth and Error in Aristotle's Theory of Sense Perceprion», Philosophical Quarterly, 11,1-9.
Bloor, D. (1971), «Two Paradigms of Scientifics Knowledge», Science Studies, 1,101-115.
Boyd, R. (1984), «The Current Status of Scientific Realism», en J. Leplin (1984), 4182.
Brown, H. J. (1977), Perception, Theory and Commitnent: The New Philosophy of Science, Chicago, Uníversity of Chicago Press.
Buchwald, J. (1989), The Creation of Scientific Effects, Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
Cartwright, N. (1983), How the Laws of Physics Lie, Oxford, Oxford Universiry Press.
—(1989), Nature's Capacities anal Their Measurement, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
Chalmers, A. E (1973), «On Learning from Our Misrakes», British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 24, 164-173.
—(1984), «A Non-Empiricist Account of Experiment», Methodology and Science, 17, 95-114.
—(1985), «Galileo's Telescopie Ohservations of Venus and Mars», British Journal for the Phi1osophy of Science, 36,175-191.
—(1986), «The Galileo that Feyerabend Missed: An Improved Case Against Method», en J. A. Schuster y R. A. Yeo (eds.), The Politics and Rhetoric of Scientific Method. Dordrecht, Reidel, 1-33.
—(1990), Science and Its Fabrication, Milton Keynes, Open University Press.
—(1993), «The Lack of Excellency of Boyle's Mechanical Philosophy», Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 24,541-564.
—(1995), «Ultimate Explanation in Science», Cogito, 9,141-145.
—(1999), «Making Sense of Laws of Physics», en H. Sankey (ed.), Causation and Laws of Nature, Dordrecht, Kluwer.
Christie, M. (1994), «Philosophers versus Chemists Concerning “Laws of Nature”», Studies in History and Philosophy of Scíence, 25, 613-629.
Clavelin, M. (1974), The Natural Philosophy of Galileo, Cambridge, Mass., MIT Press.
Cohen, R. S., P K. Feyerahend y M. W. Wartofsky (eds.) (1976), Essays in Memory of Imre Lakatos, Dordrecht, Reidel.
Davies,J.J. (1968), On the Scientific Method, Londres, Longman.
Dorling, J. (1979), «Bayesian Personalism and Duhem's Problem», Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 10,177-187.
Drake, S. (1957), The Discoveries and Opinions of Galileo, Nueva York, Doubleday.
—(1978), Galileo at Work, Chicago, Chicago University Press.
Duhem, P. (1962), The Aim and Structure of Physical Theory, Nueva York, Atheneum.
—(1969), To Save the Phenomena, Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
Duncan, M. M. (1976), On the Revolutions of the Heavenly Spheres, Nueva York, Barnes and Nohle.
Earman, J. (1992), Bayes or Bust? A Critical Examination of Bayesian Confirmation Theory, Cambridge, Mass., MIT Press.
Edge, D. O. y M. J. Mulkay (1976), Astronomy Transformed, Nueva York, Wiley Interscience.
Feyerabend, P K. (1970), «Consolations for the Specialist», en I. Lakatos y A. Musgrave (1970), 195-230 [«Consuelos para el especialista», en La crítica y el desarrollo del conocimiento, Barcelona, Grijalbo, 1975].
—(1975), Against Method: Outline of an Anarchistic Theory of Knowledge, Londres, New Left Books [Contra el método, trad. de la primera versión aparecida en los Minnesota studies in the philosophy of science, vol. IV, 1970, Barcelona, Ariel, 1974; posteriormente han aparecido al menos dos versiones más. También Tratado del método, Tecnos, 1981].
—(1976), «On the Critique of Scientific Reason», en C. Howson (1976, pp. 209-239). —(1978), Science in a Free Society, Londres, New Left Books [La ciencia en una sociedad libre, Madrid, Siglo XXI, 1982].
—(1981 a), Realism, Rationalism and Scientific Method. Philosophical Papers, Volume I Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
—(198l b), Problems of Empiricism. Philosophical Papers, Volume II, Cambridge, Camhridge University Press.
Franklin, A. (1986), The Neglect of Experiment, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
—(1990), Experimentl, Right or Wrong, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. Galileo (1957), «The Starry Messenger», en S. Drake (1957) [El mensajero de los astros, EUDEBA].
—(1967), Dialogue Concerning tbe Two Chief World Systems, trad. S. Drake, Berkeley, California, University of California Press [Diálogos sobre los sistemas máximos, Aguilar, 1975].
—(1974), Two New Sciences, trad. S. Drake, Madison, University of Wisconsin Press [Trad. cast. de J. Sádaba, rev. y con introducción de C. Solís, Consideraciones y demostraciones matemáticas sobre dos nuevas ciencias, Madrid, Editora Nacional, 1976].
Galison, P. (1987), How Experiments End, Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
—(1997), Image and Logic: A Material Culture of Physics, Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
Gaukroger, S. (1978), Explanatory Structures, Hassocks, Sussex, Harvester.
Geymonat, L. (1965), Galileo Galilei, Nueva York, McGraw Hill.
Glymour, C. (1980), Theory and Evidence, Princeton, Princeton University Press.
Goethe, J. W. (1970), Theory of Colors, trad. C. L. Eastlake, Cambridge, Mass., MIT Press [Obras completas, Madrid, Aguilar, 1973, 3 vols.].
Gooding, D. (1990), Experiment and tbe Making of Meaning: Human Agency in Scientific Observation and Experiment, Dordrecht, Kluwer.
Hacking, I. (1983), Representing and Intervening, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Hanfling, O. (1981), Logical Positivism, Oxford, Basil Blackwell.
Hanson, N. R. (1958), Patterns of Discovery, Cambridge, Camhridge University Press [Patrones de descubrimiento, Madrid, Alianza, 1977].
Hempel, C. G. (1966), Philosophy of Natural Science Englewood Cliffs, NJ, Prentice Hall [La filosofñia de la ciencia natural, Madrid, Alianza, 1973].
Hertz, H. (1962), Electric Waves, Nueva York, Dover.
Hirsch, P. B., R. W. Horne y M. J. Whelan, (1956), «Direct Observation of the Arrangements and Motions of Dislocations in Alumínium», Philosophical Magazine, 1, 677-684.
Hooke, R. (1665), Micrographia, Londres, Martyn and Allestry.
Horwich, P. (1982), Prohability and Evidence, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Howson, C. (ed.) (1976), Method and Appraisal in the Physical Sciences, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
—y P. Urhach (1989), Scientific Reasoning: The Bayesian Approach, La Salle, Illinois, Open Court.
Hoyningen-Huene, P. (1993), Reconstructing Scientific Revolutions: Thomas S. Kuhn's Philosophy of Science, Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
Hume, D. (1939), Treatise on Human Nature, Londres, Dent [Tratado de la naturaleza humana, Madrid, Orbis, 1985].
Klein, U. (1995), «E. E Geoffroy's Table of Different Raports Observed Between Different Chemical Substances», Amhix, 42, 79-100.
—(1996), «The Chemical Workshop Tradition and the Experimental Practice: Discontinuities Within Continuities», Science in Context, 9,251-287.
Kuhn, T. (1959), The Copernican Revolution, Nueva York, Random House [La revolución copernicana, trad. de Domenec Bergadá, Barcelona, Ariel, 1978].
—(1970a), The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, Chicago, University of Chicago Press [La estructura de las revoluciones científicas, México, FCE, 1971].
—(1970b), «Logic of Discovery or Psychology of Research», en I. Lakatos y A. Musgrave (1970), 1-20 [«¿Lógica del descuhrimiento o psicología de la investigación?», en I. Lakatos y A. Musgrave (comps.), La crítica y el desarrollo del conocimiento].
—(1970c), «Reflections on My Critics», en I. Lakatos y A. Musgrave (1970), 231-278 [«Reflexiones sobre mis críticos», en I. Lakatos y A. Musgrave (comps.), La crítica y el desarrollo del conocimiento].
—(1977), The Essential Tension: Selected Studies in Scientific Tradition and Change, Chicago, University of Chicago Press [La tensión esencial, Madrid, FCE, 1983].
Lakatos, I. (1968), The Prohlem of Inductive Logic, Amsterdam, North Holland.
—(1970), «Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes», en I. Lakatos y A. Musgrave (1970), 91-196 [«Falsación y la metodología de los programas de investigación científica», en I. Lakatos y A. Musgrave (comps.), La critica y el desarrollo del conocimiento].
—(1971), «Replies to Critics», en R. Buck y R. S. Cohen (eds.), Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Volume 8. Dordrecht, Reidel.
—(1976a), «Newton's Effect on Scientific Standards», en J. Worral y G. Currie (1978a), 193-222.
—(1976b), Proofs and Refutations, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press [Pruebas y refutaciones, trad. de C. Solís, 3ª ed., Madrid, Alianza, 1986].
—(1978), «History of Science and Its Rational Reconstruction», en J. Worral y G. Currie (1978a), 102-138 [Historia de la ciencia y sus reconstrucciones racionales, trad. de Diego Ribes, Madrid, Tecnos, 1974].
— y A. Musgrave (eds.) (1970), Criticism and the Grouwth of Knowledge, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press [La crítica y el desarrollo del conocimiento científico, Barcelona, Grijalbo, 1975].
—y E. Zahar (1975), «Why Did Copernicus' Programme Supersede Ptolemy's», en R. Westman (ed.), The Copernican Achievement, Berkeley, California, University of California Press.
Larvor, B. (1998), Lakatos: An Introduction, Londres, Routledge.
Laudan, L. (1977), Progress and Its Problems: Towards a Theory of Scientifíc Growth, Berkeley, University of California Press.
—(1984), Science and Values: The Aims of Science and Their Role in Scientific Debate, Berkeley, University of California Press.
Leplin, J. (1984), Scientific Realism, Berkeley, University of California Press.
Locke, J. (1967), An Essay Concerning Human Understanding, Londres, Dent.
Maxwell, J. C. (1877), «The Kinetic Theory of Gases», Nature, 16, 245-246.
—(1965), «Illustrations of the Dynamical Theory of Gases», en W. D. Niven (ed.), The Scientfic Papers of James Clerk Maxwell, 2 vols., Nueva York, Dover.
Mayo, D. (1996), Error and the Growth of Experimental Knowledge, Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
Menter, J. (1956), «The Direct Study by Electron Microscopy Crystal Lattices and Their Imperfections», Proceedings of the Royal Society: A, 236,119-135.
Mill, J. S. (1975), On Liberty, Nueva York, Norton.
Mulkay, M. (1979), Science and the Sociology of Knowledge, Londres, Allen and Unwin.
Musgrave, A. (1974a), «The Objectivism of Popper's Epistemology», en P. A. Schilpp (1974, 560-596).
—(1974b), «Logical Versus Historical Theories of Confirmation», British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 25,1-23.
Nersessian, N. (1984), Farady to Einstein: Constructing Meaning in Scíentfic Theories, Dordrecht, Kluwer.
Newman, W R. (1994), Gebennical Fire: The Lives of George Starkey en American Alchemist in the Scientific Revolution, Cambridge, Mass., Harvard University Press.
—y L. M. Principe (1998), «Alchemy vs Chemistry: the Etymological Ongins of a Historiographic Mistake», Early Science and Medicine: 3, 32-65.
Nye, M. J. (1980), «N-rays: An Episode in the History and Psychology of Science», Historical Studies in the Physical Sciences 11, 125-156.
O'Hear, A. (1980), Karl Popper, Londres, Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Poincaré, H. (1952), Science andHypotheses, Nueva York, Dover [La ciencia y la hipótesis, Madrid, Espasa-Calpe, 1974].
Polanyi, M. (1973) Personal Knowledge, Londres, Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Popper, K. R. (1969), Conjectures and Refutations, Londres, Routledge and Kegan Paul [El desarrollo del conocimiento cientifico: conjeturas y refutaciones, Buenos Aires, Paidós, 1967].
—(1972), The Logic of Scientific Discovery, Londres, Hutchinson [La lógica de la investigación cientifica, trad. de Víctor Sánchez de Zavala, Madrid, Tecnos, 1967].
—(1974), «Normal Science and Its Dangers», en I. Lakatos y A. Musgrave (1974,5158).
—(1979), Objective Knowledge, Oxford, Oxford University Press [Conocimiento objetivo, Madrid, Tecnos, 1974].
—(1983), Realism and the Aim of Science, Londres, Hutchinson.
Price, D. J. de S. (1969), «A Critical Re-estimation of the Mathematical Planetary Theory of Ptolemy», en M. Clagett (ed.), Critical Problems in the Historry of Science, Madison, University of Wisconsin Press.
Quine, W. V. O. (1961), «Two Dogmas of Empiricism», en From a Logical Point of View, Nueva York, Harper and Row [«Dos dogmas del empirismo», en Desde un punto de vista lógico, trad. de Manuel Sacristán, Barcelona, Ariel, 1962].
Ravetz, J. R. (1971), Scientific Knowledge and Its Social Problems, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
Rosen, E. (1962), Three Copernican Treatises, Nueva York, Dover.
Rosenkrantz, R. D. (1977), Inference, Method and Decision: Towards a Bayesian Philosophy of Science, Dordrecht, Reidel.
Rowbotham, F. J. (1918), Story Lives of Great Scientists, Wells, Gardner and Darton.
Russell, B. (1912), Problems of Philosophy, Oxford, Oxford University Press [Los problemas de la filosofía, trad. de Joaquín Xirau y prólogo de Emilio Lledó, Barcelona, Labor, 1975].
Salmon, W. (1966), The Foundations of Scientific Inference, Pittsburgh, University of Pittsburgh Press.
Schilpp, P. A. (ed.) (1974), The Philosophy of Karl Popper, La Salle, Illinois, Open Court.
Shapere, D. (1982), «The Concept of Observation in Science and Philosophy», Philosophy of Science, 49, 485-525.
Stove, D. (1973), Probabity and Hume's Inductive Skepticism, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
Thomason, N. (1994), «The Power of ARCHED Hypotheses: Feyerabend's Galileo as a Closet Rationalist», British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 45, 255-264.
—(1998), «1543 - The Year That Copernicus Didn't Predict the Phases of Venus», en A.
Corones y G. Freeland (eds.), 1543 and All That, Dordrecht, Reidel.
Thurher, J. (1933), My Life end Hard Times, Nueva York, Harper.
Van Fraassen, Bas C. (1980), The Scientific lmage, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
—(1989), Laws and Symmetry, Oxford, Oxford University Press. Woolgar, S. (1988), Science: The Very Idea, Londres, Tavistock.
Worrall, J. (1976), «Thomas Young and the “Refutation” of Newtonian Optics: A Case Study in the Interaction of Philosophy of Science and History», en Howson (1976, 107179).
—(1982), «Scientific Realism and Scientific Change», en Philosophical Quarterly, 32, 201-231.
—(1985), «Scientific Reasoning and Theory Confirmation», en J. Pitt (ed.), Change and Progress in Modern Science, Dordrecht, Reidel.
—(1988), «The Value of a Fixed Methodology», British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 39, 263-275.
—(1989 a), «Fresnel, Poisson and the White Spor: The Role of Successful Predictions in Theory Acceptance», en D. Gooding, S. Schaffer y T. Pinch (eds.), The Uses of Experiments: Studies of Experiment in Natural Science, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
—(1989b), «Structural realism: The Best of Both Worlds?», Dialectica, 43, 99-124
— y G. Currie (eds.) (1978 a), Imre Lakatos, Philosophical Pepers, Volume 1: The Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
— y (eds.) (1978b), Imre Lakatos, Philosophical Papers, Volume 2: Mathematics, Science and Epistemology, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Zahar, E. (1973), «Why Did Einstein's Theory Supersede Lorentz's», British Journal for the Philosophy of Science: 24,95-123 y 223-263.